Literature DB >> 24423436

Clinical investigation of a novel surgical device for circumcision.

Yiming Yuan1, Zhichao Zhang2, Wanshou Cui1, Bing Gao1, Jing Peng1, Zhongcheng Xin1, Yinglu Guo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of a novel device for adult circumcision, that is the circular cutter with stapled anastomosis for circumcision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 62 men with a mean ± SD age of 28 ± 8 years were enrolled from June to September 2012 to undergo circumcision using the circular cutter with stapled anastomosis. The device used 18 staples for anastomosis, which fall out during the recovery course, as designed. Patients were followed at day 3, and weeks 1, 2, 4 and 12 after the procedure. Outcome measures were evaluated, including patient safety, procedural time, patient satisfaction and complication rate.
RESULTS: Average procedural time needed to use the device was 7.7 ± 2.6 minutes. Patients returned to full physical activity on postoperative day 3. The overall complication rate was 4.8%, including 1 case of intraoperative bleeding due to operator inexperience and 2 of a delay in staples falling out. No patient experienced wound infection or excessive foreskin excision. No incision site edema was observed beyond postoperative day 7. All enrolled patients were satisfied with the postoperative penile cosmesis.
CONCLUSIONS: The circular cutter with stapled anastomosis for circumcision is a 1-step device that can achieve excellent postoperative results with minimal procedural time. Therefore, it has the potential to enable the performance of circumcision as a rapid turnover bedside procedure.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomosis; circumcision; equipment and supplies; male; penis; surgical; surgical staplers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24423436     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Male circumcision: Disposable device offers one-stop circumcision.

Authors:  Robert Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Voluntary medical male circumcision in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Tigistu Adamu; Jason B Reed; Valerian Kiggundu; Youseph Yazdi; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  PrePex Male Circumcision: Follow-Up and Outcomes during the First Two Years of Implementation at the Rwanda Military Hospital.

Authors:  Albert Ndagijimana; Pacifique Mugenzi; Dana R Thomson; Bethany Hedt-Gauthier; Jeanine U Condo; Eugene Ngoga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  X D Jin; J J Lu; W H Liu; J Zhou; R K Yu; B Yu; X J Zhang; B H Shen
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hu Han; Da-Wei Xie; Xiao-Guang Zhou; Xiao-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Subcutaneous tissue-sparing dorsal slit with new marking technique: A novel circumcision method.

Authors:  Zhao-Long Jiang; Cheng-Wen Sun; Jian Sun; Gao-Feng Shi; Hu Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.