We report the design of a nanoconstruct that can function as a cell-type independent agent by targeting the ubiquitous protein nucleolin. Gold nanostars (AuNS) loaded with high densities of nucleolin-specific DNA aptamer AS1411 (Apt-AuNS) produced anticancer effects in a panel of 12 cancer lines containing four representative subcategories. We found that the nanoconstructs could be internalized by cancer cells and trafficked to perinuclear regions. Apt-AuNS resulted in downregulation of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 mRNA expression by ca. 200% compared to cells without the nanoconstructs. The caspase 3/7 activity (apoptosis) and cell death in cancer cells treated with Apt-AuNS increased by 1.5 times and by ca. 17%, respectively, compared to cells treated with free AS1411 at over 10 times the concentration. Moreover, light-triggered release of aptamer from the AuNS further enhanced the in vitro efficacy of the nanoconstructs in the cancer line panel with a 2-fold increase in caspase activity and a 40% decrease in cell viability compared to treatment with Apt-AuNS only. In contrast, treatments of the nanoconstructs with or without light-triggered release on a panel of normal cell lines had no adverse effects.
We report the design of a nanoconstruct that can function as a cell-type independent agent by targeting the ubiquitous protein nucleolin. Gold nanostars (AuNS) loaded with high densities of nucleolin-specific DNA aptamer AS1411 (Apt-AuNS) produced anticancer effects in a panel of 12 cancer lines containing four representative subcategories. We found that the nanoconstructs could be internalized by cancer cells and trafficked to perinuclear regions. Apt-AuNS resulted in downregulation of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 mRNA expression by ca. 200% compared to cells without the nanoconstructs. The caspase 3/7 activity (apoptosis) and cell death in cancer cells treated with Apt-AuNS increased by 1.5 times and by ca. 17%, respectively, compared to cells treated with free AS1411 at over 10 times the concentration. Moreover, light-triggered release of aptamer from the AuNS further enhanced the in vitro efficacy of the nanoconstructs in the cancer line panel with a 2-fold increase in caspase activity and a 40% decrease in cell viability compared to treatment with Apt-AuNS only. In contrast, treatments of the nanoconstructs with or without light-triggered release on a panel of normal cell lines had no adverse effects.
Targeted therapy relies
on cell-surface receptors to direct anticancer
agents to tumors.[1−3] Because of the selectivity to cancer cells, this
type of treatment has shown improvements in patient quality of life
by reducing unwanted side effects of nontargeted drugs, such as those
utilized in chemotherapy.[4−6] However, cancer cell populations
within the same tumor are often diverse and exhibit various cell-surface
receptors; hence, different types of treatment are usually necessary
to eradicate all of the cancer cells.[6,7] Recurrence
rates of cancers after targeted treatment can be as high as 50%[8] because of the regeneration of cancer cells that
cannot be eliminated.[9] One solution to
overcome this problem is to target a cell-surface receptor that is
ubiquitous. Nucleolin has recently been investigated as a surface
receptor that can also transport targeting molecules from the plasma
membrane to the nucleus of cancer cells.[10,11] The overexpression of nucleolin on the cell surface and in the cytoplasm
of exponentially growing cells suggests that this protein, whose one
of the primary roles is to shuttle molecules between the nucleus and
the cytoplasm, can function as a receptor for cell-type independent
targeted cancer treatment.[11−14]Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are the key anticancer
agents employed
in targeted therapy; however, off-target effects and immunogenic responses
can result in severe side effects.[15] One
emerging alternative to mAbs is aptamers, synthetic oligonucleotides
that can fold and bind to specific moieties on targeted molecules.[16,17] The DNA aptamer AS1411 (26-mer, 7.8 kDa) has shown high binding
affinity to nucleolin (Kd is in pM to
low nM range)[10] via its G-quadruplex structure.
