Literature DB >> 24415981

Cross-national comparison of medical costs shared by payers and patients: a study of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer based on assumption case scenarios and reimbursement fees.

Shota Hamada1, Shiro Hinotsu1, Hiroshi Ishiguro2, Masakazu Toi3, Koji Kawakami1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country.
RESULTS: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (€ 3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (€ 548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (€ ∼25,000 vs. € 8,627).
CONCLUSION: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Cost-sharing; Health care system; Reimbursement

Year:  2013        PMID: 24415981      PMCID: PMC3808215          DOI: 10.1159/000354249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  24 in total

1.  How health insurance design affects access to care and costs, by income, in eleven countries.

Authors:  Cathy Schoen; Robin Osborn; David Squires; Michelle M Doty; Roz Pierson; Sandra Applebaum
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  NICE recommends abiraterone for prostate cancer after manufacturer reduces price.

Authors:  Zosia Kmietowicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-18

3.  Japanese universal health coverage: evolution, achievements, and challenges.

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami; Byung-Kwang Yoo; Hideki Hashimoto; Masatoshi Matsumoto; Hiroya Ogata; Akira Babazono; Ryo Watanabe; Kenji Shibuya; Bong-Min Yang; Michael R Reich; Yasuki Kobayashi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  How well do diagnosis-related group systems group breast cancer surgery patients? Evidence from 10 European countries.

Authors:  David Scheller-Kreinsen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A comparison of international breast cancer guidelines - do the national guidelines differ in treatment recommendations?

Authors:  R Wolters; A C Regierer; L Schwentner; V Geyer; K Possinger; R Kreienberg; M B Wischnewsky; A Wöckel
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Treatment costs of prostate cancer in the first year after diagnosis: a short-term cost of illness study for France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.

Authors:  Richard Olivier Fourcade; Agnes Benedict; Libby K Black; Michael E Stokes; Antonio Alcaraz; Ramiro Castro
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Costs of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: a micro-costing approach based on healthcare payer's data sources.

Authors:  J Ruof; J L Hülsemann; T Mittendorf; S Handelmann; J M von der Schulenburg; H Zeidler; S Merkesdal
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.

Authors:  C Robertson; S K Arcot Ragupathy; C Boachie; J M Dixon; C Fraser; R Hernández; S Heys; W Jack; G R Kerr; G Lawrence; G MacLennan; A Maxwell; J McGregor; G Mowatt; S Pinder; L Ternent; R E Thomas; L Vale; R Wilson; S Zhu; F J Gilbert
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; A S Coates; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.