Jasmin Balmer1, Rui Ji2, Thomas A Ray2, Fabia Selber3, Max Gassmann4, Neal S Peachey5, Ronald G Gregg2, Volker Enzmann3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland ; Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Switzerland. 2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Louisville, KY. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland. 4. Institute of Veterinary Physiology, University of Zürich, Switzerland. 5. Department of Ophthalmic Research, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH ; Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland OH ; Department of Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the mutation responsible for an abnormal electroretinogram (ERG) in a transgenic mouse line (tg21) overexpressing erythropoietin (Epo). The tg21 line was generated on a mixed (C3H; C57BL/6) background and lacked the b-wave component of the ERG. This no-b-wave (nob) ERG is seen in other mouse models with depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) dysfunction and in patients with the complete form of congenital stationary night blindness (cCSNB). We determined the basis for the nob ERG phenotype and screened C3H mice for the mutation to evaluate whether this finding is important for the vision research community. METHODS: ERGs were used to examine retinal function. The retinal structure of the transgenic mice was investigated using histology and immunohistochemistry. Inverse PCR was performed to identify the insertion site of the Epo transgene in the mouse genome. Affected mice were backcrossed to follow the inheritance pattern of the nob ERG phenotype. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT PCR), Sanger sequencing, and immunohistochemistry were used to identify the mutation causing the defect. Additional C3H sublines were screened for the detected mutation. RESULTS: Retinal histology and blood vessel structure were not disturbed, and no loss of DBCs was observed in the tg21 nob mice. The mutation causing the nob ERG phenotype is inherited independently of the tg21 transgene. The qRT PCR experiments revealed that the nob ERG phenotype reflected a mutation in Gpr179, a gene involved in DBC signal transduction. PCR analysis confirmed the presence of the Gpr179(nob5) insertional mutation in intron 1 of Gpr179. Screening for mutations in other C3H-derived lines revealed that C3H.Pde6b(+) mice carry the Gpr179 (nob5) allele whereas C3H/HeH mice do not. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the presence of the Gpr179(nob5) mutation causing DBC dysfunction in a C3H-derived transgenic mouse line. The nob phenotype is not related to the presence of the transgene. The Gpr179(nob5) allele can be added to the list of background alleles that impact retinal function in commonly used mouse lines. By providing primers to distinguish between Gpr179 mutant and wild-type alleles, this study allows investigators to monitor for the presence of the Gpr179(nob5) mutation in other mouse lines derived from C3H.
PURPOSE: To identify the mutation responsible for an abnormal electroretinogram (ERG) in a transgenic mouse line (tg21) overexpressing erythropoietin (Epo). The tg21 line was generated on a mixed (C3H; C57BL/6) background and lacked the b-wave component of the ERG. This no-b-wave (nob) ERG is seen in other mouse models with depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) dysfunction and in patients with the complete form of congenital stationary night blindness (cCSNB). We determined the basis for the nob ERG phenotype and screened C3H mice for the mutation to evaluate whether this finding is important for the vision research community. METHODS: ERGs were used to examine retinal function. The retinal structure of the transgenic mice was investigated using histology and immunohistochemistry. Inverse PCR was performed to identify the insertion site of the Epo transgene in the mouse genome. Affected mice were backcrossed to follow the inheritance pattern of the nob ERG phenotype. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT PCR), Sanger sequencing, and immunohistochemistry were used to identify the mutation causing the defect. Additional C3H sublines were screened for the detected mutation. RESULTS: Retinal histology and blood vessel structure were not disturbed, and no loss of DBCs was observed in the tg21 nobmice. The mutation causing the nob ERG phenotype is inherited independently of the tg21 transgene. The qRT PCR experiments revealed that the nob ERG phenotype reflected a mutation in Gpr179, a gene involved in DBC signal transduction. PCR analysis confirmed the presence of the Gpr179(nob5) insertional mutation in intron 1 of Gpr179. Screening for mutations in other C3H-derived lines revealed that C3H.Pde6b(+) mice carry the Gpr179 (nob5) allele whereas C3H/HeHmice do not. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the presence of the Gpr179(nob5) mutation causing DBC dysfunction in a C3H-derived transgenic mouse line. The nob phenotype is not related to the presence of the transgene. The Gpr179(nob5) allele can be added to the list of background alleles that impact retinal function in commonly used mouse lines. By providing primers to distinguish between Gpr179 mutant and wild-type alleles, this study allows investigators to monitor for the presence of the Gpr179(nob5) mutation in other mouse lines derived from C3H.