One important function of nucleolin is binding to the AU-rich components
in the 3′-untranslated region of the antiapoptotic gene Bcl-2
mRNA as protection against mRNA degradation.[18,19] Free AS1411 can bind to nucleolin in the same area where nucleolin
stabilizes Bcl-2 mRNA; hence, destabilization and subsequent down-regulation
of Bcl-2 by AS1411 can result in apoptosis.[20] AS1411 has been tested in clinical trials for leukemia[21] and renal cell cancer;[22] however, there are some concerns based of fast clearance and premature
degradation (half-life ∼5 h).[16,20,23−25]To improve the stability
of AS1411, we recently reported a strategy
to attach AS1411 (Apt denotes the homodimer form) to the surface of
gold nanostars (AuNS).[26] We found that
high loading densities of Apt on the AuNS increased the overall stability
of aptamers in physiological environments, similar to other reports
of nucleic acids on spherical gold particles.[27] We evaluated aptamer-loaded AuNS (Apt-AuNS) in HeLa (cervical) cancer
cells as a model system and were able to observe effects from the
nanoconstruct interacting with the cell nucleus.[26] Apt-AuNS was trafficked by nucleolin from the cell surface
to the perinuclear regions and induced folding of the nuclear envelope.[26] We demonstrated that these changes in nuclear
phenotype could be directly correlated with disruption of cellular
function, including increased double-stranded DNA breaks in the nucleus
as well as escalation of caspase 3/7 activity and cell death.[26] The potential of Apt-AuNS as a general anticancer
agent, however, has not been tested.Here, we report that Apt-AuNS
can function as a nanoconstruct resulting
in in vitro efficacies superior to that of free aptamer
biomolecules in a wide range of cancer cells. This study is the first
to show that G-quadruplex aptamer homodimer-loaded nanoparticles can
be effective in four major cancer subcategories. We found that nucleolin
was abundant in plasma membrane and cytoplasm extracts of a 12-cancer
cell panel. Expression of surface nucleolin was also higher in cancer
cells compared to normal cells. Incubation of the cancer-cell panel
with Apt-AuNS resulted in cellular uptake that was quantified by inductively
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The reformulation of AS1411
by grafting to AuNS enhanced the anticancer effects in all cancer
cell lines with a 17% higher average cell death compared to free AS1411
exceeding 10 times the concentration. We also discovered that downregulation
of Bcl-2 mRNA expression was a contributing factor to apoptosis. Furthermore,
the in vitro efficacy of Apt-AuNS was improved by
detaching aptamers from the AuNS nanocarrier inside cancer cells.
Using ultrafast laser light to trigger the release of Apt, we showed
that the average percentage of cell death increased to 65%, which
is 55% higher compared to that of free AS1411 at over 10 times the
concentration.
Results and Discussion
Ubiquitous Expression of
Nucleolin in Plasma Membrane and Cytoplasm
of Cancer Cells
Because overexpression of nucleolin in the
plasma membrane and cytoplasm is crucial for cellular uptake and trafficking
of AS1411,[13,14] we first determined the non-nuclear
nucleolin (cytoplasmic and plasma membrane) levels in a 12-cancer
line panel using immunoblotting (Supporting Information, Materials and Methods). The cancer panel consisted of four types
of subcategories: carcinoma, sarcoma, melanoma, and glioblastoma.
We also included a control panel with three lines: HS-27 (skin fibroblast),
WI-38 (lung fibroblast), and MCF-10A (epithelial mammary cell). We
observed that the levels of full-length nucleolin (106 kDa) and its
proteolysis product (98 kDa) in fibroblast-like cancer cells (HT-1080,
fibrosarcoma and SK-MEL-2, melanoma) were up to four times higher
compared to normal fibroblast cells (HS-27 and WI-38) (Figure 1). Regarding epithelial cells, the expression of
nucleolin in cancer cells was 10 times higher on average than that
of MCF-10A cells (Figure 1). The relative amounts
of nucleolin were normalized to the expression of the housekeeping
protein, β-actin. Although minimal expression of nucleolin was
found in MCF-10A, high nucleolin levels in the non-nuclear extracts
of HS-27 and WI-38 fibroblasts were seen (Figure 1B). This observation suggests that a normal cell panel containing
both fibroblast and epithelial cells is necessary to assess effects
of Apt-AuNS on different types of tissues.
Figure 1
Nucleolin expression
in non-nuclear extracts of cancer and normal
cells. (A) Full-length (106 kDa) and the proteolysis product (98 kDa)
of nucleolin appear in the non-nuclear lysates of all cancer cells.
(B) MCF-10A cells show minimal expression of nucleolin, while fibroblast
cells show nucleolin expression comparable to cancer cells.
Nucleolin expression
in non-nuclear extracts of cancer and normal
cells. (A) Full-length (106 kDa) and the proteolysis product (98 kDa)
of nucleolin appear in the non-nuclear lysates of all cancer cells.
(B) MCF-10A cells show minimal expression of nucleolin, while fibroblast
cells show nucleolin expression comparable to cancer cells.
