Literature DB >> 24427708

The Correlation Between Pre and Postoperative Hearing Level with High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) Findings in Congenital Canal Atresia (CAA) Patients.

A Asma1, A W Abdul Fatah2, A H Hamzaini3, A Mazita1.   

Abstract

In managing patient with congenital congenital aural atresia (CAA), preoperative high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan and hearing assessment are important. A grading system based on HRCT findings was first introduced by Jahrsdoefer in order to select appropriate candidates for operation and to predict the postoperative hearing outcome in CAA patients. The score of eight and more was considered as a good prognostic factor for hearing reconstruction surgery. However previously in our center this score was not used as the criteria for surgical procedure. This study was conducted at Center A to evaluate the correlation between pre and postoperative hearing level with HRCT based on a Jahrsdoefer grading system in patients with CAA. All records and HRCT films with CAA from January 1997 until December 2007 at Center A were evaluated. The demographic data, operative records, pre and post operative hearing levels and HRCT findings were analyzed. Hearing level in this study was based on a pure tone average of air-bone gap at 500 Hz, 1 kHz and 2 kHz or hearing level obtained from auditory brainstem response eudiometry. This study was approved by Research Ethics Committee (code number, FF-197-2008). Thirty-two ears were retrospectively evaluated. The postoperative hearing level of 30 dB and less was considered as successful hearing result postoperatively. Of the six ears which underwent canalplasty, three had achieved successful hearing result. However, there was no significant correlation between preoperative hearing level (HL) with HRCT score and postoperative HL with HRCT score at 0.05 significant levels (correlation coefficient = -0.292, P = 0.105 and correlation coefficient = -0.127, P = 0.810) respectively. Hearing evaluation and HRCT temporal bone are two independent evaluations for the patients with CAA before going for hearing reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canal atresia; Canalplasty; High resolution computed tomography; Pure tone audiometry; Stapes

Year:  2012        PMID: 24427708      PMCID: PMC3889344          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-011-0438-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  12 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of external auditory canal atresia on high-resolution CT.

Authors:  Eva Maria Gassner; Ammar Mallouhi; Werner R Jaschke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  R A Jahrsdoerfer; J W Yeakley; E A Aguilar; R R Cole; L C Gray
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1992-01

3.  Treacher Collins syndrome: otologic and auditory management.

Authors:  R A Jahrsdoerfer; J T Jacobson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Correlation between microtia and temporal bone malformation evaluated using grading systems.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Ishimoto; Ken Ito; Tatsuya Yamasoba; Kenji Kondo; Shotaro Karino; Hideki Takegoshi; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-04

5.  Congenital aural atresia: transmastoid approach; an old technique with good results.

Authors:  Zoheir El-Hoshy; Mosaad Abdel-Aziz; Mohamed Shabana
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Microtia grade as an indicator of middle ear development in aural atresia.

Authors:  S E Kountakis; E Helidonis; R A Jahrsdoerfer
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-08

7.  High-resolution CT scanning and auditory brain stem response in congenital aural atresia: patient selection and surgical correlation.

Authors:  R A Jahrsdoerfer; J W Yeakley; J W Hall; K T Robbins; L C Gray
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Advances in congenital aural atresia surgery: effects on outcome.

Authors:  Karen Borne Teufert; Antonio De la Cruz
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  CT evaluation of congenital aural atresia: what the radiologist and surgeon need to know.

Authors:  J W Yeakley; R A Jahrsdoerfer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results.

Authors:  Antonio De la Cruz; Karen Borne Teufert
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.591

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.