Literature DB >> 24418269

Pathogen-specific effects on milk yield in repeated clinical mastitis episodes in Holstein dairy cows.

J A Hertl1, Y H Schukken2, F L Welcome3, L W Tauer4, Y T Gröhn2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the effects of clinical mastitis (CM) cases due to different pathogens on milk yield in Holstein cows. The first 3 CM cases in a cow's lactation were modeled. Eight categories of pathogens were included: Streptococcus spp.; Staphylococcus aureus; coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS); Escherichia coli; Klebsiella spp.; cases with CM signs but no bacterial growth (above the level detectable by our microbiological procedures) observed in the culture sample, and cases with contamination (≥ 3 pathogens in the sample); other pathogens that may be treated with antibiotics (included Citrobacter, Corynebacterium bovis, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Pasteurella, Pseudomonas; "other treatable"); and other pathogens not successfully treated with antibiotics (Trueperella pyogenes, Mycoplasma, Prototheca, yeasts; "other not treatable"). Data from 38,276 lactations in cows from 5 New York State dairy herds, collected from 2003-2004 until 2011, were analyzed. Mixed models with an autoregressive correlation structure (to account for correlation among the repeated measures of milk yield within a lactation) were estimated. Primiparous (lactation 1) and multiparous (lactations 2 and 3) cows were analyzed separately, as the shapes of their lactation curves differed. Primiparas were followed for up to 48 wk of lactation and multiparas for up to 44 wk. Fixed effects included parity, calving season, week of lactation, CM (type, case number, and timing of CM in relation to milk production cycle), and other diseases (milk fever, retained placenta, metritis, ketosis, displaced abomasum). Herd was modeled as a random effect. Clinical mastitis was more common in multiparas than in primiparas. In primiparas, Streptococcus spp. occurred most frequently as the first case. In multiparas, E. coli was most common as the first case. In subsequent cases, CM cases with no specific growth or contamination were most common in both parity groups. The hazard of CM increased with case number. Mastitic cows were generally higher producers before the CM episode than their nonmastitic herdmates. Milk loss varied with pathogen and case number. In primiparas, the greatest losses were associated with E. coli and "other not treatable" organisms. In multiparas, the greatest losses were associated with Klebsiella spp. and "other not treatable" organisms. Milk loss was not associated with occurrence of CNS. The findings may help farmers to make optimal management decisions for their cows.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mastitis; milk yield; mixed model; pathogen

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24418269     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  15 in total

1.  Immunosuppression in Cows following Intramammary Infusion of Mycoplasma bovis.

Authors:  Satoshi Gondaira; Koji Nishi; Takahiro Tanaka; Takashi Yamamoto; Takanori Nebu; Reina Watanabe; Satoru Konnai; Tomohito Hayashi; Yoshio Kiku; Mariko Okamoto; Kazuya Matsuda; Masateru Koiwa; Hidetomo Iwano; Hajime Nagahata; Hidetoshi Higuchi
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Episodes of clinical mastitis and its relationship with duration of treatment and seasonality in crossbred cows maintained in organized dairy farm.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; A Kumaresan; L Sreela; Tapas Kumar Patbandha; Shiwani Tiwari; Subhash Chandra
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-01-21

3.  Evaluation of an On-Farm Culture System (Accumast) for Fast Identification of Milk Pathogens Associated with Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Erika Korzune Ganda; Rafael Sisconeto Bisinotto; Dean Harrison Decter; Rodrigo Carvalho Bicalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors associated with marketable milk production recovery after treatment of naturally occurring acute coliform mastitis.

Authors:  Yasunori Shinozuka; Sohei Kaneko; Tomoyasu Kurose; Aiko Watanabe; Kana Kuruhara; Kazuhiro Kawai
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  A strategy to estimate the rate of recruitment of inflammatory cells during bovine intramammary infection under field management.

Authors:  J Detilleux
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Herd-Level Mastitis-Associated Costs on Canadian Dairy Farms.

Authors:  Mahjoob Aghamohammadi; Denis Haine; David F Kelton; Herman W Barkema; Henk Hogeveen; Gregory P Keefe; Simon Dufour
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-05-14

7.  Three Novel Players: PTK2B, SYK, and TNFRSF21 Were Identified to Be Involved in the Regulation of Bovine Mastitis Susceptibility via GWAS and Post-transcriptional Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Fanghui Chen; Lili Li; Li Yan; Tarig Badri; Chenglong Lv; Daolun Yu; Manling Zhang; Xiaojun Jang; Jie Li; Lu Yuan; Genlin Wang; Honglin Li; Jun Li; Yafei Cai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  The Animal-foods-environment interface of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Germany: an observational study on pathogenicity, resistance development and the current situation.

Authors:  Gamal Wareth; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 9.  Epidemiology and Classification of Mastitis.

Authors:  Maros Cobirka; Vladimir Tancin; Petr Slama
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Comparative Analysis of Milk Microbiomes and Their Association with Bovine Mastitis in Two Farms in Central Russia.

Authors:  Sergei Sokolov; Ksenia Fursova; Irina Shulcheva; Daria Nikanova; Olga Artyemieva; Evgenia Kolodina; Anatoly Sorokin; Timur Dzhelyadin; Margarita Shchannikova; Anna Shepelyakovskaya; Natalia Zinovieva; Fedor Brovko
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.