J Bradley Layton1, Dongmei Li, Christoph R Meier, Julie L Sharpless, Til Stürmer, Susan S Jick, M Alan Brookhart. 1. Department of Epidemiology (J.B.L., T.S., M.A.B.), Sheps Center for Health Services Research (D.L., M.A.B.), and Department of Medicine (J.L.S.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (C.R.M.), University of Basel, 4003 Basel, Switzerland; and Department of Epidemiology (S.S.J.), Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02118.
Abstract
CONTEXT: New formulations, increased marketing, and wider recognition of declining testosterone levels in older age may have contributed to wider testosterone testing and supplementation in many countries. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe testosterone testing and testosterone treatment in men in the United Kingdom and United States. DESIGN: This was a retrospective incident user cohort. SETTING: We evaluated commercial and Medicare insurance claims from the United States and general practitioner healthcare records from the United Kingdom for the years 2000 through 2011. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 410,019 US men and 6858 UK men who initiated a testosterone formulation as well as 1,114,329 US men and 66,140 UK men with a new testosterone laboratory measurement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included initiation of any injected testosterone, implanted testosterone pellets, or prescribed transdermal or oral testosterone formulation. RESULTS: Testosterone testing and supplementation have increased pronouncedly in the United States. Increased testing in the United Kingdom has identified more men with low levels, yet US testing has increased among men with normal levels. Men in the United States tend to initiate at normal levels more often than in the United Kingdom, and many men initiate testosterone without recent testing. Gels have become the most common initial treatment in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone testing and use has increased over the past decade, particularly in the United States, with dramatic shifts from injections to gels. Substantial use is seen in men without recent testing and in US men with normal levels. Given widening use despite safety and efficacy questions, prescribers must consider the medical necessity of testosterone before initiation.
CONTEXT: New formulations, increased marketing, and wider recognition of declining testosterone levels in older age may have contributed to wider testosterone testing and supplementation in many countries. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe testosterone testing and testosterone treatment in men in the United Kingdom and United States. DESIGN: This was a retrospective incident user cohort. SETTING: We evaluated commercial and Medicare insurance claims from the United States and general practitioner healthcare records from the United Kingdom for the years 2000 through 2011. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 410,019 US men and 6858 UK men who initiated a testosterone formulation as well as 1,114,329 US men and 66,140 UK men with a new testosterone laboratory measurement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included initiation of any injected testosterone, implanted testosterone pellets, or prescribed transdermal or oral testosterone formulation. RESULTS:Testosterone testing and supplementation have increased pronouncedly in the United States. Increased testing in the United Kingdom has identified more men with low levels, yet US testing has increased among men with normal levels. Men in the United States tend to initiate at normal levels more often than in the United Kingdom, and many men initiate testosterone without recent testing. Gels have become the most common initial treatment in both countries. CONCLUSIONS:Testosterone testing and use has increased over the past decade, particularly in the United States, with dramatic shifts from injections to gels. Substantial use is seen in men without recent testing and in US men with normal levels. Given widening use despite safety and efficacy questions, prescribers must consider the medical necessity of testosterone before initiation.
Authors: Christina Wang; Eberhard Nieschlag; Ronald S Swerdloff; Hermann Behre; Wayne J Hellstrom; Louis J Gooren; Jean M Kaufman; Jean-Jacques Legros; Bruno Lunenfeld; Alvaro Morales; John E Morley; Claude Schulman; Ian M Thompson; Wolfgang Weidner; Frederick C W Wu Journal: Aging Male Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.892
Authors: Olga M Calof; Atam B Singh; Martin L Lee; Anne M Kenny; Randall J Urban; Joyce L Tenover; Shalender Bhasin Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Henry A Feldman; Christopher Longcope; Carol A Derby; Catherine B Johannes; Andre B Araujo; Andrea D Coviello; William J Bremner; John B McKinlay Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Frederick C W Wu; Abdelouahid Tajar; Stephen R Pye; Alan J Silman; Joseph D Finn; Terence W O'Neill; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi; Krzysztof Kula; Margus Punab; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Rebecca Vigen; Colin I O'Donnell; Anna E Barón; Gary K Grunwald; Thomas M Maddox; Steven M Bradley; Al Barqawi; Glenn Woning; Margaret E Wierman; Mary E Plomondon; John S Rumsfeld; P Michael Ho Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andre B Araujo; Gretchen R Esche; Varant Kupelian; Amy B O'Donnell; Thomas G Travison; Rachel E Williams; Richard V Clark; John B McKinlay Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alvaro Morales; Richard A Bebb; Priya Manjoo; Peter Assimakopoulos; John Axler; Christine Collier; Stacy Elliott; Larry Goldenberg; Irv Gottesman; Ethan D Grober; Gordon H Guyatt; Daniel T Holmes; Jay C Lee Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Mara Y Roth; Grace Shih; Niloufar Ilani; Christina Wang; Stephanie T Page; William J Bremner; Ronald S Swerdloff; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Diana L Blithe; John K Amory Journal: Contraception Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Cindy Ke Zhou; Shailesh Advani; Matthew Chaloux; James Todd Gibson; Mandi Yu; Marie Bradley; Robert N Hoover; Michael B Cook Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jacques Baillargeon; Randall J Urban; Yong-Fang Kuo; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Mukaila A Raji; Fei Du; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: T J Walsh; M M Shores; A E Fox; K P Moore; C W Forsberg; C E Kinsey; S R Heckbert; S Zeliadt; M L Thompson; N L Smith; A M Matsumoto Journal: Andrology Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Taylor P Kohn; Matthew R Louis; Stephen M Pickett; Mark C Lindgren; Jaden R Kohn; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Jennifer A Locke; Ryan Flannigan; Oliver P Günther; Sean Skeldon; S Larry Goldenberg Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 1.862