Literature DB >> 24421221

Current temporal trends in moth abundance are counter to predicted effects of climate change in an assemblage of subarctic forest moths.

Mark D Hunter1, Mikhail V Kozlov, Juhani Itämies, Erkki Pulliainen, Jaana Bäck, Ella-Maria Kyrö, Pekka Niemelä.   

Abstract

Changes in climate are influencing the distribution and abundance of the world's biota, with significant consequences for biological diversity and ecosystem processes. Recent work has raised concern that populations of moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera) may be particularly susceptible to population declines under environmental change. Moreover, effects of climate change may be especially pronounced in high latitude ecosystems. Here, we examine population dynamics in an assemblage of subarctic forest moths in Finnish Lapland to assess current trajectories of population change. Moth counts were made continuously over a period of 32 years using light traps. From 456 species recorded, 80 were sufficiently abundant for detailed analyses of their population dynamics. Climate records indicated rapid increases in temperature and winter precipitation at our study site during the sampling period. However, 90% of moth populations were stable (57%) or increasing (33%) over the same period of study. Nonetheless, current population trends do not appear to reflect positive responses to climate change. Rather, time-series models illustrated that the per capita rates of change of moth species were more frequently associated negatively than positively with climate change variables, even as their populations were increasing. For example, the per capita rates of change of 35% of microlepidoptera were associated negatively with climate change variables. Moth life-history traits were not generally strong predictors of current population change or associations with climate change variables. However, 60% of moth species that fed as larvae on resources other than living vascular plants (e.g. litter, lichen, mosses) were associated negatively with climate change variables in time-series models, suggesting that such species may be particularly vulnerable to climate change. Overall, populations of subarctic forest moths in Finland are performing better than expected, and their populations appear buffered at present from potential deleterious effects of climate change by other ecological forces.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; climate change; forest insects; lepidoptera; life-history traits; moth declines; time-series analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24421221     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  Insects and recent climate change.

Authors:  Christopher A Halsch; Arthur M Shapiro; James A Fordyce; Chris C Nice; James H Thorne; David P Waetjen; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Role of weather and other factors in the dynamics of a low-density insect population.

Authors:  Christer Solbreck; Jonas Knape; Jonas Förare
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  The Technical and Performance Characteristics of a Low-Cost, Simply Constructed, Black Light Moth Trap.

Authors:  Peter J T White; Katharine Glover; Joel Stewart; Amanda Rice
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Parasitoids indicate major climate-induced shifts in arctic communities.

Authors:  Tuomas Kankaanpää; Eero Vesterinen; Bess Hardwick; Niels M Schmidt; Tommi Andersson; Paul E Aspholm; Isabel C Barrio; Niklas Beckers; Joël Bêty; Tone Birkemoe; Melissa DeSiervo; Katherine H I Drotos; Dorothee Ehrich; Olivier Gilg; Vladimir Gilg; Nils Hein; Toke T Høye; Kristian M Jakobsen; Camille Jodouin; Jesse Jorna; Mikhail V Kozlov; Jean-Claude Kresse; Don-Jean Leandri-Breton; Nicolas Lecomte; Maarten Loonen; Philipp Marr; Spencer K Monckton; Maia Olsen; Josée-Anne Otis; Michelle Pyle; Ruben E Roos; Katrine Raundrup; Daria Rozhkova; Brigitte Sabard; Aleksandr Sokolov; Natalia Sokolova; Anna M Solecki; Christine Urbanowicz; Catherine Villeneuve; Evgenya Vyguzova; Vitali Zverev; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 13.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.