Literature DB >> 24426796

The importance of child and youth death review.

Amy Ornstein, Matthew Bowes, Michelle Shouldice, Natalie L Yanchar.   

Abstract

The mandate of a formal child death review (CDR) system is to advance understanding of how and why children die, to improve child health and safety, and to prevent deaths and injuries in the future. Areas in which CDR has provided valuable information and/or intervention include sudden death in infancy, unintentional injuries (the leading cause of death in Canadian children and youth one to 19 years of age), suicide in youth, and deaths due to homicide or child maltreatment. When collected systematically using common definitions, information regarding deaths in children and youth can help with understanding the scope of problems. Information about the context of a death can inform potential prevention or intervention activities. CDR can improve medical and mental health best practices, child welfare policies and procedures, and legislation and education relevant to public health and safety. In the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, CDR processes are mandated by legislation. In Canada, death review teams have diverse structures and functions, and the CDR system is less well developed. The present statement addresses the need for formal, organized child and youth death review in Canada to help strengthen and systemize injury and death prevention efforts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; Child death review; Injury prevention; Youth

Year:  2013        PMID: 24426796      PMCID: PMC3887082     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  6 in total

1.  The US National Child Death review case reporting system.

Authors:  Theresa M Covington
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Responding to and learning from childhood deaths.

Authors:  Peter Sidebotham; Gale Pearson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-23

3.  Child and youth injury prevention: A public health approach.

Authors:  Natalie L Yanchar; Lynne J Warda; Pamela Fuselli
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  U.S. child death review programs: assessing progress toward a standard review process.

Authors:  Jenelle R Shanley; Elizabeth C Risch; Barbara L Bonner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement--child fatality review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The Missouri child fatality study: underreporting of maltreatment fatalities among children younger than five years of age, 1983 through 1986.

Authors:  B Ewigman; C Kivlahan; G Land
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.124

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Implementation of Child Death Review in the Netherlands: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Sandra Gijzen; Michaëla I Hilhorst; Monique P L'Hoir; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Ariana Need
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Procedures in child deaths in The Netherlands: a comparison with child death review.

Authors:  Sandra Gijzen; Jessica Petter; Monique P L'Hoir; Magda M Boere-Boonekamp; Ariana Need
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2017-05-26

3.  All-terrain vehicle serious injuries and death in children and youth: A national survey of Canadian paediatricians.

Authors:  Peter J Gill; Thomas McLaughlin; Daniel Rosenfield; Charlotte Moore Hepburn; Natalie L Yanchar; Suzanne Beno
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.253

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.