Literature DB >> 24417814

Depression as a prognostic factor of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Ashley B McKillop1, Linda J Carroll2, Michele C Battié3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a commonly diagnosed lumbar condition associated with pain and disability. Psychological factors, including depression, also affect these and other health-related outcomes. Yet, the prognostic value of depression specifically in the context of LSS is unclear.
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature on depression as a prognostic factor of outcomes in patients with LSS. STUDY
DESIGN: Best-evidence synthesis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients receiving the diagnosis of LSS and surgery.
METHODS: A best-evidence synthesis was conducted, including articles published between 1980 and May 2012. Each article meeting inclusion criteria, including a longitudinal design, was critically appraised on its methodological quality by two authors independently, who then met to reach consensus. Only studies deemed scientifically admissible were included in the review.
RESULTS: Among the 20 articles that met the inclusion criteria, 13 were judged scientifically admissible. The evidence supports an association between preoperative depression and postoperative LSS-related symptom severity (a combination of pain, numbness, weakness and balance issues) and disability. The effect size for these associations was variable, ranging from no effect to a moderate effect. For example, an increase of 5 points on a 63-point depression scale doubled the odds of being below the median in LSS-related symptom severity at follow-up. Findings on the association between preoperative depression and postoperative pain alone and walking capacity were more variable.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings support that preoperative depression is likely a prognostic factor for postoperative LSS-related symptom severity and disability at various follow-up points. The prognostic value of depression on the outcomes of pain and walking capacity is less clear. Nonetheless, depression should be considered in the clinical care of this population.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best evidence synthesis; Depression; Prognostic factor; Psychosocial factors; Spinal stenosis; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24417814     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  25 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis. From diagnosis to correct therapy].

Authors:  A Benditz; J Grifka; J Matussek
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Relationship between depression and clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Dane Moran; Thomas Kostowski; Risheng Xu; Rory Goodwin; Benjamin Elder; Seba Ramhmdani; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Perioperative Considerations for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Undergoing Surgery.

Authors:  Edwin N Aroke; Alexis N Robinson; Bryan A Wilbanks
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.084

6.  Preoperative Mental Health May Not Be Predictive of Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Benjamin C Mayo; Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Dustin H Massel; Daniel D Bohl; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

7.  The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Michael Schneider; Kelly Williams; Susan Zickmund; Megan Hamm; Kent Stuber; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2017-03

8.  Concomitant back and leg pain as predictors for trajectories of poor outcome after single level lumbar micro-decompression alone and with micro-discectomy: a study of 3,308 patients.

Authors:  Roberto Carrasco; Mahmoud Elmalky; Silviu Sabou; John Leach; Rajat Verma; Saeed Mohammad; Irfan Siddique
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

9.  A case control series for the effect of photobiomodulation in patients with low back pain and concurrent depression.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Samuel R Petrie; David Mischoulon; Michael R Hamblin; Albert Yeung; Lisa Sangermano; Paolo Cassano
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-09-30

10.  The impact of incidental durotomy on the outcome of decompression surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data--a Swiss prospective multi-center cohort study.

Authors:  Nils H Ulrich; Jakob M Burgstaller; Florian Brunner; François Porchet; Mazda Farshad; Giuseppe Pichierri; Johann Steurer; Ulrike Held
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.