| Literature DB >> 24422750 |
Young-Min Kim, Boncho Ku, Chang Jin Jung, Jaeuk U Kim, Young Ju Jeon, Keun Ho Kim, Jong Yeol Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human skin properties have been used as an important diagnostic component in traditional medicine as they change with health conditions. Sasang constitutional medicine (SCM) puts emphasis on the recognition of the constitution-specific skin features prior to the diagnostic decision of health. In this work, in search of skin-characteristics effectively reflecting SCM features, we compared several skin properties such as perspiration, visco-elasticity, elasticity, and elasticity hysteresis, in several candidate body parts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24422750 PMCID: PMC3897972 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Demographic survey results according to SC types
| | | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 57.5 (5.7) | 56.1 (4.8) | 0.1963 |
| Height (cm) | 157.2 (5.2) | 156 (4.7) | 0.2229 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.3 (7.2) | 50.8 (5.3) | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.2 (2.6) | 20.8 (1.8) | <0.0001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 126 (16.9) | 113.2 (15.2) | <0.0001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 75.4 (9.9) | 69.5 (9.1) | <0.01 |
| Pulse (time/min) | 70.8 (8.8) | 68.9 (7.4) | 0.237 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 36.4 (0.3) | 36.4 (0.2) | 0.9246 |
Values are represented as the mean (standard deviation), P-values for each variable are derived from the result of the independent two sample t-test. BMI: body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
Summary of ANCOVA for each measured skin variables for two constitution groups
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.025 (0.087) | 3.360 (0.103) | 68.867*** | 0.002 | 24.530*** | |
| 10.780 (0.200) | 10.553 (0.236) | 0.719 | 0.113 | 0.579 | |
| 0.135 (0.002) | 0.147 (0.003) | 0.105 | 0.724 | 10.364** | |
| 42.225 (0.347) | 42.409 (0.407) | 0.437 | 0.153 | 0.118 | |
| 41.073 (0.262) | 39.856 (0.307) | 0.081 | 1.175 | 9.050** | |
| 36.462 (0.363) | 36.650 (0.426) | 0.003 | 0.131 | 0.112 | |
| 2.761 (0.621) | 3.197 (0.727) | 0.088 | 1.499 | 0.206 | |
| 1.152 (0.323) | 2.553 (0.378) | 0.888 | 1.703 | 7.892** | |
| 4.611 (0.419) | 3.206 (0.491) | 0.049 | 0.984 | 4.710* | |
Values in the second and third column indicate the adjusted mean (standard error: S.E). The adjusted means for each skin feature were estimated without the interaction term in the ANCOVA models. F statistics for the effects of age and SC groups are provided in the third and the last column, respectively.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 1Estimated effect sizes for nine skin features. Each effect size (ES) was calculated using the following formula: , where , represent adjusted means for the TE and SE groups, respectively, and s indicates the square root of the pooled variance of the TE and SE groups. Pooled variances for each skin feature were obtained using the mean squared error of each ANCOVA model.
Figure 2Scatterplot matrix and density plots corresponding to all pairs of the four significant skin features. All skin features are scaled to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Scatterplots and density plots are illustrated in the lower triangular and upper triangular elements of the matrix plot, respectively. Blue circles and orange triangles on the scatterplots denote samples in the TE group and SE the group, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients from the four skin features are denoted in the top left of the density plots.
Figure 3Scatter plot of the TE and SE groups in a 3 dimensional skin feature space.
Area under the ROC curves and prediction accuracy based on 10-fold cross validation
| Model 1 | 0.721 (0.011) | 0.628 (0.013) |
| Model 2 | 0.674 (0.012) | 0.632 (0.013) |
| Model 3 | 0.759 (0.009) | 0.695 (0.014) |
| Model 4 | 0.764 (0.010) | 0.707 (0.012) |
Values indicate the average value and standard deviation of cross validated AUC and Accuracy.
Model 1: V + E .
Model 2:P + P .
Model 3: V + E + P + P .
Model 4:V + E + PC1.
AUC: area under the ROC curves.