The purpose of this report is to define the underlying cause of an electroretinogram (ERG) abnormality noted in a transgenic mouse line (tg21) designed to overexpress erythropoietin (Epo) in the retina and the brain. The original goal of the study was to evaluate the potential of Epo for neuroprotection since Epo is beneficial in several animal models [1-3]. ERG analysis of multiple tg21 animals noted that the ERG a-wave, reflecting activity of retina photoreceptors [4], was retained while the b-wave, representing the response of depolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs) [5], was absent. This no-b-wave (nob) phenotype was similar to that reported for mouse models of DBC dysfunction due to mutations in Nyctalopin (Nyx) [6], G-protein coupled receptor 179 (Gpr179) [7], Glutamate receptor metabotropic 6 (Grm6) [8], or Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 1 (Trpm1) [9-12].To understand the basis of the nob ERG phenotype of tg21 mice, we conducted a series of morphological and molecular studies to evaluate potential explanations. We also performed a mapping cross to identify the locus of the gene involved. These studies demonstrated that the nob ERG phenotype was not associated with a loss of retinal neurons including DBCs, or abnormal retinal vasculature. In fact, the ERG nob phenotype was inherited independently of the tg21 transgene. We measured gene expression levels for Nyx, Gpr179, Grm6, and Trpm1 and found that Gpr179 was significantly decreased in affected animals. Further analysis indicated that the nob ERG phenotype reflected a large insertion in the Gpr179 locus, the same mutation recently reported in Gpr179mice [7], and that this mutation is present in additional C3H-derived mouse lines. We provide evidence that mice investigated by Hoelter and colleagues characterized by a nob ERG phenotype carry the Gpr179 mutation [13]. These observations indicate that the Gpr179 mutation likely appeared many years ago, and that it may be present in additional lines beyond those examined here.
Methods
Mice
The tg21 mice were originally generated to study the effect of constitutively overexpressed Epo in vascular diseases [14] and were provided by Prof. Max Gassmann, University of Zürich. They were bred to create a line homozygous for the transgene and were maintained in a 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle with food and water ad libitum. To map the trait underlying the nob ERG phenotype, affected tg21 mice were mated to DBA/2N mice (Charles River WIGA, Sulzfeld, Germany) to generate F1 progeny. F1 mice were intercrossed to generate the F2 progeny used for mapping based on ERG analysis. C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River. Experiments were conducted according to the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research following government approval.We also examined genomic DNA from C3H/HeH and C3H.Pde6b+ mice generously provided by Dr. Martin Fray (MRC Harwell, Oxfordshire, UK) and from C57BL/6 and Gpr179mice.
Molecular cloning of the erythropoietin insertion site in tg21
Genomic DNA was isolated using the Gen Elute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Inverse PCR was used to clone sequences flanking the Epo transgene. Briefly, primers were designed to the known sequence adjacent to an EcoRI restriction site located in the known platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) promoter. Following enzymatic digestion using EcoRI, the enzyme was inactivated by heating at 65 °C for 15 min, the DNA was diluted, and T4 DNA ligase added to circularize the EcoRI fragments. This DNA was used as input for PCR using AccuPrime Taq Polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and the primer pair tg21 inv1 and tg21 inv2 (Table 1) as recommended by the manufacturer. A 600 bp junction fragment was amplified and sequenced to identify the genomic insertion site of the tg21 Epo transgene.
