Literature DB >> 24426977

Lithium vanado(V)molybdate(VI), Li[VMoO6].

Safa Ezzine Yahmed1, Rawia Nasri1, Mohamed Faouzi Zid1, Ahmed Driss1.   

Abstract

Brannerite-type Li[VMoO6] has been synthesized by a solid state reaction route. The V and Mo atoms statistically occupy the same site with mirror symmetry and are octa-hedrally surrounded by O atoms. The framework is two-dimensional and is built up from edge-sharing (V,Mo)O6 octa-hedra forming (VMoO6)∞ layers that run parallel to the (001) plane. Li(+) ions are situated in position with symmetry 2/m in the inter-layer space. The bond-valence analysis reveals that the Li(+) ionic conductivity is along the [010] and [110] directions, and shows that this material may have inter-esting conduction properties. This simulation proposes a model of the lithium conduction pathways.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24426977      PMCID: PMC3884465          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to lithium-ion batteries, see: Delmas et al. (1999 ▶); Cabana et al. (2003 ▶); Yin et al. (2003 ▶); Morgan et al. (2002 ▶); Gaubicher et al. (2000 ▶); Sato et al. (2000 ▶); Fu et al. (2010 ▶); Mikhailova et al. (2010 ▶). For details of structural relationships with other compounds, see: Andersson & Magnéli (1950 ▶); Darriet & Galy (1968 ▶); Karen et al. (2006 ▶); Knyazev et al. (2009 ▶); Mocala & Ziolkowski (1987 ▶); Mucha et al. (1999 ▶); Ruh & Wadsley (1966 ▶); Shklover et al. (1996 ▶). For details of the bond-valence method, see: Brown, (2002 ▶). For BVS pathway simulation, see: Mazza et al. (2002 ▶); Ben Smida et al. (2013 ▶); Mazza (2001 ▶); Ouerfelli et al. (2007a ▶,b ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

