| Literature DB >> 24427493 |
Emrah Can1, Ali Bülbül1, Sinan Uslu1, Fatih Bolat1, Serdar Cömert1, Asiye Nuhoğlu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early aggressive vs. conservative nutrition and its effect on Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in <32 weeks of gestation neonates.Entities:
Keywords: IGF-1; IGFBP3; Parenteral nutrition; Prematurity; Retinopathy of prematurity
Year: 2013 PMID: 24427493 PMCID: PMC3883369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pediatr ISSN: 2008-2142 Impact factor: 0.364
Fig. 1Flow diagram of eligible newborns.
The number of neonates not randomized and the reasons for non-enrolment are provided.
APN: Aggressive Parenteral Nutrition; CPN: Conventional Parenteral Nutrition
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the groups
| Parameter | APN (n = 40) | CPN (n = 35) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 28.7 (1.5) [25-31] | 29.0 ± 1.1 [25-31] | 0.3 |
|
| 1210 (176.2) | 1278 (145.5) | 0.07 |
|
| 41.1 (3.4) | 40.7 (3.2) | 0.6 |
|
| 29.4 (2.2) | 29.1 (2.0) | 0.5 |
|
| 24.4(3.6) | 23.1(4.2) | 0.2 |
|
| 25.0 (68) | 23.0 (76) | 0.07 |
|
| 27.0(68) | 25.0 (76) | 0.9 |
|
| 0 | 2.0(5.7) | 0.2 |
APN: Aggressive parenteral nutrition; CPN: Conventional parenteral nutrition, mean (SD)
Nutritional characteristics of the groups
| Parameter | APN (n = 40) | CPN (n = 35) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13.1 (3.5) | 13.5 (3.0) | 0.6 |
|
| 15.1 (5.8) | 14.8 (5.5) | 0.8 |
|
| 121,5(35.5) | 115,5(28.5) | 0.4 |
|
| 3.52 (0.7) | 3.2 (0.5) | 0.02 |
|
| 6.6 (1.5) | 6.1 (0.6) | 0.03 |
|
| 115(75) | 100(80) | 0.4 |
* Student's t-test, mean (SD); APN: Aggressive parenteral nutrition; CPN: Conventional parenteral nutrition
Comparison of Insulin-like growth factor-1 (ng/mL) levels in the study groups
| Time | APN and ROP (n = 2) | APN and no ROP (n = 38) |
| CPN and ROP (n = 11) | CPN and no ROP (n = 24) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18.2 (1.1) | 19.1 (1.4) | 0.4 | 17.6 (1.6) | 18.0 (1.8) | 0.5 |
|
| 20.3 (1.2) | 21.5 (1.1) | 0.1 | 14.5 (2.1) | 15.6 (1.5) | 0.08 |
|
| 24.1 (1.7) | 25.4 (1.3) | 0.2 | 20.2 (1.5) | 21.1 (1.8) | 0.2 |
|
| 29.1 (1.9) | 31.8 (1.5) | 0.01 | 24.1 (1.6) | 25.2 (1.8) | 0.08 |
|
| 34.7 (3.2) | 37.5 (1.8) | 0.04 | 26.3 (1.8) | 27.2 (1.6) | 0.1 |
|
| 37.9 (3.7) | 39.8 (1.1) | 0.04 | 31.2 (2.9) | 32.8 (2.1) | 0.07 |
APN: Aggressive parenteral nutrition; CPN: Conventional parenteral nutrition
ANOVA t-test
3rd week correlation coefficient was revelaled [IGF-1 (r2:-0.65), IGFBP3 (r2:-0.51)]
Comparison of insulin growth factor binding protein-3 levels in the study groups
| Time | APN and ROP (n = 2) | APN and no ROP (n = 38) |
| CPN and ROP (n = 11) | CPN and no ROP (n = 24) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 535 (74) | 552 (65) | 0.7 | 488 (98) | 496 (75) | 0.8 |
|
| 825 (55) | 867 (42) | 0.2 | 674 (65) | 702 (52) | 0.2 |
|
| 1065 (45) | 1102 (48) | 0.3 | 896 (75) | 927 (61) | 0.2 |
|
| 1220 (54) | 1268 (31) | 0.04 | 980 (95) | 1024 (52) | 0.08 |
|
| 1578 (79) | 1632 (28) | 0.01 | 1134 (132) | 1198 (94) | 0.1 |
|
| 1674 (97) | 1736 (35) | 0.03 | 1328 (90) | 1377 (81) | 0.1 |
APN: Aggressive parenteral nutrition; CPN: Conventional parenteral nutrition
ANOVA t-test
3rd week correlation coefficient was revelaled [IGF-1 (r2:-0.65), IGFBP3 (r2:-0.51)]
Fig. 2Left: Cut-off point level 30 ng/ml for IGF-1 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 87.5%)
Right: Cut-off point level 1300 ng/ml for IGFBP3 (sensitivity 90%, specificity 90%)
IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor 1