Literature DB >> 24418147

Enhanced selectivity of hydrogel-based molecularly imprinted polymers (HydroMIPs) following buffer conditioning.

Hazim F El-Sharif1, Quan T Phan1, Subrayal M Reddy2.   

Abstract

We have investigated the effect of buffer solution composition and pH during the preparation, washing and re-loading phases within a family of acrylamide-based molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for bovine haemoglobin (BHb), equine myoglobin (EMb) and bovine catalyse (BCat). We investigated water, phosphate buffer saline (PBS), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer and succinate buffer. Throughout the study MIP selectivity was highest for acrylamide, followed by N-hydroxymethylacrylamide, and then N-iso-propylacrylamide MIPs. The selectivity of the MIPs when compared with the NIPs decreased depending on the buffer conditions and pH in the order of Tris>PBS>succinate. The Tris buffer provided optimum imprinting conditions at 50 mM and pH 7.4, and MIP selectivities for the imprinting of BHb in polyacrylamide increased from an initial 8:1 to a 128:1 ratio. It was noted that the buffer conditions for the re-loading stage was important for determining MIP selectivity and the buffer conditions for the preparation stage was found to be less critical. We demonstrated that once MIPs are conditioned using Tris or PBS buffers (pH7.4) protein reloading in water should be avoided as negative effects on the MIP's imprinting capability results in low selectivities of 0.8:1. Furthermore, acidifying the pH of the buffer solution below pH 5.9 also has a negative impact on MIP selectivity especially for proteins with high isoelectric points. These buffer conditioning effects have also been successfully demonstrated in terms of MIP efficiency in real biological samples, namely plasma and serum.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocompatibility; Biomimetic material; Molecular imprinting; Protein binding; Selectivity; pH

Year:  2013        PMID: 24418147     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.11.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  6 in total

1.  Generation of ribosome imprinted polymers for sensitive detection of translational responses.

Authors:  Helen A King; Hazim F El-Sharif; Ana M Matia-González; Valentina Iadevaia; Adeola Fowotade; Subrayal M Reddy; André P Gerber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Highly sensitive detection and quantification of the secreted bacterial benevolence factor RoxP using a capacitive biosensor: A possible early detection system for oxidative skin diseases.

Authors:  Gizem Ertürk; Martin Hedström; Bo Mattiasson; Tautgirdas Ruzgas; Rolf Lood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers as Synthetic Virus Neutralizing Antibody Mimics.

Authors:  Simon P Graham; Hazim F El-Sharif; Sabha Hussain; Rieke Fruengel; Rebecca K McLean; Philippa C Hawes; Mark V Sullivan; Subrayal M Reddy
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-05-24

4.  Contribution to the Understanding of the Interaction between a Polydopamine Molecular Imprint and a Protein Model: Ionic Strength and pH Effect Investigation.

Authors:  Amal Tlili; Ghada Attia; Sohayb Khaoulani; Zouhour Mazouz; Chouki Zerrouki; Nourdin Yaakoubi; Ali Othmane; Najla Fourati
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Evaluation of electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymers (E-MIPs) on disposable electrodes for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Authors:  H F El Sharif; S R Dennison; M Tully; S Crossley; W Mwangi; D Bailey; S P Graham; S M Reddy
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.911

6.  Ultrasensitive Detection of Biomarkers by Using a Molecular Imprinting Based Capacitive Biosensor.

Authors:  Gizem Ertürk; Rolf Lood
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.355

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.