| Literature DB >> 24427477 |
Anand Prabhu1, Arun Prasad Rao1, Mohan Govindarajan1, Venugopal Reddy1, Ramalingam Krishnakumar1, Sugumaran Kaliyamoorthy1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dental trauma has become an important aspect of dental public health. The primary requisite before actively dealing with such problems is to describe the extent, distribution, and variables associated with the specific condition. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and role of socioeconomic status and anatomic risk factors in traumatic dental injuries (TDI) to permanent anterior teeth in 10 to 16 year old Sainik (Army) school, children in India.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior Teeth Trauma; Lip Competence; Overjet; Socioeconomic Status; Traumatic Dental Injuries
Year: 2013 PMID: 24427477 PMCID: PMC3880662 DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.34257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Sports Med ISSN: 2008-000X
Trauma classification by Sgan Cohen et al[
| Trauma score | Description |
|---|---|
|
| No evidence of trauma |
|
| Trauma limited to enamel |
|
| Trauma involving dentin |
|
| Trauma involving the pulp |
|
| Treated trauma, which had clearly involved at least the dentin and usually restored with a composite restoration |
|
| Discoloration due to trauma (verified by interview) |
|
| Avulsed tooth due to trauma (verified by interview) |
Toothwise distribution of trauma and trauma scores in children with active sports involvement
| Trauma score | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total (N%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 41 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 66 (39.8) |
|
| 16 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 (19.9) |
|
| 20 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 (25.3) |
|
| 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 (6.6) |
|
| 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 (8.4) |
|
| 91(51.8) | 67(40.4) | 4(2.4) | 2(1.2) | 1(0.6) | 1(0.6) | 166 (100) |
Chi square value = 24.30; P. value= 0.2
Cause of injury in participants
| Cause | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
|
| 23 (22) |
|
| 62 (58) |
|
| 2 (2) |
|
| 13 (12) |
|
| 4 (4) |
|
| 2 (2) |
|
| 106 (100) |
Chi square value = 152.45; P. value <0.0001
Trauma distribution by Socioeconomic status
| Risk factor | Trauma | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||
|
| 59 | 191 | 250 (56.1) |
|
| 37 | 108 | 145 (32.5) |
|
| 7 | 35 | 42 (9.4) |
|
| 3 | 6 | 9 (2) |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 106 (23.8%) | 340 (76.2%) | 446 (100%) |
Gamma value = 0.009; P. value = 0.9
Trauma distribution by Lip coverage and Overjet
| Anatomic risk factor | Trauma | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
|
| Adequate | 36 | 303 | 339 (76%) |
| Inadequate | 70 | 37 | 107(24%) | |
| Total | 106 (23.8%) | 340 (76.2%) | 446 (100%) | |
|
| <3.5 mm | 18 | 222 | 240 (53.8%) |
| 3.5 to 5.5 mm | 54 | 98 | 152 (34.1%) | |
| >5.5 mm | 34 | 20 | 54 (12.1%) | |
| Total | 106 (23.8%) | 340 (76.2%) | 446 (100%) | |
Chi-square value = 134.80; P. value <0.001; Gamma value = −0.78