Table 1
Primers
Primer name
Primer sequence (5′ – 3′)
tg21inv1
CCAGGGCAGGATCTGAATTC
tg21inv2
CCCTCCATCTAGCCTCAACC
Chr8–01
CCCACCATGTGACAAAACTA
Chr8–03
CAGCTCTGGTAAAGGAGGAA
hPDGF fwd
CCATCTCCAGGTTGAGGC
hPDGF rev
GTCTCTGAGAGCCGAGC
Gpr179 fwd
TGTGCCTGGGTATCTGTTGA
Gpr179 rev
GCTTACACACTTACACACAGATAGAT
Gpr179 insert
GCATGTGCCAAGGGTATCTT
For genotyping purposes, genomic DNA was isolated as described, and F2 animals were genotyped for the Epo insertion and for markers specific to the wild-type flanking sites of the Epo insertion site. Primers used are listed in Table 1. The Epo insert was identified with PCR using the primers 5′-hPDGF of the human promoter and the 3′-hPDGF primer [15]. To differentiate between tg21/tg21 homozygous and tg21/+ heterozygous animals, a PCR using primers on chromosome 8 (Primer Chr8–01, Chr8–03) that flank the transgene was used. PCR amplifications were performed using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad, Cressier, Switzerland) on a MyiQ single color Real-time PCR detection system (BioRad). Cycling conditions were 45 cycles comprising a 30 s step of denaturation at 95 °C, a 30 s annealing step at 60 °C (for Chr8–01/Chr8–03 primers) or 64 °C (for hPDGF primers), and a 30 s extension period at 72 °C.
Electroretinography
Animals were dark-adapted overnight, and all procedures were performed under dim red light. Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (80 mg/kg; Ketalar, Pfizer, Zürich, Switzerland) and medetomidine (1 mg/kg; Domitor; Orion Pharma, Espoo, Finland). Pupils were dilated with eye drops (2.5% phenylephrine + 0.5% tropicamide; MIX-Augentropfen, ISPI, Bern, Switzerland), and the anesthetized mice were placed on a temperature-controlled heating table (Roland Consult, Brandenburg, Germany). ERGs were recorded simultaneously from both eyes with gold wire electrodes, which touched the central cornea of each eye and were wetted with 1% methylcellulose (OmniVision, Santa Clara, CA). A gold wire electrode (0.2 mm diameter) placed in the mouth was used as a reference electrode, and another electrode positioned on the tail served as the ground electrode. Strobe flashes of light were presented in a Q400 Ganzfeld bowl, and responses were amplified, averaged, and stored using a RetiScan-RetiPort electrophysiology unit (Roland Consult, Brandenburg, Germany). ERGs were obtained to 0.47 log cd∙s/m2 strobe flash stimuli presented in the dark or superimposed upon a steady adapting field (25 cd/m2), following a 10 min light adaption period.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Mouse eyecups were freshly prepared by removing the cornea and the lens. Following fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), the tissue was snap frozen in optimum cutting temperature (OCT) compound or embedded in paraffin, and either 7 µm (OCT) or 5 µm (paraffin) thick sections were cut.Sagittal paraffin sections at the level of the optic nerve head were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and used for retinal thickness measurements. The thickness of each cellular and plexiform layer was calculated using ImagePro software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD) at six different locations (400, 1,000, and 1,600 µm inferior and superior to the edge of the ONH).Paraffin sections were rehydrated and, following antigen retrieval, permeabilized and incubated with blocking solution (10% normal goat serum and 1% bovine serum albumin dissolved in TBS (Tris-buffered Saline; 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) supplemented with 0.025% Tween-20) for 1 h. Sections were then incubated with the primary antibody (anti-protein kinase C alpha, 1:500; Sigma Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) at 4 °C overnight. As a secondary antibody, a goat anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 488 antibody (1:500; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used.Cryosections were blocked (5% horse serum/0.5% Tween-20 in TBS) for 1 h and incubated with primary antibody (sheep anti-Gpr179 [7] 1:1,000 in 5% horse serum/0.5% Tween-20 in TBS) at 4 °C overnight. A secondary antibody, donkey anti-sheepAlexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen), was applied in a 1:500 dilution for 45 min. After staining, the sections were mounted using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Orton Southgate, UK).The retinal vasculature was visualized using a published procedure [16]. Briefly, eyes were enucleated and fixed in 2% PFA for 5 min. Following removal of lens and cornea, the sensory retina was dissected out, flattened and postfixed in 4% PFA for another 10 min. Flat mounts were then incubated for 1 h in blocking solution consisting of 1% fetal bovine serum diluted in 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate buffered saline. Retinas were incubated overnight in Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin IB4-Alexa488 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad CA) diluted 1:1000 in blocking solution. Following washing steps, flat mounts were mounted using fluorescent mounting medium (DAKO, Baar, Switzerland) and digital images were recorded using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for bipolar cell genes
TaqMan Gene expression assays were used to compare expression levels of DBC genes. Following RNA isolation of retinal tissues, reverse transcription was performed using the SuperScript II First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). PCR amplifications on cDNA were conducted using the TaqMan gene expression assays on a Real-Time PCR System (7900HT; Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Values were normalized to control measures, and actin served as the internal standard.
