Literature DB >> 24425718

SNAP benefits: Can an adequate benefit be defined?

Ann L Yaktine1, Julie A Caswell.   

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) increases the food purchasing power of participating households. A committee convened by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) examined the question of whether it is feasible to define SNAP allotment adequacy. Total resources; individual, household, and environmental factors; and SNAP program characteristics that affect allotment adequacy were identified from a framework developed by the IOM committee. The committee concluded that it is feasible to define SNAP allotment adequacy; however, such a definition must take into account the degree to which participants' total resources and individual, household, and environmental factors influence the purchasing power of SNAP benefits and the impact of SNAP program characteristics on the calculation of the dollar value of the SNAP allotment. The committee recommended that the USDA Food and Nutrition Service investigate ways to incorporate these factors and program characteristics into research aimed at defining allotment adequacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24425718      PMCID: PMC3884095          DOI: 10.3945/an.113.004630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  6 in total

1.  U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Barbara A Israel; Sherman A James; Shuming Bao; Mark L Wilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Associations of neighborhood characteristics with the location and type of food stores.

Authors:  Latetia V Moore; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Time scarcity and food choices: an overview.

Authors:  Jennifer Jabs; Carol M Devine
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  IOM (Institute of Medicine) and NRC (National Research Council). 2013. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Examining the Evidence to Define Benefit Adequacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  The Thrifty Food Plan is not thrifty when labor cost is considered.

Authors:  George C Davis; Wen You
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.798

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Shopping pattern and food purchase differences among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) households and Non-supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program households in the United States.

Authors:  Alison Gustafson
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Impact of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Reduction or Loss on Food-at-Home Acquisitions and Community Food Program Use.

Authors:  Namrata Sanjeevi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Barriers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Addressing Disparities in Diet-Related Cardiovascular Disease in the United States.

Authors:  Penny M Kris-Etherton; Kristina S Petersen; Gladys Velarde; Neal D Barnard; Michael Miller; Emilio Ros; James H O'Keefe; Kim Williams; Linda Van Horn; Muzi Na; Christina Shay; Paul Douglass; David L Katz; Andrew M Freeman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.