Literature DB >> 24419513

Optimization of health-care organization and perceived improvement of patient comfort by switching from intra-venous BU four-times-daily infusions to a once-daily administration scheme in adult hematopoietic stem cell recipients.

A Xhaard1, P Rzepecki2, D Valcarcel3, S Santarone4, S Fürst5, D Serrano6, G De Angelis7, W Krüger8, C Scheid9.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown an equivalent pharmacokinetic profile between four-times-daily (4QD) and once-daily (QD) administration of intra-venous (IV) BU, without increased toxicity. We assess the impact of a switch in IV BU from a 4QD to a QD schedule, in terms of health-care organization, staff working conditions, quality of care dispensed and perceived patient comfort. Clinicians, nurses and pharmacists from nine allogeneic transplantation units in five European countries were interviewed face to face. Overall perception of QD versus 4QD BU was very positive. Both administration schemes were evaluated to be equally efficaciousZ. QD BU was perceived to be safer and more convenient. Clinicians and nurses perceived that patient comfort was improved, due to fewer complications associated with repeated infusions, and avoiding night infusions associated with stress, anxiety and decreased quality of sleep. Switching from 4QD to QD BU had a significant impact on health-care organization, with a better integration in the overall management and usual timelines in the pharmacies and transplantation units. Time spent to prepare and administer BU was significantly reduced, leading to potential financial savings that merit further assessment and would be of particular interest in the current economic climate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24419513     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  13 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of once-daily IV busulfan as part of pretransplantation preparative regimens: a comparison with an every 6-hour dosing schedule.

Authors:  Timothy Madden; Marcos de Lima; Neil Thapar; John Nguyen; Soonja Roberson; Daniel Couriel; Betty Pierre; Elizabeth J Shpall; Roy B Jones; Richard E Champlin; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes.

Authors:  J A Russell; H T Tran; D Quinlan; A Chaudhry; P Duggan; C Brown; D Stewart; J D Ruether; D Morris; S Glick; E Gyonyor; B S Andersson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Intravenous versus oral busulfan as part of a busulfan/cyclophosphamide preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: decreased incidence of hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD), HVOD-related mortality, and overall 100-day mortality.

Authors:  Ashwin Kashyap; John Wingard; Pablo Cagnoni; Jones Roy; Stephan Tarantolo; Wendy Hu; Karl Blume; Joyce Niland; Joycelynne M Palmer; William Vaughan; Hugo Fernandez; Richard Champlin; Stephen Forman; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Intravenous compared with oral busulfan as preparation for allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for AML and MDS.

Authors:  R M Sobecks; L Rybicki; M Yurch; M Kalaycio; R Dean; S Andresen; B Pohlman; H Duong; B Bolwell; E Copelan
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  The EBMT activity survey: 1990-2010.

Authors:  J R Passweg; H Baldomero; A Gratwohl; M Bregni; S Cesaro; P Dreger; T de Witte; D Farge-Bancel; B Gaspar; J Marsh; M Mohty; C Peters; A Tichelli; A Velardi; C Ruiz de Elvira; F Falkenburg; A Sureda; A Madrigal
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Pharmacokinetics of busulfan: correlation with veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  L B Grochow; R J Jones; R B Brundrett; H G Braine; T L Chen; R Saral; G W Santos; O M Colvin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning is potentially feasible as an outpatient procedure.

Authors:  M Subirà; A Sureda; I Ancín; R Martino; A Altés; S Brunet; J Sierra
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Outpatient myeloablative allo-SCT: a comprehensive approach yields decreased hospital utilization and low TRM.

Authors:  S R Solomon; R H Matthews; A M Barreras; A Bashey; K L Manion; K McNatt; D Speckhart; D G Connaghan; L E Morris; H K Holland
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Superior survival after replacing oral with intravenous busulfan in autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma with busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide.

Authors:  Robert M Dean; Brad Pohlman; John W Sweetenham; Ronald M Sobecks; Matt E Kalaycio; Stephen D Smith; Edward A Copelan; Steven Andresen; Lisa A Rybicki; Julie Curtis; Brian J Bolwell
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Outcomes following HSCT using fludarabine, busulfan, and thymoglobulin: a matched comparison to allogeneic transplants conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Christopher N Bredeson; Mei-Jie Zhang; Manza-A Agovi; Andrea Bacigalupo; Nizar J Bahlis; Karen Ballen; Christopher Brown; M Ahsan Chaudhry; Mary M Horowitz; Seira Kurian; Diana Quinlan; Catherine E Muehlenbien; James A Russell; Lynn Savoie; J Douglas Rizzo; Douglas A Stewart
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Authors:  Khalil Ben Hassine; Madeleine Powys; Peter Svec; Miroslava Pozdechova; Birgitta Versluys; Marc Ansari; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.