| Literature DB >> 24416408 |
Ruiying Chang1, Tiantian Jin2, Yihe Lü3, Guohua Liu3, Bojie Fu3.
Abstract
Cropland afforestation has been widely found to increase soil organicEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24416408 PMCID: PMC3885704 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Basic Descriptive Statistics of Six Plantation Sites Along a Precipitation Gradient.
| Sites | Longitude/Latitude | Temperature(°C) | Precipitation(mm) |
| Plantationage (years) | MeanDBH (cm) | Mean tree height (m) | Tree density(trees·ha−1) |
|
|
| S1 | 110.22°/37.47° | 9.5 | 380 | Cropland (4) | 0 | |||||
| Cropland (3) | 0 | |||||||||
| Y (3) | 7 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 900 | ||||||
| A (3) | 30 | 15.0 | 8.0 | 350 | ||||||
| A (4) | 30 | 14.0 | 11.0 | 700 | ||||||
| S2 | 108.11°/37.11° | 8.5 | 420 | Cropland (3) | 0 | Y (6) | ||||
| Y (3) | 8 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 1000 | ||||||
| Y (4) | 8 | 7.8 | 7.0 | 625 | Y (7) | |||||
| A (3) | 30 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 800 | ||||||
| A (5) | 25 | 10.6 | 6.0 | 625 | Y (9) | |||||
| S3 | 109.30°/36.92° | 9.0 | 460 | Cropland | 0 |
| ||||
| Cropland | 0 |
| ||||||||
| Cropland (4) | 0 | Y (8) | ||||||||
| Y (5) | 5 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 1200 | Y (16) | |||||
| Y (4) | 8 | 6.1 | 6.5 | 1950 | Y (16) | |||||
| Y (3) | 9 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 1100 | ||||||
| A (3) | 30 | 13.5 | 8.0 | 400 | ||||||
| A (3) | 30 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 1800 | ||||||
| A (5) | 30 | 16.1 | 10.0 | 500 | Y (14) | |||||
| S4 | 109.53°/36.52° | 8.7 | 530 | Cropland | 0 |
| ||||
| Cropland | 0 |
| ||||||||
| Cropland | 0 |
| ||||||||
| Y (3) | 5 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 2200 | ||||||
| Y (3) | 9 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 2700 | ||||||
| Y (3) | 9 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 2300 | ||||||
| A (3) | 25 | 9.0 | 6.8 | 1800 | ||||||
| A (3) | 30 | 10.5 | 6.5 | 2000 | ||||||
| A (3) | 30 | 18.0 | 7.0 | 1500 | ||||||
| S5 | 109.18°/36.07° | 9.2 | 580 | Cropland | 0 |
| ||||
| Cropland (5) | 0 | Y (10) | ||||||||
| Y (3) | 5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1400 | Y (8) | |||||
| Y (3) | 6 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 5200 | ||||||
| Y (3) | 8 | – | – | – | Tree census not detected | |||||
| Y (4) | 8 | 5.6 | 7.0 | 2700 | Y (16) | |||||
| A (3) | 26 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 1000 | ||||||
| A (4) | 28 | 13.2 | 15.0 | 1300 | ||||||
| A (5) | 30 | 7.1 | 7.5 | 1700 | Y (17) | |||||
| S6 | 109.12°/35.33° | 8.5 | 650 | Cropland (4) | 0 | |||||
| Cropland (5) | 0 | Y (10) | ||||||||
| Y (3) | 5 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 3000 | ||||||
| Y (3) | 6 | 5.2 | 6.5 | 3800 | ||||||
| Y (6) | 8 | 5.6 | 8.0 | 3200 | Y (24) | |||||
| Y (3) | 9 | 5.8 | 8.0 | 4000 | ||||||
| A (3) | 25 | 9.2 | 12.0 | 2200 | ||||||
| A (3) | 30 | 14.3 | 13.0 | 1000 | ||||||
| A (5) | 30 | 13.8 | 13.0 | 1550 | Y (20) |
a Y and A indicate younger and older plantations, respectively. The number in the parentheses is the soil sample size in each stand.
b Y (Yes) indicates that the fine root biomass was collected in this stand. The number in the parentheses is the sample size.
c The data on soil organic carbon, total nitrogen content, and soil bulk density of some croplands were cited from other studies in the same site, and the data in the other cropland and forest stands were collected and analyzed in this paper. There was no tree census of the S5 forest stand, but the soil properties were measured.
