PURPOSE: The most important index of renal function is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) which can be calculated from creatinine or cystatin C concentration in serum. There is uncertainty, which formula is best suited to assess renal function in morbidly obese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate eGFR in patients with morbid obesity using formulas: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Grubb, Le Bricon, Hoek, Larsson, and to compare the obtained results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 40 morbidly obese patients, serum concentration of cystatin C and creatinine were assayed. Values of eGFR were calculated using the above-mentioned formulas. RESULTS: The mean value of eGFR ranged from 85.9 to 111.1 ml/min/1.73 m², depending on the formula. The biggest difference between the obtained values was 29% (Grubb vs. Hoek p<0.01). After calculation of eGFR from creatinine concentration (MDRD), 7 patients were qualified to the 2nd and 3rd stage of chronic renal disease, while application of Hoek's formula, based on cystatin C concentration, allotted 27 patients to 2nd and 3rd stage of chronic renal disease. Le Bricon formula gave eGFR values, that correlated best with albuminuria. CONCLUSION: eGFR calculated using Le Bricon formula based on the cystatin C concentration was significantly lower than eGFR calculated from creatinine concentration and was more closely associated with albuminuria. Relying only on creatinine concentration to estimate glomerular filtration rate can lead to underestimation of renal malfunction in obese patients.
PURPOSE: The most important index of renal function is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) which can be calculated from creatinine or cystatin C concentration in serum. There is uncertainty, which formula is best suited to assess renal function in morbidly obesepatients. The aim of this study was to evaluate eGFR in patients with morbid obesity using formulas: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Grubb, Le Bricon, Hoek, Larsson, and to compare the obtained results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 40 morbidly obesepatients, serum concentration of cystatin C and creatinine were assayed. Values of eGFR were calculated using the above-mentioned formulas. RESULTS: The mean value of eGFR ranged from 85.9 to 111.1 ml/min/1.73 m², depending on the formula. The biggest difference between the obtained values was 29% (Grubb vs. Hoek p<0.01). After calculation of eGFR from creatinine concentration (MDRD), 7 patients were qualified to the 2nd and 3rd stage of chronic renal disease, while application of Hoek's formula, based on cystatin C concentration, allotted 27 patients to 2nd and 3rd stage of chronic renal disease. Le Bricon formula gave eGFR values, that correlated best with albuminuria. CONCLUSION: eGFR calculated using Le Bricon formula based on the cystatin C concentration was significantly lower than eGFR calculated from creatinine concentration and was more closely associated with albuminuria. Relying only on creatinine concentration to estimate glomerular filtration rate can lead to underestimation of renal malfunction in obesepatients.
Authors: Ahmed Alaini; Deepak Malhotra; Helbert Rondon-Berrios; Christos P Argyropoulos; Zeid J Khitan; Dominic S C Raj; Mark Rohrscheib; Joseph I Shapiro; Antonios H Tzamaloukas Journal: World J Methodol Date: 2017-09-26