Detection of the Gpr179 mutation
To confirm the presence of a mutation in intron 1 of Gpr179, mouse-specific primers (Gpr179 forward, Gpr179 reverse; Table 1) were designed to amplify an intron fragment that encompassed the transposon insertion site in Gpr179mice. Sequencing of a PCR fragment enabled the design of a primer (Gpr179 insert; Table 1) on the insertion site. To identify the position of the insertion site in the mouse genome, the BLAT program (UCSC Genome Browser) was used.PCR amplifications were performed as described using an annealing step at 60 °C and a mix of all three Gpr179 primers (Table 1) and genomic DNA as the template. PCR products were analyzed on 2.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using the Versa Doc Imaging System (BioRad).
Results
Identification of a no-b-wave electroretinogram phenotype
During the course of the baseline ERG studies of tg21 animals, we observed that animals from this line lacked the b-wave. In Figure 1, representative ERGs obtained from a tg21 mouse and a C57BL/6 mouse are compared in response to 0.47 log cd s/m2 stimuli presented under either dark-adapted (left) or light-adapted (right) conditions. Under both adaptation conditions, the ERGs obtained from the tg21 mice were markedly abnormal. In the dark-adapted state, the ERGs of the tg21 mice lacked the b-wave that normally follows the a-wave. Under light-adapted conditions (right), the major positive component of the cone ERG was reduced in the tg21 mice.
Figure 1
Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from 6-week old tg21 animals (blue tracings) and C57BL/6 WT mice (black tracings) in response to 0.47 log cd∙s/m2 strobe flashes presented under dark-adapted (left) or light-adapted (right) recording conditions. In comparison to the wild type (WT) response, the b-wave component is markedly reduced in tg21 mice.
Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from 6-week old tg21 animals (blue tracings) and C57BL/6 WT mice (black tracings) in response to 0.47 log cd∙s/m2 strobe flashes presented under dark-adapted (left) or light-adapted (right) recording conditions. In comparison to the wild type (WT) response, the b-wave component is markedly reduced in tg21 mice.
Retinal histology, bipolar cell morphology, and retinal vasculature are normal in tg21 no-b-wave mice
To dissect the basis for the nob ERGs of the tg21 mice, we examined the overall retinal structure. In Figure 2A, the retinal cross sections obtained from a non-transgenic mouse with a normal b-wave (left) are compared with those of a tg21 nobmouse (right). All cellular and plexiform layers are present in the tg21 nob retina, which is generally comparable to that of the wild-type (WT) retina. This impression was confirmed when each cellular and plexiform layer was measured. As shown in Figure 2B, there was no significant difference between the retinal morphology of the WT and tg21 nobmice, including the inner nuclear layer (INL), where DBC cell bodies are located.
Figure 2
Normal retinal structure is visible in tg21 nob mice. A: Retinal cross-sections obtained from 6-week old non-transgenic (left) and tg21 nob (right) littermates. The appearance of the WT and tg21 nob retinas is comparable. B: Thickness of individual plexiform or cellular layers was assessed in WT and tg21 nob retinas. There was no significant difference observable in any retinal layer. Bars indicate mean (± S.D. of 4 mice). Abbreviations: ONL represents the outer nuclear layer; OPL represents the outer plexiform layer; INL represents the inner nuclear layer; IPL represents the inner plexiform layer; GCL represents the ganglion cell layer.
