Literature DB >> 24418730

Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) analysis of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.

James K Kirklin1, David C Naftel2, Robert L Kormos3, Francis D Pagani4, Susan L Myers2, Lynne W Stevenson5, Michael A Acker6, Daniel L Goldstein7, Scott C Silvestry8, Carmelo A Milano9, J T Baldwin10, J Timothy Baldwin10, Sean Pinney11, J Eduardo Rame6, Marissa A Miller10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pump thrombosis remains an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). A perceived increase in the incidence of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) by clinicians prompted this analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database.
METHODS: Between 2006 and June 2013, 8,988 United States patients aged older than 18 years received a durable LVAD. Of these, 6,910 adult patients from 132 institutions who received a HMII LVAD were entered in the INTERMACS database and constitute the study group for this analysis.
RESULTS: Overall survival (with censoring at transplant or explant for recovery) with the HMII LVAD was 80% at 1 year and 69% at 2 years and was not significantly different when stratified by era of implant. Freedom from device exchange or death due to thrombosis decreased from 99% at 6 months in 2009 to 94% in 2012 (p < 0.0001). Multivariable hazard function analysis showed risk factors for pump thrombosis included later implant year (p < 0.0001), younger age (p < 0.0001), higher creatinine (p = 0.002), larger body mass index (p = 0.004), white race (p = 0.0004), left ventricular ejection fraction above 20% (p = 0.02), and higher lactate dehydrogenase level at 1 month (p < 0.0001). Survival (p < 0.0001) and freedom from infection (p = 0.008) and cerebrovascular accident (p < 0.0001) were lower after pump exchange than after primary implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Pump exchange or death due to pump thrombosis increased during 2011 and 2012, but the magnitude of the increase remained relatively small. Survival remains high (80% at 1 year) with the HMII LVAD. Risk factor analysis suggests that a number of patient-related factors contribute to the risk of thrombosis. Markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase in the first month is a predictor of pump thrombosis. This analysis could not examine the potential role of technical factors during implant, such as sub-optimal pump or graft positioning, changes in patient management paradigms with pump speed settings, improved recognition and change in the threshold for pump exchange, or design or production changes with the pump, as contributors to the risk of pump thrombosis.
© 2013 Published by International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation on behalf of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HeartMate II; INTERMACS; LVAD; heart failure; pump thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24418730     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  75 in total

1.  Preliminary report on the cost effectiveness of ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takura; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryuji Tominaga; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshihisa Tanoue; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Imaging in patients after cardiac transplantation and in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Bhanu Gupta; Dany Jacob; Randall Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Clinical outcomes with use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Michael E Nassif; Jayendrakumar S Patel; Jerrica E Shuster; David S Raymer; Ronald Jackups; Eric Novak; Brian F Gage; Sunil Prasad; Scott C Silvestry; Gregory A Ewald; Shane J LaRue
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 12.035

5.  Impact of Obesity on Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes.

Authors:  Abhishek Jaiswal; Lauren K Truby; Astha Chichra; Rashmi Jain; Leann Myers; Nirav Patel; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Michael V Gavalas; Pauline N Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; A Reshad Garan; Allison P Levin; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Justin Fried; Yoshifumi Naka; Veli K Topkara; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  Pump thrombosis-A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

Authors:  Arie Blitz
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

8.  Left ventricular assist devices exchange: why, when and how to do it-experience from experts.

Authors:  Bastian Schmack; Anton Sabashnikov; Alexander Weymann; Mohamed Zeriouh; Achim Koch; Arjang Ruhparwar; Andre Ruediger Simon; Aron Frederik Popov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  The evolution of left ventricular assist devices-a moment to reflect.

Authors:  Michael Kuehl; Jens Garbade
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Continuously Updated Estimation of Heart Transplant Waitlist Mortality.

Authors:  Eugene H Blackstone; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Vincent B Cruz; Eileen M Hsich; Marijan Koprivanac; Nicholas G Smedira; Katherine J Hoercher; Lucy Thuita; Randall C Starling
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.