Literature DB >> 24424857

Proof of cannabis administration by sensitive detection of 11-nor-Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in hair using selective methylation and application of liquid chromatography- tandem and multistage mass spectrometry.

Detlef Thieme1, Hans Sachs, Michael Uhl.   

Abstract

The identification of 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THCCOOH) in hair represents an exceptional forensic analytical challenge due to low target concentrations in a complex matrix. Several dedicated techniques [gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-NCI-MS/MS) or GC-GC-MS couplings] were specifically introduced into forensic toxicology aiming to a selective and sensitive identification of THCCOOH in hair. The combination of liquid-chromatography (LC) and MS/MS gained an outstanding relevance in forensic toxicology (including the detection of cannabinoids). However, its application to hair matrix is characterized by a lack of specificity which is due to the unspecific decarboxylation as most abundant fragmentation reaction. Therefore, various chemical modifications of the carboxyl and/or phenolic hydroxyl groups were examined to improve the selectivity. The selective methylation of the 9-carboxyl-group proved to be the most efficient derivatization procedure. Hair extracts were redissolved in acetonitrile and after addition of few milligrams of solid sodium carbonate derivatized with 25 μL methyl iodide. The resulting THC-9-carboxymethylester was separated by conventional reverse phase LC and selectively detected using negative electrospray ionization by recording the fragmentation reactions 357➔325 and 357➔297. Resulting limits of quantification were below 100 fg/mg. A further significant improvement was achieved by application of the multistage MS3 fragmentation 357➔325➔297. To verify the validity of this procedure, a systematic quantitative comparison of THCCOOH concentrations in hair with data from a well established GC-NCI-MS/MS technique was performed. Both techniques proved to be in good accordance (R(2)=0.647, p = <0.001) and equally suitable for hair testing of THCCOOH.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cannabinoids; forensic toxicology; hair; liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; substance abuse detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24424857     DOI: 10.1002/dta.1565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  3 in total

1.  A double-blind, randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled, pilot trial with Sativex in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Jose Luis López-Sendón Moreno; Juan García Caldentey; Patricia Trigo Cubillo; Carolina Ruiz Romero; Guillermo García Ribas; M A Alonso Alonso Arias; María Jesús García de Yébenes; Rosa María Tolón; Ismael Galve-Roperh; Onintza Sagredo; Sara Valdeolivas; Eva Resel; Silvia Ortega-Gutierrez; María Laura García-Bermejo; Javier Fernández Ruiz; Manuel Guzmán; Justo García de Yébenes Prous
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Finding cannabinoids in hair does not prove cannabis consumption.

Authors:  Bjoern Moosmann; Nadine Roth; Volker Auwärter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of cannabinoids in hair with self-reported cannabis consumption in heavy, light and non-cannabis users.

Authors:  Michelle Taylor; Rosie Lees; Graeme Henderson; Anne Lingford-Hughes; John Macleod; John Sullivan; Matthew Hickman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2016-06-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.