Literature DB >> 24425857

Measurement of difference thresholds on the ocular surface.

Subam Basuthkar Sundar Rao1, Trefford L Simpson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish difference thresholds of the central cornea and compare thresholds between contact lens wearers and noncontact lens wearers.
METHODS: Mechanical sensitivity of the central cornea was determined in 12 lens wearers and 12 nonlens wearers using a modified Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer and method of limits. Then, a series of systematically increasing stimuli were presented, with the first stimulus being 25% less than threshold. Subjects compared intensity of each stimulus with the preceding one and reported if any difference in intensity was detectable. Intensities at which an increase was perceived from the prior stimulus were recorded and the difference between the intensities was the difference threshold (DL). Five DLs were measured for each subject. Weber's constants that relate the size of difference threshold to stimulus intensity were derived for each DL level. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare Weber's constants between lens wearers and nonlens wearers.
RESULTS: A significant main effect of DL level on Weber's constant (P < 0.001) was observed, with the first DL being higher than following DLs. Lens wearers had higher Weber's constants than nonlens wearers (P = 0.02) However, no interaction was found between DL level and group type on Weber's constants (P = 0.38).
CONCLUSIONS: Differential sensitivity of the ocular surface can be successfully measured with a pneumatic esthesiometer and it appears that Weber's law holds for corneal nociceptive sensory processing. There are subtle differences in mechanical difference thresholds between lens wearers and nonlens wearers, suggesting the possibility of different neural activity levels in the two groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contact lens wear; detection; discrimination; ocular surface; threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24425857     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  4 in total

Review 1.  TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report.

Authors:  Carlos Belmonte; Jason J Nichols; Stephanie M Cox; James A Brock; Carolyn G Begley; David A Bereiter; Darlene A Dartt; Anat Galor; Pedram Hamrah; Jason J Ivanusic; Deborah S Jacobs; Nancy A McNamara; Mark I Rosenblatt; Fiona Stapleton; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation.

Authors:  Emmanuel B Alabi; Trefford L Simpson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Multiple Criterion and Multiple Stimulus Signal Detection Theory Analysis of Corneal Painful and Cool Pneumatic Stimuli.

Authors:  Varadharajan Jayakumar; Trefford Simpson
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Detectability and Bias Indices of Pneumatic Corneal Stimuli Using Signal Detection Theory.

Authors:  Varadharajan Jayakumar; Trefford L Simpson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.