BACKGROUND: Despite intensive research, neurological morbidity from delayed cerebral ischemia remains common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In the current study, we evaluate the neuroprotective effects of a pH-dependent GluN2B subunit-selective NMDA receptor antagonist in a murine model of SAH. METHODS: Following induction of SAH, 12 ± 2 week old male C57-BL/6 mice received NP10075, a pH-dependent NMDA receptor antagonist, or vehicle. In a separate series of experiments, NP10075 and the non-pH sensitive NMDA antagonist, NP10191, were administered to normoglycemic and hyperglycemic mice. Both histological (right middle cerebral artery diameter, NeuN, and Fluoro-Jade B staining) and functional endpoints (rotarod latency and neuroseverity score) were evaluated to assess the therapeutic benefit of NP10075. RESULTS: Administration of NP10075 was well tolerated and had minimal hemodynamic effects following SAH. Administration of the pH-sensitive NMDA antagonist NP10075, but not NP10191, was associated with a durable improvement in the functional performance of both normoglycemic and hyperglycemic animals. NP10075 was also associated with a reduction in vasospasm in the middle cerebral artery associated with hemorrhage. There was no significant difference between treatment with nimodipine + NP10075, as compared to NP10075 alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that use of a pH-dependent NMDA antagonist has the potential to work selectively in areas of ischemia known to undergo acidic pH shifts, and thus may be associated with selective regional efficacy and fewer behavioral side effects than non-selective NMDA antagonists.
BACKGROUND: Despite intensive research, neurological morbidity from delayed cerebral ischemia remains common after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In the current study, we evaluate the neuroprotective effects of a pH-dependent GluN2B subunit-selective NMDA receptor antagonist in a murine model of SAH. METHODS: Following induction of SAH, 12 ± 2 week old male C57-BL/6 mice received NP10075, a pH-dependent NMDA receptor antagonist, or vehicle. In a separate series of experiments, NP10075 and the non-pH sensitive NMDA antagonist, NP10191, were administered to normoglycemic and hyperglycemic mice. Both histological (right middle cerebral artery diameter, NeuN, and Fluoro-Jade B staining) and functional endpoints (rotarod latency and neuroseverity score) were evaluated to assess the therapeutic benefit of NP10075. RESULTS: Administration of NP10075 was well tolerated and had minimal hemodynamic effects following SAH. Administration of the pH-sensitive NMDA antagonist NP10075, but not NP10191, was associated with a durable improvement in the functional performance of both normoglycemic and hyperglycemic animals. NP10075 was also associated with a reduction in vasospasm in the middle cerebral artery associated with hemorrhage. There was no significant difference between treatment with nimodipine + NP10075, as compared to NP10075 alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that use of a pH-dependent NMDA antagonist has the potential to work selectively in areas of ischemia known to undergo acidic pH shifts, and thus may be associated with selective regional efficacy and fewer behavioral side effects than non-selective NMDA antagonists.
Authors: Jose Javier Provencio; Valerie Swank; Haiyan Lu; Sylvain Brunet; Selva Baltan; Rohini V Khapre; Himabindu Seerapu; Olga N Kokiko-Cochran; Bruce T Lamb; Richard M Ransohoff Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Hongjie Yuan; Scott J Myers; Gordon Wells; Katherine L Nicholson; Sharon A Swanger; Polina Lyuboslavsky; Yesim A Tahirovic; David S Menaldino; Thota Ganesh; Lawrence J Wilson; Dennis C Liotta; James P Snyder; Stephen F Traynelis Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Marcel A Kamp; Jasper H van Lieshout; Maxine Dibué-Adjei; Jasmin K Weber; Toni Schneider; Tanja Restin; Igor Fischer; Hans-Jakob Steiger Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Andrea Schampel; Oleg Volovitch; Tobias Koeniger; Claus-Jürgen Scholz; Stefanie Jörg; Ralf A Linker; Erhard Wischmeyer; Marie Wunsch; Johannes W Hell; Süleyman Ergün; Stefanie Kuerten Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott J Myers; Kamalesh P Ruppa; Lawrence J Wilson; Yesim A Tahirovic; Polina Lyuboslavsky; David S Menaldino; Zackery W Dentmon; George W Koszalka; Robert Zaczek; Raymond J Dingledine; Stephen F Traynelis; Dennis C Liotta Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Kasper B Hansen; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Derek Bowie; Hiro Furukawa; Frank S Menniti; Alexander I Sobolevsky; Geoffrey T Swanson; Sharon A Swanger; Ingo H Greger; Terunaga Nakagawa; Chris J McBain; Vasanthi Jayaraman; Chian-Ming Low; Mark L Dell'Acqua; Jeffrey S Diamond; Chad R Camp; Riley E Perszyk; Hongjie Yuan; Stephen F Traynelis Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 18.923