Literature DB >> 24421732

Perceptions of five-year competitive categories: model of how relative age influences competitiveness in masters sport.

Nikola Medic1, Bradley W Young2, J Robert Grove3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the contrasting perceptions of masters swimmers related to the first and fifth constituent years of a 5-year age category. Swimmers aged between 35 and 93 years (154 male, 184 female) were surveyed at the 2008 FINA World Masters Championships. Exploratory factor analysis indicated the existence of the following five factors considered important for preparation, attendance, and success at masters competitions: awareness of advantages, expectancy, motivation, training, and physiological capacity. One sample t-tests showed that masters swimmers are conscious of advantages that 5-year age categories afford to relatively-younger cohorts (i.e., those who are in the first year of any age category). They also perceive that, in the first compared to the fifth year of an age category, they have greater physiological capacity, engage in more training, have higher expectations to perform well, and are more motivated (all ps < .001). Findings point to perceived psycho-social and physical factors that potentially explain why relatively younger masters athletes are more likely to perform better and to participate in masters competitions than relatively older masters athletes. Key PointsThere are at least five psycho-social and physical factors (i.e., awareness of advantages, expectancy, motivation, training, and physiological capacity) that may explain why relatively younger masters athletes are more likely to perform better and to participate more in masters competitions than relatively older masters athletes.Masters athletes are conscious of the advantage that 5-year age categories afford to relatively younger cohorts of athletes.Differential perceptions associated with the 5-year age categories might compromise masters athletes' continuity of sport competitiveness and underlying training.

Keywords:  Sport participation; aging; competition; motivation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24421732      PMCID: PMC3873663     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  14 in total

1.  Career-span analyses of track performance: longitudinal data present a more optimistic view of age-related performance decline.

Authors:  Bradley W Young; Janet L Starkes
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe.

Authors:  Werner F Helsen; Jan van Winckel; A Mark Williams
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Towards a unified understanding of relative age effects.

Authors:  Nick Wattie; Stephen Cobley; Joseph Baker
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Relative age effect in masters sports: replication and extension.

Authors:  Nikola Medic; Janet L Starkes; Patricia L Weir; Bradley W Young; J Robert Grove
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Gender, age, and sport differences in relative age effects among US Masters swimming and track and field athletes.

Authors:  Nikola Medic; Bradley W Young; Janet L Starkes; Patricia L Weir; J Robert Grove
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Examining relative age effects on performance achievement and participation rates in Masters athletes.

Authors:  Nikola Medic; Janet L Starkes; Bradley W Young
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 7.  Masters athletes: factors affecting performance.

Authors:  L G Maharam; P A Bauman; D Kalman; H Skolnik; S M Perle
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Aging performance for masters records in athletics, swimming, rowing, cycling, triathlon, and weightlifting.

Authors:  A Barry Baker; Yong Q Tang
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Declines in physiological functional capacity with age: a longitudinal study in peak swimming performance.

Authors:  Anthony J Donato; Kathleen Tench; Deborah H Glueck; Douglas R Seals; Iratxe Eskurza; Hirofumi Tanaka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-10-18

10.  From Oxford to Hawaii ecophysiological barriers limit human progression in ten sport monuments.

Authors:  François-Denis Desgorces; Geoffroy Berthelot; Nour El Helou; Valérie Thibault; Marion Guillaume; Muriel Tafflet; Olivier Hermine; Jean-François Toussaint
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Relative Age Affects Marathon Performance in Male and Female Athletes.

Authors:  Mark J Connick; Emma M Beckman; Sean M Tweedy
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Constituent Year Effect in Masters Sports: An Empirical View on the Historical Development in US Masters Swimming.

Authors:  Nikola Medic; Manuel Müssener; Babett H Lobinger; Bradley W Young
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Declines in marathon performance: Sex differences in elite and recreational athletes.

Authors:  Gerald S Zavorsky; Kelly A Tomko; James M Smoliga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Geographical Variations in the Interaction of Relative Age Effects in Youth and Adult Elite Soccer.

Authors:  Christina Steingröver; Nick Wattie; Joseph Baker; Werner F Helsen; Jörg Schorer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-07

5.  Physical Activity and Aging: Exploring Motivations of Masters Swimmers.

Authors:  Susan L Brilliant; Maria Claver; Patti LaPlace; Cynthia Schlesinger
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.