Synthesis and Characterization
of Aptamer-Loaded Gold Nanoconstructs
Apt-AuNS is a biocompatible
nanoconstruct that has demonstrated
excellent in vitro efficacy in HeLa cells.[26] The AuNS carrier was synthesized by reducing
a gold precursor (HAuCl4) in HEPES buffer, where HEPES
acts as both a reducing agent as well as a shape-directing agent.
The absence of surfactant in the AuNS synthesis is a major advantage
over typical syntheses of gold particles, which require citrate ions
or cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) for stabilization; however,
these molecules are toxic to healthy cells.[28−30] In addition,
AuNS contains multiple branches (typically 2–9) that range
in length from 10 to 65 nm (Figure 2A–B).
The average hydrodynamic diameter measured by DLS was 39.2 ±
6 nm (Table S1). Because of this unique
shape, extinction spectra of the nanoparticle suspension revealed
that the localized surface plasmon resonance of AuNS was centered
around 800 nm (Figure S1). This resonance
can be tuned within the near-infrared (700–860 nm) region by
controlling the size and shape of the gold nanostars by varying the
concentration of HEPES buffer relative to HAuCl4.[26,31] Important for potential in vivo work, the simplicity
of synthesis, which only involves two reagents, can be easily scaled
to 5 L (Figure 2C).
Figure 2
Gold nanostars (AuNS)
as a drug delivery platform. (A) TEM image
of multibranched AuNS. (B) Higher magnification TEM image of a representative
AuNS shape, whose average hydrodynamic diameter is ca. 40 nm. (C)
Scaled-up production of Apt-AuNS indicating that up to 5 L of Apt-AuNS
can be synthesized in an hour.
Gold nanostars (AuNS)
as a drug delivery platform. (A) TEM image
of multibranched AuNS. (B) Higher magnification TEM image of a representative
AuNS shape, whose average hydrodynamic diameter is ca. 40 nm. (C)
Scaled-up production of Apt-AuNS indicating that up to 5 L of Apt-AuNS
can be synthesized in an hour.To synthesize the nanoconstructs, thiolated AS1411 was attached
to the AuNS surface via gold–sulfur bonds in a 2-day “salt-aging”
process (Supporting Information, Materials
and Methods). The average hydrodynamic diameter of Apt-AuNS increased
from 39.2 to 44.6 nm, and the surface charge decreased from −33.1
to −29.4 mV. Although we might have expected the surface charge
to increase, the high concentrations of sodium ions surrounding the
nanoconstructs tend to screen the negatively charged DNA.[32] Using a fluorescence calibration assay with
Cy5-labeled AS1411 (Supporting Information, Materials and Methods), we determined that there were ca. 110 strands
of AS1411 on the surface of each AuNS. We found that Apt-AuNS was
stable in aqueous solutions (e.g., DI water, PBS, HEPES buffer) at
room temperature over two months (Figure S1).
Uptake of Apt-AuNS in Cancer and Normal Cells
Previous
work revealed a 7 h incubation time with 0.3 nM Apt-AuNS was sufficient
to deliver in vitro IC50 dosages of the
nanoconstruct to HeLa cells.[26] Therefore,
we used the same conditions to screen the 12-cancer cell line panel.
To visualize uptake by confocal fluorescence microscopy, we labeled
the 5′-end of Apt with Cy5 dye prior to attaching the aptamer
to the AuNS (Cy5-Apt-AuNS). Figure 3A shows
localization of the Cy5-Apt-AuNS (red fluorescence) in the cytoplasm
and near the DAPI-stained nucleus (blue fluorescence) in all cancer
cells. Also, surprisingly, we observed Cy5-Apt-AuNS signals in the
cytoplasm of normal cells, especially the fibroblasts (Figure 3B). This uptake of Apt-AuNS in fibroblasts is consistent
with a recent report that found high uptake of free AS1411 was possible
in HS-27 via a different endocytosis mechanism from that in cancer
cells.[33]
Figure 3
Uptake of Apt-AuNS in 12-cancer cell line
panel and 3-normal cell
line panel. Cy5-labeled Apt-AuNS (red) in the cytoplasm and near DAPI-stained
nuclei (blue) in (A) cancer cells and (B) normal cells suggest that
Apt-AuNS can be internalized. Cells are arranged in order of increased
doubling time. All images were collected at the same magnification.
