Literature DB >> 24428545

A critical examination of indices of dynamic interaction for wildlife telemetry studies.

Jed A Long1, Trisalyn A Nelson2, Stephen L Webb3, Kenneth L Gee3.   

Abstract

Wildlife scientists continue to be interested in studying ways to quantify how the movements of animals are interdependent - dynamic interaction. While a number of applied studies of dynamic interaction exist, little is known about the comparative effectiveness and applicability of available methods used for quantifying interactions between animals. We highlight the formulation, implementation and interpretation of a suite of eight currently available indices of dynamic interaction. Point- and path-based approaches are contrasted to demonstrate differences between methods and underlying assumptions on telemetry data. Correlated and biased correlated random walks were simulated at a range of sampling resolutions to generate scenarios with dynamic interaction present and absent. We evaluate the effectiveness of each index at identifying different types of interactive behaviour at each sampling resolution. Each index is then applied to an empirical telemetry data set of three white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dyads. Results from the simulated data show that three indices of dynamic interaction reliant on statistical testing procedures are susceptible to Type I error, which increases at fine sampling resolutions. In the white-tailed deer examples, a recently developed index for quantifying local-level cohesive movement behaviour (the di index) provides revealing information on the presence of infrequent and varying interactions in space and time. Point-based approaches implemented with finely sampled telemetry data overestimate the presence of interactions (Type I errors). Indices producing only a single global statistic (7 of the 8 indices) are unable to quantify infrequent and varying interactions through time. The quantification of infrequent and variable interactive behaviour has important implications for the spread of disease and the prevalence of social behaviour in wildlife. Guidelines are presented to inform researchers wishing to study dynamic interaction patterns in their own telemetry data sets. Finally, we make our code openly available, in the statistical software R, for computing each index of dynamic interaction presented herein.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPS telemetry; Odocoileus virginianus; biased random walk; contact rate; proximity; sampling resolution; simulation; static interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24428545     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  12 in total

1.  Disentangling social interactions and environmental drivers in multi-individual wildlife tracking data.

Authors:  Justin M Calabrese; Christen H Fleming; William F Fagan; Martin Rimmler; Petra Kaczensky; Sharon Bewick; Peter Leimgruber; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Dynamic interactions between apex predators reveal contrasting seasonal attraction patterns.

Authors:  S Périquet; H Fritz; E Revilla; D W Macdonald; A J Loveridge; G Mtare; M Valeix
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Trade-offs with telemetry-derived contact networks for infectious disease studies in wildlife.

Authors:  Marie L J Gilbertson; Lauren A White; Meggan E Craft
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 7.781

4.  Does landscape connectivity shape local and global social network structure in white-tailed deer?

Authors:  Erin L Koen; Marie I Tosa; Clayton K Nielsen; Eric M Schauber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantifying gaze and mouse interactions on spatial visual interfaces with a new movement analytics methodology.

Authors:  Urška Demšar; Arzu Çöltekin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using GPS collars to investigate the frequency and behavioural outcomes of intraspecific interactions among carnivores: A case study of male cheetahs in the Maasai Mara, Kenya.

Authors:  Femke Broekhuis; Emily K Madsen; Kosiom Keiwua; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system.

Authors:  Jeremy J Cusack; Michel T Kohl; Matthew C Metz; Tim Coulson; Daniel R Stahler; Douglas W Smith; Daniel R MacNulty
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Mapping areas of spatial-temporal overlap from wildlife tracking data.

Authors:  Jed A Long; Stephen L Webb; Trisalyn A Nelson; Kenneth L Gee
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 3.600

9.  Dynamics of animal joint space use: a novel application of a time series approach.

Authors:  Justin T French; Hsiao-Hsuan Wang; William E Grant; John M Tomeček
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.600

10.  Caution is warranted when using animal space-use and movement to infer behavioral states.

Authors:  Frances E Buderman; Tess M Gingery; Duane R Diefenbach; Laura C Gigliotti; Danielle Begley-Miller; Marc M McDill; Bret D Wallingford; Christopher S Rosenberry; Patrick J Drohan
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.