Literature DB >> 24420339

Where do pulse oximeter probes break?

S Crede1, G Van der Merwe, J Hutchinson, D Woods, W Karlen, J Lawn.   

Abstract

Pulse oximetry, a non-invasive method for accurate assessment of blood oxygen saturation (SPO2), is an important monitoring tool in health care facilities. However, it is often not available in many low-resource settings, due to expense, overly sophisticated design, a lack of organised procurement systems and inadequate medical device management and maintenance structures. Furthermore medical devices are often fragile and not designed to withstand the conditions of low-resource settings. In order to design a probe, better suited to the needs of health care facilities in low-resource settings this study aimed to document the site and nature of pulse oximeter probe breakages in a range of different probe designs in a low to middle income country. A retrospective review of job cards relating to the assessment and repair of damaged or faulty pulse oximeter probes was conducted at a medical device repair company based in Cape Town, South Africa, specializing in pulse oximeter probe repairs. 1,840 job cards relating to the assessment and repair of pulse oximeter probes were reviewed. 60.2 % of probes sent for assessment were finger-clip probes. For all probes, excluding the neonatal wrap probes, the most common point of failure was the probe wiring (>50 %). The neonatal wrap most commonly failed at the strap (51.5 %). The total cost for quoting on the broken pulse oximeter probes and for the subsequent repair of devices, excluding replacement components, amounted to an estimated ZAR 738,810 (USD $98,508). Improving the probe wiring would increase the life span of pulse oximeter probes. Increasing the life span of probes will make pulse oximetry more affordable and accessible. This is of high priority in low-resource settings where frequent repair or replacement of probes is unaffordable or impossible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24420339     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9538-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  5 in total

1.  Perspectives in quality: designing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist.

Authors:  Thomas G Weiser; Alex B Haynes; Angela Lashoher; Gerald Dziekan; Daniel J Boorman; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: an estimation from reported data.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Thomas G Weiser; William R Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Alan F Merry; Angela C Enright; Iain H Wilson; Gerald Dziekan; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Clinical signs of hypoxaemia in children with acute lower respiratory infection: indicators of oxygen therapy.

Authors:  S Usen; M Webert
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Pulse oximetry: theory and applications for noninvasive monitoring.

Authors:  Y Mendelson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Pulse oximetry: technology to reduce child mortality in developing countries.

Authors:  T Duke; R Subhi; D Peel; B Frey
Journal:  Ann Trop Paediatr       Date:  2009-09
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Variability in the use of pulse oximeters with children in Kenyan hospitals: A mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Abigail J Enoch; Mike English; Gerald McGivern; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.069

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.