Confocal images are 30 μm × 30 μm. Cancer cell panel:
HCT-116 (colon), HT-1080 (connective tissue), A-549 (lung), HeLa (cervix),
MCF-7 (breast), U-87 (brain), DU-145 (prostate), MDA-MB-231 (breast),
SK-MEL-2 (skin), SKOV-3 (ovary), PANC-1 (pancreas), A-498 (kidney).
Normal cell panel: MCF-10A (epithelial mammary), WI-38 (lung fibroblast),
HS-27 (skin fibroblast).
Uptake of Apt-AuNS in 12-cancer cell line
panel and 3-normal cell
line panel. Cy5-labeled Apt-AuNS (red) in the cytoplasm and near DAPI-stained
nuclei (blue) in (A) cancer cells and (B) normal cells suggest that
Apt-AuNS can be internalized. Cells are arranged in order of increased
doubling time. All images were collected at the same magnification.
Confocal images are 30 μm × 30 μm. Cancer cell panel:
HCT-116 (colon), HT-1080 (connective tissue), A-549 (lung), HeLa (cervix),
MCF-7 (breast), U-87 (brain), DU-145 (prostate), MDA-MB-231 (breast),
SK-MEL-2 (skin), SKOV-3 (ovary), PANC-1 (pancreas), A-498 (kidney).
Normal cell panel: MCF-10A (epithelial mammary), WI-38 (lung fibroblast),
HS-27 (skin fibroblast).To quantify cellular internalization of Apt-AuNS in the panel,
we measured the Au content using ICP-MS (Supporting
Information, Materials and Methods). The highest level of Au
content (24 ppt/cell) was found in PANC-1 (pancreatic cancer) cells,
which was 12 times higher than that in normal MCF-10A (2 ppt/cell)
(Figure 4). The Au content in fibroblasts (10
ppt/cell) was also much higher than that in MCF-10A cells (Figure 4). These quantitative results were in agreement
with confocal microscopy images (Figure 3),
where significantly higher Cy5 signals were observed in cancer cells
and fibroblasts compared to MCF-10A cells. We expected that increased
nucleolin expression would correlate with increased Au content across
the cancer cell panel; however, no clear correlation between these
two factors was observed. We hypothesize that cellular uptake can
also depend on other factors, such as the doubling time of the cells,
since cells tend to take up different amounts of particles at different
stages of the cell cycle.[34] For example,
HCT-116 cells have a much shorter doubling time (15 h) compared to
HT-1080 cells (27 h). Thus, there is more time for HT-1080 cells to
accumulate nanoconstructs, and uptake of Apt-AuNS was not directly
proportional to nucleolin expression.
Figure 4
Apt-AuNS uptake and expression of nucleolin
in plasma membrane
and cytoplasmic in cancer and normal cells. Higher Au content and
expression of non-nuclear nucleolin was found in cancer and fibroblast
cell lines compared to mammary epithelial cells.
Apt-AuNS uptake and expression of nucleolin
in plasma membrane
and cytoplasmic in cancer and normal cells. Higher Au content and
expression of non-nuclear nucleolin was found in cancer and fibroblast
cell lines compared to mammary epithelial cells.To determine whether there were differences in how Apt-AuNS
were
internalized by fibroblast cells and cancer cells, we used immunoblotting
to compare the levels of nucleolin in the plasma membrane of normal
and cancer cells. Although the non-nuclear nucleolin levels in the
fibroblasts were comparable to that in cancer cells, plasma membrane
extracts of HS-27 were much lower than those in HeLa and HT-1080 cells
(Figure S2). Hence, the lack of nucleolin
in plasma membranes of normal cells suggests that uptake is independent
of surface-nucleolin and occurs through other endocytosis pathways,
similar to previous reports.[33]
Decreased Bcl-2
mRNA Expression in Cancer Cells Incubated with
Apt-AuNS
As described previously, AS1411 can bind to nucleolin
and result in the downregulation of Bcl-2 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231breast cancer cells.[20] Using quantitative
real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), we examined whether
Apt-AuNS could also reduce Bcl-2 expression in other types of cancer
cells by binding to nucleolin (Supporting Information, Materials and Methods). Compared to untreated cancer cells, the
levels of Bcl-2 mRNA were reduced by at least two times in HT-1080
cells and up to four times in PANC-1 cells after incubation with Apt-AuNS
(Figure 5). These decreases in gene expression
are similar to that reported in breast cancer cells (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231)
after continuous treatment with 5 μM of free AS1411 for 72 h.[20] Importantly, the levels of Bcl-2 mRNA in all
normal cells remained unchanged despite high Apt-AuNS uptake by the
fibroblasts. Although Apt-AuNS can enter both normal and cancer cells,
we expect the uptake to occur by different mechanisms based on previous
reports of free AS1411.[33] We hypothesize
that these differences can help explain why a reduction in Bcl-2 mRNA
expression is observed in cancer cells but not in normal cells after
treatment with Apt-AuNS (Figure 5). In effect,
the nucleolin confined in and near the nucleus is not interacting
with the nanoconstruct, and the levels of Bcl-2 will remain unchanged.
