Literature DB >> 24417912

Long-term results in multiple myeloma after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation according to response categories in the era of old drugs.

Massimo Martino1, Maurizio Postorino2, Giuseppe Alberto Gallo3, Giuseppe Messina3, Santo Neri4, Eugenio Piro5, Massimo Gentile6, Tiziana Moscato3, Renza Monteleone3, Roberta Fedele3, Carla Mazzone6, Giuseppe Console3, Giuseppa Penna7, Caterina Alati8, Iolanda Donatella Vincelli8, Giuseppe Irrera3, Caterina Musolino7, Francesca Ronco8, Stefano Molica5, Fortunato Morabito6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the long-term prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) and the quality of response to therapy in a cohort of 173 patients treated with high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous transplantation in the era of old drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 173 patients with de novo MM who received a transplant between 1994 and 2010 were analyzed. VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], dexamethasone) was used as front-line regimen before auto-HPCT. The conditioning was HDM 200 mg/m(2). Patients were evaluated for clinical response using the criteria from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, modified to include near complete remission (nCR) and very good partial remission (VGPR).
RESULTS: The response distribution after transplantation in our series was complete remission (CR) in 33 cases (19%), nearly complete remission (nCR) in 38 cases (22%), VGPR in 30 cases (17%), partial remission (PR) in 65 cases (38%), and stable disease (SD) in 7 cases (4%). Patients were followed for 48 ± 36 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for the CR group. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 122 months for CR, 55 months for nCR, 56 months for VGPR, 32 months for PR, and 22 months for SD. Significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the CR and nCR groups (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively), between the CR and VGPR groups (P = .002 and P = .001, respectively), and between the CR and PR groups (P = .000 and P = .001, respectively). Responses were clustered in 3 main categories, ie, CR, nCR + VGPR + PR, and SD. The respective 10-year PFS and OS values were 58% and 70% for CR, 15% and 18% for nCR + VGPR + PR, and 0% and 0% for SD.
CONCLUSION: The achievement of depth and prolonged response represents the most important prognostic factor. The relapse rate is low for patients in CR after 10 years of follow-up, possibly signifying a cure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous transplantation; High-dose melphalan; Long-term results; Multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24417912     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  7 in total

Review 1.  Controversies in multiple myeloma: to transplant or not?

Authors:  Isabel Ruth Preeshagul; Koen Van Besien; Tomer M Mark
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Curing myeloma at last: defining criteria and providing the evidence.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Alan Mitchell; Frits van Rhee; Joshua Epstein; Gareth J Morgan; John Crowley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in the Context of Multiple Myeloma Treatment.

Authors:  Taiga Nishihori; Jinming Song; Kenneth H Shain
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  Oncolytic measles virus therapy enhances tumor antigen-specific T-cell responses in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nandakumar Packiriswamy; Deepak Upreti; Yumei Zhou; Rehan Khan; Amber Miller; Rosa M Diaz; Cliona M Rooney; Angela Dispenzieri; Kah-Whye Peng; Stephen J Russell
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Long-Term Responders After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Aina Oliver-Caldes; Juan Carlos Soler-Perromat; Ester Lozano; David Moreno; Alex Bataller; Pablo Mozas; Marta Garrote; Xavier Setoain; Juan Ignacio Aróstegui; Jordi Yagüe; Natalia Tovar; Raquel Jiménez; Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato; M Teresa Cibeira; Laura Rosiñol; Joan Bladé; Manel Juan; Carlos Fernández de Larrea
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Soluble PD-L1: A biomarker to predict progression of autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shang-Yi Huang; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Chung-Wu Lin; Chi-Cheng Li; Ming Yao; Jih-Luh Tang; Hsin-An Hou; Woei Tsay; Sheng-Je Chou; Chieh-Lung Cheng; Hwei-Fang Tien
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 7.  Spotlight on Melphalan Flufenamide: An Up-and-Coming Therapy for the Treatment of Myeloma.

Authors:  Fortunato Morabito; Giovanni Tripepi; Enrica Antonia Martino; Ernesto Vigna; Francesco Mendicino; Lucio Morabito; Katia Todoerti; Hamdi Al-Janazreh; Graziella D'Arrigo; Filippo Antonio Canale; Giovanna Cutrona; Antonino Neri; Massimo Martino; Massimo Gentile
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.