Literature DB >> 24418275

Reduced stocking density mitigates the negative effects of regrouping in dairy cattle.

A Talebi1, M A G von Keyserlingk1, E Telezhenko1, D M Weary2.   

Abstract

In freestall systems, cows are frequently moved among pens and regrouped. This practice involves mixing unfamiliar cows, and can result in changes in stocking density after regrouping. Both regrouping and changes in stocking density can affect cow welfare, but no study to date has assessed the combined effects. The aim of this study was to test if reductions in stocking density can mitigate the responses to regrouping. By manipulating group size (6 vs. 12 cows) and pen size (12 vs. 24 stalls), 3 different stocking densities were created (25, 50, and 100%). Four groups of Holstein cows were regrouped weekly for 4 wk and the stocking density changed at regrouping. The change in density varied as follows: a decrease by a factor of 4 (100 to 25%), a decrease by a factor of 2 (100 to 50% or 50 to 25%), no change (50 to 50%), an increase by a factor of 2 (25 to 50% or 50 to 100%), and an increase by a factor of 4 (25 to 100%). Displacements at the feeding area, feeding time, and lying time were scored. The daily means for each group were used to calculate the differences in responses from 1d before to 1d after each regrouping. The number of displacements at the feed bunk decreased and lying time increased when stocking density decreased at regrouping. In conclusion, increases in competitive behavior and the associated decrease in lying times can be mitigated by reducing stocking density when regrouping dairy cows.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cow; feeding behavior; group size; housing; pen size

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24418275     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-6921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  About the inconvenience of handling mixed-breed herds; aspects of social behavior as a potential source of stress and economic losses.

Authors:  Antonio J Landaeta-Hernández; Rodolfo Ungerfeld; Ronald Randles; Ramon Littell; D Owen Rae; Peter J Chenoweth
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Automated bioacoustics: methods in ecology and conservation and their potential for animal welfare monitoring.

Authors:  Michael P Mcloughlin; Rebecca Stewart; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Free-Stall Use and Preferences in Dairy Cows: A Case Study on Neck Rails Covered by Foam.

Authors:  Marek Gaworski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Impact of a Dietary Citrus Extract on the Behavior and Production of Lactating Dairy Cows Following Regrouping: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Felipe H Padua; Kaitlyn M Dancy; Renée Bergeron; Trevor J DeVries
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 5.  Historical Evolution of Cattle Management and Herd Health of Dairy Farms in OECD Countries.

Authors:  Ivo Medeiros; Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Susana Astiz; João Simões
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.