Figure 5
Downregulation
of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 gene in cancer cells after
treatment with Apt-AuNS. A 400% reduction of Bcl-2 mRNA expression
was observed in PANC-1 cancer cells after treatment with 0.3 nM Apt-AuNS
(33 nM AS1411) compared to untreated cancer cells. Gene expression
was reduced further (200% to 1500%) in cancer cells after a single
treatment with Apt-AuNS + hν. Only seven out
of 12 cancer cells (HCT-116, HT-1080, HeLa, MDA-MB-231, PANC-1, SK-MEL-2,
and U-87) treated with 450 nM free AS1411 decreased by minimal amounts.
No change of Bcl-2 mRNA levels was found in normal cells. p-values were determined using a one-way ANOVA test. (*)
and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.1, respectively.
Downregulation
of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 gene in cancer cells after
treatment with Apt-AuNS. A 400% reduction of Bcl-2 mRNA expression
was observed in PANC-1cancer cells after treatment with 0.3 nM Apt-AuNS
(33 nM AS1411) compared to untreated cancer cells. Gene expression
was reduced further (200% to 1500%) in cancer cells after a single
treatment with Apt-AuNS + hν. Only seven out
of 12 cancer cells (HCT-116, HT-1080, HeLa, MDA-MB-231, PANC-1, SK-MEL-2,
and U-87) treated with 450 nM free AS1411 decreased by minimal amounts.
No change of Bcl-2 mRNA levels was found in normal cells. p-values were determined using a one-way ANOVA test. (*)
and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.1, respectively.Because Bcl-2 mRNA functions as an antiapoptotic gene that
prevents
cancer cells from entering programmed cell death, downregulation of
Bcl-2 expression can trigger apoptosis.[35] When cells undergo apoptosis, their caspase activities are often
elevated.[36] We measured the caspase 3/7
activity of the 12-cancer cell panel (Supporting
Information, Materials and Methods) and found that the caspase
activities increased by ca. 1.5 times after a single 7 h incubation
with Apt-AuNS. Note: we define the time after this 7 h incubation
and after removal of the nanoconstructs as time t = 0. At t = 72 h, when control populations were
close to 100% confluent, the activity of the proteases increased up
to four times in HCT-116 (colon cancer) cells relative to untreated
cells (Figure 6, blue bar). Cell viability
was measured using a Cell-titer Blue assay to determine the percentage
of live cells in the population (Supporting Information, Materials and Methods). Seventy-two hours after Apt-AuNS incubation,
the average cell viability decreased by 25% (Figure 7, blue bar). The highest amount of cell death (ca. 40%) was
recorded in SK-MEL-2 and DU-145 cells.
Figure 6
Elevation of
caspase 3/7 activity in cancer cells after treatment
with Apt-AuNS and Apt-AuNS + hν. Higher increases
in caspase activities (up to 6-fold) are observed in all cancer cells
treated with Apt-AuNS + hν. Up to a 4-fold
increase of caspase 3/7 activities after treatment with Apt-AuNS indicates
that large populations of cancer cells entered apoptosis. Negligible
increase in caspase 3/7 activities in cancer cells from treatment
with 450 nM AS1411 (less than 1.5-fold). Notably, there are no significant
adverse effects observed in normal cells after exposure to laser irradiation. p-values were determined using one-way ANOVA test. Lines
over bars indicate groups that are not significantly different.
Figure 7
Light-triggered release of Apt from AuNS increases
the percentage
cell death. Cell viability analysis showed a 70% decrease of cell
viability after aptamer release. Approximately 25% decrease in cell
viability after treated with Apt-AuNS. Cancer cells treated with 450
nM of free AS1411 showed reduced effects on cell death (less than
10%) compared to those treated with 0.3 nM Apt-AuNS (33 nM AS1411)
and three times lower than that from light-triggered treatment. No
significant cell death was observed in any of the normal cell lines. p-values were determined using a one-way ANOVA test. Lines
over bars indicate groups that are not significantly different. (*)
and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.1, respectively.