Normal retinal structure is visible in tg21 nobmice. A: Retinal cross-sections obtained from 6-week old non-transgenic (left) and tg21 nob (right) littermates. The appearance of the WT and tg21 nob retinas is comparable. B: Thickness of individual plexiform or cellular layers was assessed in WT and tg21 nob retinas. There was no significant difference observable in any retinal layer. Bars indicate mean (± S.D. of 4 mice). Abbreviations: ONL represents the outer nuclear layer; OPL represents the outer plexiform layer; INL represents the inner nuclear layer; IPL represents the inner plexiform layer; GCL represents the ganglion cell layer.To examine whether the ERG phenotype of tg21 nobmice might reflect a loss of DBCs [17], we assessed DBC morphology using the DBC marker anti-protein kinase C alpha. As shown in Figure 3, DBCs are present in the tg21 nob retina, and their appearance is comparable to that of WT DBCs.
Figure 3
Retinal cross sections were stained for normal depolarizing bipolar cell function using an antibody against protein kinase C alpha (PKCα; green) and with a cell body label (blue). Depolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs) are present in the tg21 no b-wave (nob) retina (right), with a distribution that is comparable to that of non-transgenic (left) littermates.
Retinal cross sections were stained for normal depolarizing bipolar cell function using an antibody against protein kinase C alpha (PKCα; green) and with a cell body label (blue). Depolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs) are present in the tg21 no b-wave (nob) retina (right), with a distribution that is comparable to that of non-transgenic (left) littermates.ERG b-wave amplitudes are sensitive to changes in ocular blood flow [18] and can be strongly reduced or increased upon changes in inner retinal blood flow [19]. High increases in retinal and blood plasma Epo levels have been associated with changes in the retinal vasculature of mice [19]. To evaluate the vasculature of tg21 nobmice, we used immunohistochemistry on retinal flat mounts to assess retinal blood vessels. No significant difference was detectable in vessel structure (primary, intermediate, and deep plexus) between the tg21 nob and WT animals with a normal ERG b-wave (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Comparison of retinal vasculature performed using retinal whole mounts of non-transgenic (left) and tg21 (right) littermates. Whole mounts were prepared with the inner retina facing upward, and stained for vascular endothelial cells using isolectin IB4.
Comparison of retinal vasculature performed using retinal whole mounts of non-transgenic (left) and tg21 (right) littermates. Whole mounts were prepared with the inner retina facing upward, and stained for vascular endothelial cells using isolectin IB4.
The electroretinogram phenotype of tg21 no-b-wave mice is not due to the erythropoietin insertion
The results presented in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 indicate that the nob ERG phenotype of tg21 mice is not caused by mechanisms that have been reported in other mouse lines, including abnormal retinal architecture [20], loss of DBCs [17], or alterations in blood flow to the inner retina [19]. To evaluate the possibility that the phenotype reflects a mutation due to the transgene insertion site [21], we used a PCR approach to clone a junction fragment with the 5′ end of the tg21 transgene. Sequence analyses identified a 115 bp fragment from mouse chromosome 8 (chr8:51,016,110–51,016,224, mm10). Examination of the genome in this region indicated that the insertion site was located in a gene desert devoid of any annotated genes. As a consequence, the nob ERG phenotype does not reflect an insertion of the transgene into a gene locus known to be required for normal DBC function.To determine whether the nob ERG phenotype cosegregated with tg21, we used a standard mapping approach in which tg21 homozygous mice were crossed to DBA/2N mice and the resulting F1 animals were intercrossed (Figure 5A). All F1 mice displayed a normal ERG, indicating that the nob ERG trait is recessive. A total of 98 F2 mice were examined with ERG and genotyped for the presence of a chr8:tg21 junction fragment or the WT allele at the tg21 insertion location (Figure 5B). As summarized in Figure 5A, 19 F2 animals (19.3%) lacked the ERG b-wave, and four of them did not inherit the tg21 transgene. Figure 5B shows the genotyping data for eight mice, including one (mouse #3) that was non-transgenic and had a nob ERG. These results indicate that the nob ERG phenotype and tg21 are inherited independently.
