Shota Hamada1, Shiro Hinotsu1, Hiroshi Ishiguro2, Masakazu Toi3, Koji Kawakami1. 1. Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Japan. 2. Outpatient Oncology Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Japan. 3. Department of Breast Cancer Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country. RESULTS: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (€ 3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (€ 548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (€ ∼25,000 vs. € 8,627). CONCLUSION: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country. RESULTS: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (€ 3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (€ 548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (€ ∼25,000 vs. € 8,627). CONCLUSION: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Cost-sharing; Health care system; Reimbursement
Authors: R Wolters; A C Regierer; L Schwentner; V Geyer; K Possinger; R Kreienberg; M B Wischnewsky; A Wöckel Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Richard Olivier Fourcade; Agnes Benedict; Libby K Black; Michael E Stokes; Antonio Alcaraz; Ramiro Castro Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: J Ruof; J L Hülsemann; T Mittendorf; S Handelmann; J M von der Schulenburg; H Zeidler; S Merkesdal Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: C Robertson; S K Arcot Ragupathy; C Boachie; J M Dixon; C Fraser; R Hernández; S Heys; W Jack; G R Kerr; G Lawrence; G MacLennan; A Maxwell; J McGregor; G Mowatt; S Pinder; L Ternent; R E Thomas; L Vale; R Wilson; S Zhu; F J Gilbert Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.014