In Vitro Therapeutic Effects Generated by nM
Concentration of Apt-AuNS
Previously, we discovered that
conjugating AS1411 onto AuNS carriers resulted in reduced dosages
for efficacy in HeLa cells; low nM concentrations of Apt-AuNS[26] produced anticancer effects similar to μM
of free AS1411.[16,37] We were interested in whether
the in vitro efficacy of 0.3 nM Apt-AuNS (33 nM of
Apt, ca. 110 strands per AuNS) in the 12-cancer cell lines would also
be superior to free AS1411 at over 10 times the concentration. First,
we observed an average reduction of 2 times of Bcl-2 mRNA expression
in cancer cells treated with Apt-AuNS compared to those treated with
free AS1411 (1.5 times) (Figure 5 and Table S1). These results suggest that Apt-AuNS
can increase the destabilization of Bcl-2 mRNA and require less than
a tenth of the aptamer dose.In addition, the caspase 3/7 activity
levels in cancer cells incubated with Apt-AuNS increased by 1.4 times
compared to those with free AS1411 (Figure 6). Cell viability assays
also indicated an average of 17% higher cancer cell death 72 h after
incubation with Apt-AuNS than with free AS1411 (Figure 7 and Table S1). We attribute the superior biological effects of
Apt-AuNS over free aptamer to two main factors: (1) Reformulation
of AS1411 as Apt-AuNS. The nanoconstruct is more stable in physiological
environments and the tight packing of Apt on the AuNS surface makes
the aptamer less susceptible to degradation by serum or DNase compared
to free Apt. Hence, the effects of Apt-AuNS could persist up to 72
h. (2) High local concentration of AS1411 uptake. Since each nanoconstruct
can transport over 100 strands of AS1411 into cancer cells, high local
concentrations of Apt can be internalized by cancer cells.Elevation of
caspase 3/7 activity in cancer cells after treatment
with Apt-AuNS and Apt-AuNS + hν. Higher increases
in caspase activities (up to 6-fold) are observed in all cancer cells
treated with Apt-AuNS + hν. Up to a 4-fold
increase of caspase 3/7 activities after treatment with Apt-AuNS indicates
that large populations of cancer cells entered apoptosis. Negligible
increase in caspase 3/7 activities in cancer cells from treatment
with 450 nM AS1411 (less than 1.5-fold). Notably, there are no significant
adverse effects observed in normal cells after exposure to laser irradiation. p-values were determined using one-way ANOVA test. Lines
over bars indicate groups that are not significantly different.Light-triggered release of Apt from AuNS increases
the percentage
cell death. Cell viability analysis showed a 70% decrease of cell
viability after aptamer release. Approximately 25% decrease in cell
viability after treated with Apt-AuNS. Cancer cells treated with 450
nM of free AS1411 showed reduced effects on cell death (less than
10%) compared to those treated with 0.3 nM Apt-AuNS (33 nM AS1411)
and three times lower than that from light-triggered treatment. No
significant cell death was observed in any of the normal cell lines. p-values were determined using a one-way ANOVA test. Lines
over bars indicate groups that are not significantly different. (*)
and (**) indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.1, respectively.
Light-Triggered Release of Apt from AuNS Increases Efficacy
of in Vitro Treatment
Light-triggered release
of Apt from AuNS near the cancer cell nucleus was found to increase in vitro therapeutic efficacy.[26] Our hypothesis is that this tandem treatment, where cancer cells
are first incubated with Apt-AuNS and then exposed to fs pulses for
2 s (Apt-AuNS + hv) could also enhance in
vitro efficacy compared to Apt-AuNS only in the cancer cell
panel. First, we evaluated whether Apt-AuNS + hv interfered
with nucleolin-Bcl-2 mRNA interactions. We found an average of 3.6
times reduction of Bcl-2 mRNA expression, and this reduction was as
high as 15 times in PANC-1 cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 5, hatched bar). The expression of Bcl-2 mRNA in
cancer cells treated with Apt-AuNS + hν was
1.6 times lower than that with only Apt-AuNS (Figure 5 and Table S1). These significant
reductions in Bcl-2 mRNA expression suggest that intracellular release
of high local concentration of Apt can further degrade the mRNA. The
intracellular release of Apt also showed superior anticancer effects,
where the average amount of cell death induced by Apt-AuNS + hν increased by 55% compared to free AS1411 and 40%
compared to Apt-AuNS only. The viability assay showed ca. 70% cell
death in U-87, MCF-7, PANC-1 and A-498 (renal cancer) cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 7, hatched bars),
which is comparable to the levels of cell death achieved in MCF-7
cells three days after a single dose of 10 μM free AS1411.[20] Furthermore, the caspase activities of all cancer
cells treated with Apt-AuNS + hν increased
by an average of 3.4 times compared to 1.6 times with Apt-AuNS alone
(p < 0.1) (Figure 6 and Table S1). This drastic increase of efficacy
can be attributed to a highly localized concentration of Apt detached
from nanocarriers by light-triggered release. Therefore, this tandem
strategy can result in potent effects that require only minimal amounts
of AS1411 (∼33 nM) and that surpass results from μM concentrations
of free AS1411.