LiMoVO6 M = 249.82 Monoclinic, a = 9.3555 (9) Å b = 3.6432 (5) Å c = 6.6887 (7) Å β = 111.669 (6)° V = 211.87 (4) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.10 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.29 × 0.22 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD4 diffractometer Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.274, T max = 0.498 876 measured reflections 354 independent reflections 350 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.018 2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 1.1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.018 wR(F 2) = 0.052 S = 1.16 354 reflections 30 parameters Δρmax = 0.90 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.57 e Å−3 Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Duisenberg, 1992 ▶; Macíček & Yordanov, 1992 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022411/ru2052sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022411/ru2052Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
LiMoVO6F(000) = 232
Mr = 249.82Dx = 3.916 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 9.3555 (9) Åθ = 11–16°
b = 3.6432 (5) ŵ = 5.10 mm1
c = 6.6887 (7) ÅT = 298 K
β = 111.669 (6)°Prism, yellow
V = 211.87 (4) Å30.29 × 0.22 × 0.14 mm
Z = 2
Enraf Nonius CAD4 diffractometer350 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.018
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.3°
ω/2θ scansh = −12→12
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968)k = −5→1
Tmin = 0.274, Tmax = 0.498l = −9→9
876 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
354 independent reflections intensity decay: 1.1%
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0273P)2 + 0.9791P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.052(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.16Δρmax = 0.90 e Å3
354 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.57 e Å3
30 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.008 (2)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Mo0.18622 (4)0.00000.65068 (5)0.00752 (17)0.50
V0.18622 (4)0.00000.65068 (5)0.00752 (17)0.50
Li0.00000.00000.00000.0152 (17)
O10.0259 (3)0.00000.7107 (5)0.0167 (5)
O20.3080 (3)0.00000.4362 (4)0.0096 (4)
O30.3319 (3)0.00000.8860 (4)0.0173 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mo0.0082 (2)0.0049 (2)0.0100 (2)0.0000.00406 (14)0.000
V0.0082 (2)0.0049 (2)0.0100 (2)0.0000.00406 (14)0.000
Li0.015 (4)0.026 (5)0.006 (3)0.0000.005 (3)0.000
O10.0108 (10)0.0092 (12)0.0320 (14)0.0000.0102 (10)0.000
O20.0118 (10)0.0039 (10)0.0159 (10)0.0000.0083 (8)0.000
O30.0131 (11)0.0221 (15)0.0151 (11)0.0000.0032 (9)0.000
Mo—O31.659 (3)Li—O3vi2.3423 (16)
Mo—O11.690 (3)Li—O3i2.3423 (16)
Mo—O2i1.9189 (8)O1—Livii2.037 (3)
Mo—O2ii1.9189 (8)O1—Moiii2.497 (3)
Mo—O22.136 (2)O2—Vi1.9189 (8)
Mo—O1iii2.497 (3)O2—Moi1.9189 (8)
Li—O1iv2.037 (3)O2—Vii1.9189 (8)
Li—O1iii2.037 (3)O2—Moii1.9189 (8)
Li—O3ii2.3423 (16)O3—Liviii2.3423 (16)
Li—O3v2.3423 (16)O3—Liix2.3423 (16)
O3—Mo—O1105.39 (14)O3ii—Li—O3vi77.90 (10)
O3—Mo—O2i100.50 (8)O3v—Li—O3vi102.10 (10)
O1—Mo—O2i101.46 (7)O1iv—Li—O3i90.48 (8)
O3—Mo—O2ii100.50 (8)O1iii—Li—O3i89.52 (8)
O1—Mo—O2ii101.46 (7)O3ii—Li—O3i102.10 (10)
O2i—Mo—O2ii143.35 (14)O3v—Li—O3i77.90 (10)
O3—Mo—O2100.49 (11)O3vi—Li—O3i180.00 (14)
O1—Mo—O2154.13 (13)Mo—O1—Livii130.75 (16)
O2i—Mo—O273.43 (7)Mo—O1—Moiii103.17 (14)
O2ii—Mo—O273.43 (7)Livii—O1—Moiii126.08 (11)
O3—Mo—O1iii177.79 (11)Vi—O2—Moi0.00 (2)
O1—Mo—O1iii76.83 (14)Vi—O2—Vii143.35 (14)
O2i—Mo—O1iii78.93 (8)Moi—O2—Vii143.35 (14)
O2ii—Mo—O1iii78.93 (8)Vi—O2—Moii143.35 (14)
O2—Mo—O1iii77.30 (9)Moi—O2—Moii143.35 (14)
O1iv—Li—O1iii180.00 (14)Vii—O2—Moii0.00 (2)
O1iv—Li—O3ii90.48 (8)Vi—O2—Mo106.57 (7)
O1iii—Li—O3ii89.52 (8)Moi—O2—Mo106.57 (7)
O1iv—Li—O3v89.52 (8)Vii—O2—Mo106.57 (7)
O1iii—Li—O3v90.48 (8)Moii—O2—Mo106.57 (7)
O3ii—Li—O3v180.00 (14)Mo—O3—Liviii121.78 (8)
O1iv—Li—O3vi89.52 (8)Mo—O3—Liix121.78 (8)
O1iii—Li—O3vi90.48 (8)Liviii—O3—Liix102.10 (10)
  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Electrochemical property: Structure relationships in monoclinic Li(3-y)V2(PO4)3.

Authors:  S-C Yin; H Grondey; P Strobel; M Anne; L F Nazar
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  LiCo2As3O10: une nouvelle structure à tunnels inter-connectés.

Authors:  Youssef Ben Smida; Abderrahmen Guesmi; Ahmed Driss
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-05-31
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Na1.67Mn2.17(MoO4)3.

Authors:  Chahira Bouzidi; Mohamed Faouzi Zid; Ahmed Driss; Wafa Frigui
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-03-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.