Literature DB >> 24417702

How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a matter of etymology.

Alfonso Esposito1, Matthias Kirschberg.   

Abstract

The word 'metagenomic' is one of the most used words in environmental microbiology especially in recent years, yet sometimes it is a little overused. Can studies targeting a single gene be considered 'metagenomic'? It is more controversial than once thought, maybe a possible solution may come from an etymological analysis of the word.
© 2014 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metagenetics; metagenomics; nomenclature

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24417702     DOI： 10.1111/1574-6968.12375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN： 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Common and Emerging Bioinformatics Pipelines for Targeted Metagenomics.

Authors:  Léa Siegwald; Hélène Touzet; Yves Lemoine; David Hot; Christophe Audebert; Ségolène Caboche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Comparison of Two DNA Metagenomic Bioinformatic Pipelines While Evaluating the Microbial Diversity in Feces of Tanzanian Small Holder Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Felix M Kibegwa; Rawlynce C Bett; Charles K Gachuiri; Francesca Stomeo; Fidalis D Mujibi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Colonization with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis is associated with increased diversity of human gut bacterial microbiota.

Authors:  Christophe Audebert; Gaël Even; Amandine Cian; Alexandre Loywick; Sophie Merlin; Eric Viscogliosi; Magali Chabé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Diversity of Bacterial Biofilm Communities on Sprinklers from Dairy Farm Cooling Systems in Israel.

Authors:  Nahum Y Shpigel; Zohar Pasternak; Gilad Factor; Yuval Gottlieb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative study of gut microbiota in wild and captive Malaysian Mahseer (Tor tambroides).

Authors:  Chun K Tan; Ikhsan Natrah; Iswan B Suyub; Marilyn J Edward; Nazrien Kaman; Anjas A Samsudin
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.139
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.