Literature DB >> 24420973

Confidence intervals for ranks of age-adjusted rates across states or counties.

Shunpu Zhang1, Jun Luo, Li Zhu, David G Stinchcomb, Dave Campbell, Ginger Carter, Scott Gilkeson, Eric J Feuer.   

Abstract

Health indices provide information to the general public on the health condition of the community. They can also be used to inform the government's policy making, to evaluate the effect of a current policy or healthcare program, or for program planning and priority setting. It is a common practice that the health indices across different geographic units are ranked and the ranks are reported as fixed values. We argue that the ranks should be viewed as random and hence should be accompanied by an indication of precision (i.e., the confidence intervals). A technical difficulty in doing so is how to account for the dependence among the ranks in the construction of confidence intervals. In this paper, we propose a novel Monte Carlo method for constructing the individual and simultaneous confidence intervals of ranks for age-adjusted rates. The proposed method uses as input age-specific counts (of cases of disease or deaths) and their associated populations. We have further extended it to the case in which only the age-adjusted rates and confidence intervals are available. Finally, we demonstrate the proposed method to analyze US age-adjusted cancer incidence rates and mortality rates for cancer and other diseases by states and counties within a state using a website that will be publicly available. The results show that for rare or relatively rare disease (especially at the county level), ranks are essentially meaningless because of their large variability, while for more common disease in larger geographic units, ranks can be effectively utilized.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age-adjusted rate; rank; simultaneous confidence interval

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24420973     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  County Health Rankings and the Cult of the Imperfect.

Authors:  Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Just How Useful Are Health Rankings?

Authors:  Stephan Arndt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Ranking States on Coverage of Cancer-Preventing Vaccines Among Adolescents: The Influence of Imprecision.

Authors:  Anne R Waldrop; Jennifer L Moss; Benmei Liu; Li Zhu
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Ranking composite Cancer Burden Indices for geographic regions: point and interval estimates.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Elizabeth Pollock; Li Zhu; Jessica P Athens; Ron Gangnon; Eric J Feuer; Thomas C Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Comparing percentages and ranks of adolescent weight-related outcomes among U.S. states: Implications for intervention development.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Benmei Liu; Li Zhu
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  The number of key carcinogenic events can be predicted from cancer incidence.

Authors:  Aleksey V Belikov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  State Prevalence and Ranks of Adolescent Substance Use: Implications for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Benmei Liu; Li Zhu
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.830

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.