Conclusions
In summary, we have
reported a drug-loaded nanoconstruct—Apt-AuNS—that
exhibits in vitro anticancer effects in a 12-cancer
cell line panel with four major subcategories. We showed that the
protein nucleolin is a viable surface target for Apt-AuNS by measuring
expression in the plasma membrane and cytoplasm of the cancer cells.
By binding to surface nucleolin, Apt-AuNS was taken up by 12 cancer
lines. Importantly, the loading of AS1411 onto AuNS nanocarriers significantly
improved the in vitro efficacy as a result of increased
aptamer (drug) stability and presentation of high local concentrations
of AS1411. Similar to free AS1411, Apt-AuNS resulted in downregulation
of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 gene expression, elevation of apoptosis signals,
and increased cell death in the panel. Light-triggered release further
enhanced the in vitro efficacy by making available
high local concentrations of Apt near the nucleus. Since Apt-AuNS
shows anticancer effects on the 12-cancer cell line panel mediated
by the ubiquitous protein nucleolin, we anticipate that this nanoconstruct
can act as a platform for a new class of cell-type independent agents
that could address some current challenges in targeted therapy.
Experimental
Section
The full experimental details are provided in the Supporting Information. The most important information
is
summarized briefly below.
Cell Culture
All cultures were grown
in a humidified
incubator maintained at 37 °C with 95% air/5% CO2.
All cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection.
Synthesis of AuNS and Apt-AuNS
Gold nanostars (AuNS)
were synthesized by reducing Au (III) chlorate in HEPES buffer to
create biocompatible, surfactant-free gold nanoparticles for in vitro studies. The synthesis of Apt-AuNS was performed
as previously reported.[24] The resonance
wavelength of the AuNS and Apt-AuNS was measured using UV–vis
spectroscopy. Particle size was determined using transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS).
Quantifying
Number of AS1411 Strands on AuNS
Cy5-labeled
aptamer 5′-(C6-S-S-C6)- Cy5-TTG GTG GTG GTG GTT GTG GTG GTG
GTG G-3′ (Cy5-Apt) was used to estimate the number of aptamers
on each particle. Attachment of Cy5-Apt to the AuNS followed the same
procedure as described previously. Cy5-Apt-AuNS were treated with
potassium cyanide (KCN) overnight to dissolve the Au core of the nanoconstruct
and release Cy5 aptamer into the solution. The Cy5 fluorescence intensity
of the KCN solution was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer,
and the concentration of AS1411 was determined based on the intensity
of the Cy5 signal. This fluorescent assay indicated that approximately
110 strands of AS1411 were conjugated on a single AuNS.
Immunoblotting
of Nucleolin
Cancer and normal cells
were harvested from cell culture flasks. To determine expression of
cytosolic nucleolin in cancer and normal cells, we lysed the cells
on ice for 15 min in 5% NP40 lysis buffer (Invitrogen), followed by
centrifugation at 10 000 g for 20 min. The
supernatant contained the cytosolic extract, and the pellet contained
the nuclear components. For plasma membrane extraction, cancer and
normal cells were lysed in homogenized buffer (Abcam) and homogenized
50 times on ice using a Dounce homogenizer. Protein concentrations
after the extractions were determined by the Bradford assay (Pierce).
Aliquots of the cytosolic extracts containing 20 μg of protein
were electrophoresed on a 10% Tris-HCl gel (Bio Rad) and transblotted
using polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore). Antihuman
nucleolin mAb (clone MS-3) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and antimouse
actin polyclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) were used to label nucleolin
and the housekeeping protein β-actin. The blot was stained with
alkaline phosphatase-IgG secondary antibody. The bands were developed
using enhanced chemifluorescence substrate (GE Healthcare) and visualized
by Typhoon PhosphorImager (GE Healthcare). The amount of each protein
in the blots was determined by counting the total number of pixels
in each band (integrated density value). Values of nucleolin that
were within the linear range of the assay were normalized to β-actin
for the cytosolic extracts.
