Literature DB >> 24428515

Therapeutic relationships between mental health service users with psychotic disorders and their clinicians: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Simone Farrelly1, Helen Lester.   

Abstract

Individuals with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders remain among the most marginalised in our communities. There has been increasing criticism of the current state of clinical treatment of such individuals as technological developments in medication provide little, if any, improvement in the lived experiences of mental health service users (SUs). In this context, there is a call for a re-orientation away from medication in the treatment of 'common factors' such as the therapeutic relationship (TR). The TR is well researched in psychotherapy settings; however, the components of beneficial TRs in the treatment of individuals with psychotic disorders are poorly understood. A critical interpretive synthesis was conducted to determine the current understanding of the TRs between individuals with psychotic disorders and their clinicians in community case management settings. A search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Social Policy and Practice Databases and grey literature between 1990 and 2011 identified 13 papers to be included in the synthesis. Three key components of beneficial TRs were identified: mutual trust, demonstration of mutual respect and shared decision-making. However, the synthesis revealed that such interactions are difficult to achieve in routine practice. The main barrier identified was a lack of clarity regarding the goal of interactions, which in turn created stakeholders with poorly defined roles and possibly oppositional needs. In this context of ambiguity, clinicians appear to de-emphasise interactions characteristic of beneficial TRs, and prioritise interactions that protect the SU and themselves in the case of a relapse. Structural symbolic interactionism is used to interpret these findings. For interactions characteristic of TRs to be prioritised in the treatment of individuals with psychotic disorders, a clearer evidence base for the importance of the TR and a clear statement of purpose of treatment are required.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mental health; patient centredness; psychosis; synthesis; therapeutic relationships; trust

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24428515     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  12 in total

1.  Barriers to shared decision making in mental health care: qualitative study of the Joint Crisis Plan for psychosis.

Authors:  Simone Farrelly; Helen Lester; Diana Rose; Max Birchwood; Max Marshall; Waquas Waheed; R Claire Henderson; George Szmukler; Graham Thornicroft
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Recovery After Psychosis: Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Lived Experience Videos on a Recovery-Oriented Website.

Authors:  Anne Williams; Ellie Fossey; John Farhall; Fiona Foley; Neil Thomas
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2018-05-08

3.  Psychotherapy in Psychosis: Experiences of Fully Recovered Service Users.

Authors:  Jone Bjornestad; Marius Veseth; Larry Davidson; Inge Joa; Jan Olav Johannessen; Tor Ketil Larsen; Ingrid Melle; Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-04

4.  Internet-based interventions to support recovery and self-management: A scoping review of their use by mental health service users and providers together.

Authors:  Anne Williams; John Farhall; Ellie Fossey; Neil Thomas
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Key features of an innovative sub-acute residential service for young people experiencing mental ill health.

Authors:  Rachael Green; Penelope Fay Mitchell; Kira Lee; Ella Svensson; Jia-Wern Toh; Carolyn Barentsen; Michala Copeland; J Richard Newton; Kari Christine Hawke; Lisa Brophy
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Threats to epistemic agency in young people with unusual experiences and beliefs.

Authors:  Joseph W Houlders; Lisa Bortolotti; Matthew R Broome
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Diversity, Complexity and Ordinality: Mental Health Services Outside the Institutions-Service Users' and Professionals' Experience-Based Practices and Knowledges, and New Public Management.

Authors:  Alain Topor; David Matscheck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness.

Authors:  Mediha Younas; Eleanor Bradley; Nikki Holmes; Dolly Sud; Ian D Maidment
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-07-23

9.  Psychometric Properties of Scale to Assess the Therapeutic Relationship-JapaneseVersion (STAR-J).

Authors:  Asami Matsunaga; Sosei Yamaguchi; Utako Sawada; Takuma Shiozawa; Chiyo Fujii
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  "Sex isn't everything": views of people with experience of psychosis on intimate relationships and implications for mental health services.

Authors:  Rebecca White; Gillian Haddock; Filippo Varese; Maria Haarmans
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.