Figure 1Comparison of fine root biomass among cropland and younger and older plantations in each site as well as among the younger and older plantations in four sites.
Younger plantations are 5- to 9-year- old and older plantations are 25- to 30- year-old forests, respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the means. The sample numbers are shown in Table 1. A different lowercase English letter is used for cropland and for younger and older plantations in the same site, and a different uppercase English letter represents younger plantations across the sites, whereas a different Greek letter is used for older plantations to indicate a significant difference at the 0.05 level.
Figure 2Relationship between mean annual precipitation and soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN) stock, and C:N ratio in cropland and younger and older plantations.
Younger and older plantations are 5- to 9-year-old and 25- to 30-year-old forests, respectively. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the means (only shown in positive, n = three to six for each stand). The data for some cropland stands were cited from other studies (Table 1). Regressions were conducted for the top 20 cm of soil, and only significant regression models are displayed.
Changes in Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and Soil Total Nitrogen (STN) Stocks in Younger (n = 17 and 15 for SOC and STN, Respectively) and Older Plantations (n = 16 and 15 for SOC and STN, Respectively) Established on Croplands.
| Afforestationstages | Absolute SOC change(Mg C·ha–1) | Relative SOC change (%) | Absolute STN change(Mg N·ha–1) | Relative STN change (%) | ||||||||
| 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 0–20 cm | 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 0–20 cm | 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 0–20 cm | 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 0–20 cm | |
| Youngerplantation | 0.43 | −1.45 | −1.01 | 16.6 | −20.9 | −2.3 | 0.12 | −0.08 | 0.04 | 21.5 | −9.8 | 5.5 |
| (−0.44/1.31) | (−2.07/−0.82) | (−2.41/0.38) | (−4.7/37.8) | (−30.9/−10.9) | (−16.8/12.3) | (0.01/0.23) | (−0.17/0.01) | (−0.16/0.23) | (3.8/39.1) | (−19.5/−0.2) | (−7.1/18.2) | |
| Olderplantation | 6.70 | 0.85 | 7.57 | 161.1 | 27.1 | 93.8 | 0.66 | 0.11 | 0.77 | 109.4 | 18.4 | 63.5 |
| (4.79/8.65) | (−0.23/1.93) | (4.85/10.29) | (97.5/224.4) | (3.9/50.4) | (52.3/135.4) | (0.41/0.91) | (0.01/0.21) | (0.45/1.10) | (63.8/154.9) | (5.0/31.8) | (35.8/91.2) | |
Significant at 0.05 level compared with the value of zero (one-sample T test).
The numbers in parentheses indicate the 95% confidence interval.
Younger and older plantations mean 5- to 9-year-old and 25- to 30-year-old plantations, respectively.
Figure 3Relationship between mean annual precipitation and the absolute and relative change in soil organic carbon (SOC) in younger and older plantations.
Younger and older plantations are 5- to 9-year-old and 25- to 30-year-old forests, respectively. Regressions were conducted separately for different soil layers, and only significant regression models are displayed. Positive values indicate an increase in the SOC stock due to afforestation, and negative values indicate a decrease.
Figure 4Association of absolute and relative change in soil total nitrogen (STN) in younger and older plantations with mean annual precipitation.
Younger and older plantations mean 5- to 9-year-old and 25- to 30-year-old forests, respectively. Positive values indicate an increase in the STN stock due to afforestation, and negative values indicate a decrease. No significant association was found.
Figure 5Relationship of changes in absolute soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) (A), changes in relative SOC and STN (B), and changes in the C:N ratio in younger (C) and older (D) plantations with mean annual precipitation.
Younger and older plantations mean 5- to 9-year-old and 25- to 30-year-old forests, respectively. The dashed line in panel B indicates the 1∶1 line. Values greater than 1.0 in panels C and D indicate a relative gain of SOC to STN following afforestation, and lower values indicate the inverse.