Literature DB >> 24424569

Genetic gains from reciprocal recurrent and within-line selection for egg production in the fowl.

R E Calhoon1, B B Bohren.   

Abstract

Selection for survivors percent egg production from first egg to 40 weeks of age was conducted for six generations. Within-line selection (WLS) on the basis of an index of individual records plus sire family and dam family means was compared with reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) based on sire family selection among cross progeny. Genetically heterogeneous synthetic populations, the Cornell Control and the Purdue Pool strains were used.The responses to WLS (3.84 °) and RRS (2.57 °) were both significantly greater than zero, but were not significantly different from each other. Nevertheless, the responses were proportional to their predicted values (.363 vs. 340). The advantage of WLS was due to the mechanics of selection resulting in slightly greater selection intensity and an increased correlation between the criterion of selection and the trait being improved. On the contrary, the RRS method had a slightly larger realized heritability as would be expected in the presence of non-additive genetic variance. Four of five pure-lines selected under both methods had statistically significant declines in performance due to inbreeding depression effects. All of the results observed are comparable with known genetic theory.Some problems in comparing genetic gains from different selection methods or selection criteria are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1974        PMID: 24424569     DOI: 10.1007/BF00303478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  8 in total

1.  THE EXPECTED MEAN SQUARES IN GENETIC EXPERIMENTS WHEN ONLY ONE PARENT IS IDENTIFIED.

Authors:  B B BOHREN; H E MCKEAN; G W FRIARS
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The evaluation of new methods for the improvement of quantitative characteristics.

Authors:  A E BELL; C H MOORE; D C WARREN
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

3.  Genetic combining ability of light and heavy inbred lines in single crosses of poultry.

Authors:  E J Eisen; B B Bohren; H E McKean; S C King
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A Comparison of Purebred and Crossbred Selection Schemes with Two Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  K Kojima; T M Kelleher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Predicted response to selection for crossbred performance in mice.

Authors:  W E Vinson; E J Eisen; O W Robison
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effectiveness of alternative breeding systems for increasing rate of egg production in chickens.

Authors:  H K Saadeh; J V Craig; L T Smith; S Wearden
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Intrapopulation versus reciprocal recurrent selection in swine.

Authors:  D K Biswas; A B Chapman; N L First; H L Self
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 3.159

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.