Epitope mapping of two major inhalant allergens, Der p I and Der f I, from mites of the genus Dermatophagoides.

The repertoire of antigenic sites on two major dust mite allergens, Der p I of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Der f I of D. farinae, was studied using murine (BALB/c) monoclonal antibodies (Mab), polyclonal rabbit IgG antibodies, and human IgE antibodies. Fifty-three IgG Mab were analyzed from six different fusions (five vs Der p I, one vs Der f I). By antigen binding radioimmunoassay (RIA), most Mab were either Der p I or Der f I specific, and only 2/53 bound to both allergens. Epitope mapping studies using cold Mab to inhibit the binding of six 125I labeled Mab to solid phase allergen defined four nonrepeated, nonoverlapping epitopes on Der p I, a single species-specific epitope on Der f I and a cross-reacting epitope present on each allergen. All but one of the 53 Mab bound to one of these six epitopes. Seventy percent (25/35) of anti-Der p I Mab were directed to the same epitope, suggesting that this epitope is immunodominant for BALB/c mice. Similarly, 88% (16/18) of anti-Der f I Mab bound to the same epitope on Der f I. Parallel cross-inhibition curves were obtained using the species-specific Mab, 10B9, and the cross-reacting Mab, 4C1, to compete for binding to Der p I, suggesting that the epitopes defined by these two Mab on Der p I are adjacent to one another. Both murine Mab and polyclonal rabbit IgG antibodies to cross-reacting sites on both allergens were used to inhibit binding of human IgE antibodies to Der p I by using 19 sera from mite allergic patients. Cross-reacting rabbit IgG antibodies strongly inhibited all sera tested (mean 79.5% +/- 7.7) and two Mab, 10B9 and 4C1, partially inhibited (38% +/- 12). However, the four Mab directed against separate species-specific epitopes (including murine immunodominant sites) showed little or no inhibition (less than or equal to 20%). Our results suggest that most of the epitopes defined by Mab are not the same as, or close to, those defined by human IgE antibody. The striking differences in the repertoires of murine IgG and human IgE antibody responses to Der p I and Der f I could be explained by genetic differences or by altered antigen processing and presentation occurring as a result of different modes of immunization in mice and in mite allergic humans.