Literature DB >> 24418571

Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: a mixed methods approach.

Carter Bloch1, Mads P Sørensen2, Ebbe K Graversen2, Jesper W Schneider2, Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt2, Kaare Aagaard2, Niels Mejlgaard2.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the development of a mixed methods approach to analyse research funding. Research policy has taken on an increasingly prominent role in the broader political scene, where research is seen as a critical factor in maintaining and improving growth, welfare and international competitiveness. This has motivated growing emphasis on the impacts of science funding, and how funding can best be designed to promote socio-economic progress. Meeting these demands for impact assessment involves a number of complex issues that are difficult to fully address in a single study or in the design of a single methodology. However, they point to some general principles that can be explored in methodological design. We draw on a recent evaluation of the impacts of research grant funding, discussing both key issues in developing a methodology for the analysis and subsequent results. The case of research grant funding, involving a complex mix of direct and intermediate effects that contribute to the overall impact of funding on research performance, illustrates the value of a mixed methods approach to provide a more robust and complete analysis of policy impacts. Reflections on the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology are used to examine refinements for future work.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Additionality; Grants; Impact analysis; Mixed methods; Research policy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24418571     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  3 in total

1.  Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Salla Atkins; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Using a mHealth system to recall and refer existing clients and refer community members with health concerns to primary healthcare facilities in South Africa: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Willem Odendaal; Simon Lewin; Brian McKinstry; Mark Tomlinson; Esme Jordaan; Mikateko Mazinu; Pam Haig; Anna Thorson; Salla Atkins
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Mixed-methods library evaluation integrating the patron, library, and external perspectives: The case of Namibia regional libraries.

Authors:  Moonjung Yim; Michelle Fellows; Chris Coward
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2020-01-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.