Literature DB >> 24418668

Surgical Care Improvement Project measure for postoperative glucose control should not be used as a measure of quality after cardiac surgery.

Damien J LaPar1, James M Isbell1, John A Kern1, Gorav Ailawadi1, Irving L Kron2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The current Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) measure for controlled postoperative 6-am glycemic control after cardiac surgery identifies those with blood glucose levels of ≤200 mg/dL. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of achieving this SCIP measure on risk-adjusted postoperative cardiac surgical outcomes.
METHODS: The data were analyzed for all cardiac surgery patients from a single institution (June 2010 to August 2012). The patients were categorized by the postoperative 6-am glucose levels into 2 SCIP measure cohorts: SCIP (≤200 mg/dL) versus non-SCIP (>200 mg/dL). Propensity-matched cohort comparisons and multiple regression analyses assessed the associations between SCIP measure compliance and the risk-adjusted outcomes.
RESULTS: Of 1703 patients, 1527 (90%) achieved SCIP measure glycemic control. Preoperative diabetes was more common among the non-SCIP patients (P < .001); the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons-predicted mortality (P = .14) was similar between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed in major morbidity, mortality, or resource usage among the propensity-matched cohorts. After adjustment for Society of Thoracic Surgeons-predicted risk, non-SCIP status was not associated with increased mortality (P = .44), composite major morbidity (P = .16), major sternal complications (P = .68), total intensive care unit duration (P = .70), or postoperative length of stay (P = .27). Similar risk-adjusted results were estimated for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
CONCLUSIONS: Achieving the SCIP measure for controlled postoperative 6-am blood glucose levels ≤200 mg/dL after cardiac surgery was not associated with improved risk-adjusted mortality, morbidity, or hospital resource usage. These data suggest that this metric might not be a valid measure of postoperative cardiac surgical quality.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24418668     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Surgical site infection: comparing surgeon versus patient self-report.

Authors:  Julius Cuong Pham; Melinda J Ashton; Chieko Kimata; Della M Lin; Beau K Nakamoto
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Learning from mistakes in clinical practice guidelines: the case of perioperative β-blockade.

Authors:  Mark D Neuman; Charles L Bosk; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  What can the national quality forum tell us about performance measurement in anesthesiology?

Authors:  Joseph A Hyder; Jonathan Niconchuk; Laurent G Glance; Mark D Neuman; Robert R Cima; Richard P Dutton; Louis L Nguyen; Lee A Fleisher; Angela M Bader
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Bolus versus continuous insulin infusion in immediate postoperative blood glucose control in liver transplantation: pragmatic clinical trial.

Authors:  Luciana Vládia Carvalhêdo Fragoso; Márcio Flávio Moura de Araújo; Lidianne Fernandes da Silva Lobo; Dirk Schreen; Maria Lúcia Zanetti; Marta Maria Coelho Damasceno
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.