A Thankamony1, P H Tossavainen, A Sleigh, C Acerini, D Elleri, R N Dalton, N C Jackson, A M Umpleby, R M Williams, D B Dunger. 1. Department of Paediatrics (A.T., P.H.T., C.A., D.E., R.M.W., D.B.D.), University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom; Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre (A.S.), University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatrics (P.H.T.), University of Oulu, 90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland; WellChild Laboratory (R.N.D.), King's College London, Evelina Children's Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine (N.C.J., A.M.U.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7WG, United Kingdom; and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (D.B.D.), Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Data on the metabolic effects of GH derived from studies using GH suppression by pharmacological agents may not reflect selective actions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of GH antagonism on glucose and lipid metabolism using pegvisomant, a selective GH receptor antagonist in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 10 young adults with T1D were evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment with either 10 mg of pegvisomant or placebo. The assessments included an overnight euglycemic steady state followed by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp and used glucose and glycerol cold stable isotopes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity (IS), lipid turnover, and intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) were measured. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, pegvisomant treatment resulted in lower IGF-I levels (P < .001). During the overnight steady state, insulin requirements for euglycemia (P = .019), insulin levels (P = .008), and glucose production rates (Ra) (P = .033) were reduced. During the clamp study, glucose infusion rates (P = .031) increased and glucose Ra (P = .015) decreased whereas glucose disposal rates were unchanged. Free fatty acid levels were similar during the steady state but were lower during the clamp (P = .040) after pegvisomant. Soleus muscle IMCL decreased after treatment (P = .024); however, no change in tibialis anterior muscle was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that GH antagonism in T1D results in improved hepatic insulin sensitivity. Lack of consistent changes in free fatty acid levels may suggest a direct effect of GH on IS. Unchanged peripheral IS despite reductions in IMCL indicate that GH-induced alterations in IMCL may not be causally linked to glucose metabolism.
CONTEXT: Data on the metabolic effects of GH derived from studies using GH suppression by pharmacological agents may not reflect selective actions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of GH antagonism on glucose and lipid metabolism using pegvisomant, a selective GH receptor antagonist in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 10 young adults with T1D were evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment with either 10 mg of pegvisomant or placebo. The assessments included an overnight euglycemic steady state followed by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp and used glucose and glycerol cold stable isotopes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity (IS), lipid turnover, and intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) were measured. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, pegvisomant treatment resulted in lower IGF-I levels (P < .001). During the overnight steady state, insulin requirements for euglycemia (P = .019), insulin levels (P = .008), and glucose production rates (Ra) (P = .033) were reduced. During the clamp study, glucose infusion rates (P = .031) increased and glucose Ra (P = .015) decreased whereas glucose disposal rates were unchanged. Free fatty acid levels were similar during the steady state but were lower during the clamp (P = .040) after pegvisomant. Soleus muscle IMCL decreased after treatment (P = .024); however, no change in tibialis anterior muscle was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that GH antagonism in T1D results in improved hepatic insulin sensitivity. Lack of consistent changes in free fatty acid levels may suggest a direct effect of GH on IS. Unchanged peripheral IS despite reductions in IMCL indicate that GH-induced alterations in IMCL may not be causally linked to glucose metabolism.
Authors: Kevin C Corbit; João Paulo G Camporez; Jennifer L Tran; Camella G Wilson; Dylan A Lowe; Sarah M Nordstrom; Kirthana Ganeshan; Rachel J Perry; Gerald I Shulman; Michael J Jurczak; Ethan J Weiss Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-02-09
Authors: Melanie Cree-Green; David M Maahs; Annie Ferland; John E Hokanson; Hong Wang; Laura Pyle; Gregory L Kinney; Martina King; Robert H Eckel; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Melanie Cree-Green; Bradley R Newcomer; Mark S Brown; Amy D Baumgartner; Bryan Bergman; Brendan Drew; Judith G Regensteiner; Laura Pyle; Jane E B Reusch; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: Diabetes Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Piotr Zabielski; Ian R Lanza; Srinivas Gopala; Carrie J Holtz Heppelmann; H Robert Bergen; Surendra Dasari; K Sreekumaran Nair Journal: Diabetes Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 9.461