| Literature DB >> 24416155 |
Natasha E McGowan1, Nikki J Marks1, Colin J McInnes2, David Deane2, Aaron G Maule1, Michael Scantlebury1.
Abstract
Invasive species have been cited as major causes of population extinctions in several animal and plant classes worldwide. The North American grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) has a major detrimental effect on native red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) populations across Britain and Ireland, in part because it can be a reservoir host for the deadly squirrelpox virus (SQPV). Whilst various researchers have investigated the epizootiology of SQPV disease in grey squirrels and have modelled the consequent effects on red squirrel populations, less work has examined morphological and physiological characteristics that might make individual grey squirrels more susceptible to contracting SQPV. The current study investigated the putative relationships between morphology, parasitism, and SQPV exposure in grey squirrels. We found geographical, sex, and morphological differences in SQPV seroprevalence. In particular, larger animals, those with wide zygomatic arch widths (ZAW), males with large testes, and individuals with concurrent nematode and/or coccidial infections had an increased seroprevalence of SQPV. In addition, males with larger spleens, particularly those with narrow ZAW, were more likely to be exposed to SQPV. Overall these results show that there is variation in SQPV seroprevalence in grey squirrels and that, consequently, certain individual, or populations of, grey squirrels might be more responsible for transmitting SQPV to native red squirrel populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24416155 PMCID: PMC3885396 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1(A) Distribution of sampling locations across various forests in N.I. (B) Percentage of specimens (± S.E.) found to be positive for squirrelpox virus within each location. Forest locations are denoted as: PG – Portglenone; GF – Gosford; DM – Drum Manor; DB – Drumbanagher; LG – Loughgall; BR – Belvoir; LF – Larchfield; DN – Derrynoyd; LN – Lissan; TM – Tollymore.
Statistical models.
| Model | Cohort | Maximal model | Minimal model | Sig. effects | z | P |
| A | All | BM+ZAW+SPL+BM*ZAW+BM*SPL+ZAW*SPL | BM+ZAW+SPL+BM*ZAW+ZAW*SPL | BM | 2.47 | 0.014 |
| B | All | BM+ZAW+SPL+COX+NEM+ECT+BM*ZAW+BM*SPL+BM*COX+BM*NEM+BM*ECT+ZAW*SPL+ZAW*COX+ZAW*NEM+ZAW*ECT+SPL*COX+SPL*NEM+SPL*ECT+C*NEM+COX*ECT+NEM*ECT | BM+SPL+ZAW+NEM+COX+ZAW*SPL+ZAW*NEM+ZAW*COX | NS | NS | NS |
| C1 | All | BM+SPL+ZAW+SEX+BM*SPL+BM*ZAW+BM*SEX+SPL*ZAW+SPL*SEX+ZAW*SEX | BM+SPL | BM | 2.98 | 0.003 |
| C2 | All | COX+NEM+ECT+SEX+COX*NEM+COX*ECT+COX*SEX+NEM*ECT+NEM*SEX+ECT*SEX | NEM | NS | NS | NS |
| D | Males | BM+TES+ZAW+SPL+BM*TES+BM*ZAW+BM*SPL+TES*ZAW+TES*SPL+ZAW*SPL | BM+SPL+TES+BM*TES | SPL; TES | 1.97; 3.38 | 0.049; <0.001 |
| E | Males | BM+SPL+TES+ZAW+COX+BM*SPL+BM*TES+BM*ZAW+BM*COX+SPL*TES+SPL*ZAW+SPL*COX+TES*ZAW+TES*COX+ZAW*COX | BM+SPL+TES+ZAW+COX+BM*SPL+BM*TES+BM*COX+ZAW*COX | TES; COX; BM*TES; BM*COX | 2.81; −2.31; −2.18; 2.30 | 0.005; 0.021; 0.030; 0.022 |
| F | Males | BM+SPL+ZAW+NEM+BM*SPL+BM*ZAW+BM*NEM+SPL*ZAW+SPL*NEM+ZAW*NEM | BM+SPL+ZAW+NEM+BM*ZAW+SPL*ZAW+ZAW*NEM | ZAW; BM*ZAW; SPL*ZAW; ZAW*NEM | −2.67; −2.18; −3.01; 2.55 | 0.007; 0.029; 0.003; 0.011 |
| G | Males | BM+SPL+TES+ZAW+ECT+BM*SPL+BM*TES+BM*ZAW+SPL*TES+SPL*ZAW+SPL*ECT TES*ZAW | BM+SPL+ZAW+TES+BM*SPL+BM*ZAW+SPL*ZAW | SPL*ZAW | −2.01 | 0.045 |
Statistical models used to determine the effects of various morphological features as well as parasitism and sex on SQPV exposure. All models used a binomial distribution and log link function. Abbreviations are denoted as follows: BM = Body mass, SPL = Spleen mass, TES = Mass of testes, ZAW = Zygomatic arch width, SEA = Season, COX = Coccidial burden, NEM = Nematode burden, ECT = Ectoparasite burden, SEX = Sex, “*” = interaction, NS = No significance (p>0.05 for all effects in minimal model).
Sex differences in morphology and parasitism.
| Males | Females | ||||||
| Feature | N | Mean | S.E. | N | Mean | S.E. | P |
| Body mass (g) | 151 | 528 | 8 | 130 | 545 | 8 | 0.28 |
| ZAW (mm) | 148 | 33.8 | 0.3 | 127 | 33.5 | 0.3 | 0.49 |
| Spleen mass (g) | 151 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 126 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 0.66 |
| Mass of testes (g) | 152 | 0.47 | 0.04 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ticks | 127 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 105 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.036 |
| Fleas | 127 | 4.77 | 1.18 | 105 | 2.11 | 0.28 | 0.06 |
| Mites | 107 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 92 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.87 |
| Lice | 127 | 1.13 | 0.21 | 105 | 0.84 | 0.19 | 0.08 |
| Total ectoparasites | 127 | 5.99 | 1.21 | 105 | 2.98 | 0.36 | 0.06 |
| Nematodes | 151 | 3.83 | 0.59 | 130 | 6.08 | 0.92 | 0.10 |
| Coccidial score | 139 | 1* | 0.1* | 117 | 1* | 0.2* | 0.74 |
Mean, standard error of the mean (S.E.) (* denotes median and standard error of the median), and sample size (N) of various internal and external morphometrics (measured in grams (g) and millimetres (mm)), and ecto- and endo-parasite burdens in males and females. Also shown are the p-values (P) from Mann-Whitney U tests examining sex differences for each parameter. No sex differences were evident in any of these tests (p>0.05) except with tick burden where males exhibited higher burdens than females (p = 0.036).
Figure 2Effect of ZAW (cm), and spleen size (Small, Large) on prevalence of SQPV in males.
Non-infected individuals are denoted by open bars, infected individuals by dark bars. Plot “whiskers” denote maximum and minimum values, and “box” shows upper and lower quartiles and the median. Outliers are shown as open circles and are defined as datapoints which lie outside the range of the upper quartile+1.5 times the interquartile range, or the lower quartile−1.5 times the interquartile range.