Figure 5
The nob ERG phenotype does not segregate with the tg21 transgene. A: Pedigree of a two-generation cross between tg21 no-b-wave and DBA/2N mice. All F1 offspring had normal electroretinograms (ERGs). A: Of 98 F2 progeny, 19 mice had a no-b-wave (nob) ERG phenotype; of these, four were non-transgenic (DBA). B: Genotyping demonstrated that tg21 and the nob ERG phenotype do not cosegregate. Note that mouse #3 is non-transgenic and has a nob ERG.
The nob ERG phenotype does not segregate with the tg21 transgene. A: Pedigree of a two-generation cross between tg21 no-b-wave and DBA/2N mice. All F1 offspring had normal electroretinograms (ERGs). A: Of 98 F2 progeny, 19 mice had a no-b-wave (nob) ERG phenotype; of these, four were non-transgenic (DBA). B: Genotyping demonstrated that tg21 and the nob ERG phenotype do not cosegregate. Note that mouse #3 is non-transgenic and has a nob ERG.
The tg21 background carries the Gpr179 mutation
To investigate whether the nob ERG phenotype is due to a mutation in a gene known to be critical to DBC function, we examined the expression levels of Nyx, Gpr179, Grm6, and Trpm1 using qRT PCR (TaqMan assays). Figure 6 shows the expression level for these genes in C57BL/6, C3H, Gpr179, and tg21 nobmice. We detected only marginal Gpr179 expression in tg21 nobmice, as well as in the Gpr179 mutant mice run as a positive control. In the tg21 nobmice, Gpr179 expression was decreased about 370-fold compared to the C57BL/6 controls (Figure 6), a reduction comparable to that reported in the Gpr179 mutant mouse [7]. To confirm that GPR179 is reduced, we compared the distribution of GPR179 in the retina of WT and tg21 nobmice. As shown in Figure 7, a robust punctate GPR179 label was observed in the outer plexiform layer of the WT animals with a normal ERG b-wave. In comparison, we did not detect GPR179 in tg21 nobmice. This finding confirmed that the mutation underlying the nob ERG phenotype results in a massive loss of GPR179 expression.
Figure 6
Expression levels of several genes required for normal depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) function in several mouse lines. Note that expression of Gpr179 was decreased 370-fold in the tg21 no b-wave (nob) mice and in Gpr179 mutant mice. Other depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) genes were expressed at normal or slightly higher than normal levels in the tg21 nob and Gpr179 mice. Values were normalized to control measures and actin served as the internal standard. Values are expressed as mean±SD (n=3).
Figure 7
Retinal cross-sections obtained from tg21 mice no b-wave mice and control littermates were stained for GPR179. Positive staining is seen as punctate distribution in the outer plexiform layer of control mice, and is absent from retinas of tg21 no b-wave (nob) mice. Abbreviations: OPL represents the outer plexiform layer; ONL represents the outer nuclear layer; INL represents the inner nuclear layer.
Expression levels of several genes required for normal depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) function in several mouse lines. Note that expression of Gpr179 was decreased 370-fold in the tg21 no b-wave (nob) mice and in Gpr179 mutant mice. Other depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) genes were expressed at normal or slightly higher than normal levels in the tg21 nob and Gpr179mice. Values were normalized to control measures and actin served as the internal standard. Values are expressed as mean±SD (n=3).Retinal cross-sections obtained from tg21 miceno b-wavemice and control littermates were stained for GPR179. Positive staining is seen as punctate distribution in the outer plexiform layer of control mice, and is absent from retinas of tg21 no b-wave (nob) mice. Abbreviations: OPL represents the outer plexiform layer; ONL represents the outer nuclear layer; INL represents the inner nuclear layer.The Gpr179 mutation arose on a C3H-derived line [7]. To determine whether the mutation underlying the tg21 nob phenotype might be the same mutation, we used primers developed to genotype the Gpr179 allele (Figure 8). These primers correctly identified each nob ERG mouse we examined (Figure 9), indicating that the Gpr179 allele underlies the nob ERG phenotype we encountered in the tg21 transgenic line. To confirm that this mutation is identical, we compared the junction fragment sequence of the insertional mutation and found these were identical (data not shown).