Confocal Imaging of Cy5-Labeled Nanoconstructs
Cells
were incubated with 0.3 nM Cy5-labeled Apt-AuNS for 7 h and then washed
three times with PBS. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
(Sigma Aldrich). A drop of ProLong Gold Antifade reagent containing
DAPI (Invitrogen) was used to mount each coverslip on a glass slide
for confocal imaging. Confocal imaging was performed on an inverted
Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 confocal microscope with a 40× objective
and Zen acquisition software.
Quantification of Nanoconstruct
Uptake in Cells
The
cells were incubated with the nanoconstructs for 7 h at 37 °C
in 5% CO2 environment. After 7 h, excess Apt-AuNS were
removed from the wells, and the cells were washed twice with ice cold
PBS (Invitrogen). The cells were then harvested and suspended in 100
μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were counted
before being digested for 4 h at 75 °C in acid mixture containing
30% HCl (Sigma-Aldrich) and 70% HNO3 (Sigma-Aldrich). After
complete digestion of the AuNS, the solution was diluted with Millipore
water. The Au content was measured using ICP-MS.
Quantification
of Bcl-2 mRNA Expression
Real-time polymerase
chain reaction (qPCR) was used to quantify mRNA expression in cancer
and normal cells. The assay was conducted using Power SYBR Green Cells-to-Ct
Kit (Invitrogen). Cells were lysed using RNA lysis solution (Invitrogen).
RNA lysates were reverse transcribed to synthesize cDNA. Primers for
qPCR were designed using freely available software from IDT DNA. Identified
primers were purchased from IDT DNA and tested for the amplification
of a single uniform amplicon through analysis of SYBR melting curves
for two cell lines (HeLa and A-549). All qPCR reactions were performed
in 20 μL reaction mixtures. Each sample was run in triplicate
with the IQ5 qPCR system (Bio-Rad). Each plate probed the expression
of Bcl-2 and ACTB genes in the target cell lines. Real-time PCR data
were analyzed using the comparative CT method, also known
as the 2–ΔΔC method, in
which the expression of Bcl-2 mRNA was normalized to the expression
of the housekeeping gene ACTB.
Biological Assays To Measure
Caspase 3/7 Activity and Cell Viability
Apo-ONE Homogeneous
Caspase-3/7 assay kit (Promega) and Cell-Titer
Blue Cell viability assay (Promega) were used to measure caspase 3/7
activity and cell viability, respectively, in cancer and normal cells
after treatment with Apt-AuNS, Apt-AuNS + hν, and 450 nM free AS1411.
Authors: Duncan Hieu M Dam; Jung Heon Lee; Patrick N Sisco; Dick T Co; Ming Zhang; Michael R Wasielewski; Teri W Odom Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Virna Dapić; Paula J Bates; John O Trent; Alison Rodger; Shelia D Thomas; Donald M Miller Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Matthew D Massich; David A Giljohann; Abrin L Schmucker; Pinal C Patel; Chad A Mirkin Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Ara G Hovanessian; Calaiselvy Soundaramourty; Diala El Khoury; Isabelle Nondier; Josette Svab; Bernard Krust Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Khaled S Allemailem; Ahmad Almatroudi; Mohammed A Alsahli; Ghaiyda Talal Basfar; Faris Alrumaihi; Arshad Husain Rahmani; Amjad Ali Khan Journal: 3 Biotech Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Helena de Puig; Justina O Tam; Chun-Wan Yen; Lee Gehrke; Kimberly Hamad-Schifferli Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Duncan Hieu M Dam; Hyojin Lee; Raymond C Lee; Ki Hun Kim; Neil L Kelleher; Teri W Odom Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Danielle M Valcourt; Jenna Harris; Rachel S Riley; Megan Dang; Jianxin Wang; Emily S Day Journal: Nano Res Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 8.897
Authors: Duncan Hieu M Dam; Kayla S B Culver; Irawati Kandela; Raymond C Lee; Kavita Chandra; Hyojin Lee; Christine Mantis; Andrey Ugolkov; Andrew P Mazar; Teri W Odom Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: E Merit Reyes-Reyes; Francesca R Šalipur; Mitra Shams; Matthew K Forsthoefel; Paula J Bates Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 6.603