Literature DB >> 24423204

Three-dimensional tooth crown size symmetry in cleft lip and cleft palate.

M Okan Akcam1, Halise Aydemir, Levent Özer, Berna Özel, T Ufuk Toygar-Memikoğlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare three-dimensional tooth size symmetry in the right and left sides of upper and lower dental arches in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients and to compare it with an Angle Class I normal occlusion control group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental casts of 72 individuals with CLP (20 bilateral [BCLP], 34 unilateral left [ULCLP], and 18 unilateral right [URCLP]) and 53 individuals with Class I occlusion, all with permanent dentition, were randomly selected. Mesiodistal (MD), labiolingual (LL), and occlusogingival (OG) measurements of upper and lower teeth were recorded with a digital caliper. Descriptive statistics and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Significant asymmetries were found between the right and left sides of the dental arches in CLP as follows: MD dimension: mandibular first premolar (ULCLP, P < .01); LL dimension: mandibular first premolar (URCLP, P < .05); OG dimension: maxillary central incisor and first premolar (ULCLP, P < .05 and P < .01, respectively), central incisor (BLCLP, P < .01), mandibular canine and first premolar (ULCLP, P < .01), and first molar (ULCLP, P < .05). Tooth crown size asymmetries were also recorded in the Class I group.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant three-dimensional tooth size asymmetries were found in CLP subjects; however, such asymmetries were also present on the Class I control group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft lip and palate; Symmetry; Tooth size

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24423204      PMCID: PMC8650445          DOI: 10.2319/072013-526.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  25 in total

1.  Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion classes: a comparative study.

Authors:  Eman Alkofide; Hayder Hashim
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.065

2.  Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size.

Authors:  W S HUNTER; W R PRIEST
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1960 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Intermaxillary Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups.

Authors:  Güvenç Basaran; Murat Selek; Orhan Hamamci; Zeki Akkuş
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Human tooth-size asymmetry in cleft lip with or without cleft palate.

Authors:  J A Sofaer
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Odontometrics of the permanent teeth in cleft lip and palate: systemic size reduction and amplified asymmetry.

Authors:  S P Werner; E F Harris
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1989-01

6.  Sri Lankan cleft lip and palate study model analysis: clefts of the secondary palate.

Authors:  A McCance; D Roberts-Harry; M Sherriff; M Mars; W J Houston
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1993-03

7.  Tooth abnormalities of number and position in the permanent dentition of patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Guida Paola Genovez Tereza; Cleide Felício de Carvalho Carrara; Beatriz Costa
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-05

8.  Dental abnormalities, bone graft quality, and periodontal conditions in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate at different phases of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  G Dewinter; M Quirynen; K Heidbüchel; A Verdonck; G Willems; C Carels
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-07

9.  Abnormalities of maxillary anterior teeth in Chinese children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Moon Cheung Lai; Nigel M King; Hai Ming Wong
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-03-06

10.  Abnormalities of the maxillary incisors in children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  M Vichi; L Franchi
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.