Figure 8
Representation of a 6.5 kb insertion in intron 1 of Gpr179 identified with polymerase chain reaction using an intron-specific primer and subsequent Sanger sequencing. The schematic indicates the presence of the mutation in intron 1 of Gpr179. The sequence obtained with PCR with an intron-specific primer (Gpr179 rev) was used to design the mutation-specific primer. All three Gpr179 primers (Table 1) were used for genotyping.
Figure 9
Agarose gel visualization of genotyped genomic deoxyribonucleic acid samples of mice screened for the Gpr179 allele and examined with electroretinogram. The yellow box highlights the observation that the no-b-wave (nob) electroretinogram (ERG) phenotype was observed only in mice that were homozygous for the Gpr179 allele.
Representation of a 6.5 kb insertion in intron 1 of Gpr179 identified with polymerase chain reaction using an intron-specific primer and subsequent Sanger sequencing. The schematic indicates the presence of the mutation in intron 1 of Gpr179. The sequence obtained with PCR with an intron-specific primer (Gpr179rev) was used to design the mutation-specific primer. All three Gpr179 primers (Table 1) were used for genotyping.Agarose gel visualization of genotyped genomic deoxyribonucleic acid samples of mice screened for the Gpr179 allele and examined with electroretinogram. The yellow box highlights the observation that the no-b-wave (nob) electroretinogram (ERG) phenotype was observed only in mice that were homozygous for the Gpr179 allele.
Gpr179 allele is present in C3H “sighted” mice
These data suggest that the Gpr179 allele arose on a common background, and may be present in other lines derived from C3H. Hoelter and colleagues [13] reported a line of “sighted” C3H.Pde6b+ mice in which the Pde6 locus was replaced by the WT allele, and did not develop the photoreceptor degeneration characteristic of C3H/HeHmice. These mice retained a normal ERG a-wave, but lacked the b-wave [13]. When we examined DNA samples from C3H/HeH and C3H.Pde6b+ mice, we observed that C3H.Pde6b+ mice carry the Gpr179 allele (Figure 10).
Figure 10
Polymerase chain reaction was performed on genomic deoxyribonucleic acid obtained from two C3H lines (C3H/HeH and C3H.Pde6b+) using the Gpr179 primers. Control mice were C57BL6 and the well-described nob5 mouse mutant [7]. C3H.Pde6b+ was homozygous mutated for Gpr179.
Polymerase chain reaction was performed on genomic deoxyribonucleic acid obtained from two C3H lines (C3H/HeH and C3H.Pde6b+) using the Gpr179 primers. Control mice were C57BL6 and the well-described nob5 mouse mutant [7]. C3H.Pde6b+ was homozygous mutated for Gpr179.
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the basis for the nob ERG phenotype identified in a line of transgenic mice overexpressing Epo in the brain and the retina. The nob ERG phenotype does not reflect a loss of DBCs or some other abnormality in the retinal structure, as all measures in the tg21 nob retinas were comparable to WT. When tg21 mice were crossed to a WT strain (DBA/2N), we observed that the nob ERG phenotype was inherited independently of the tg21 transgene. This observation proves that the nob ERG phenotype is not caused by the tg21 transgene product or insertion site. When we examined the expression of several genes required for normal DBC function, we found that the expression of Gpr179 was markedly reduced. Further analysis indicated that the nobmice studied here carry the Gpr179 allele recently identified in a mouse line also derived from C3H [7]. To evaluate whether this allele is present elsewhere, we examined another nobmouse, the “sighted” C3H.Pde6b+ mouse. The Gpr179 allele was also present in that line in which the Pde6b allele was removed. However, the mutation was not found in C3H/HeHmice that carry the Pde6 allele. These results indicate that the Gpr179 allele was present in the background strain on which the tg21 transgenic line was established or was carried by the subsequent strains used to maintain this line. In that regards, it is possible that tg21 bred in other research laboratories do not carry the Gpr179 allele, since the tg21 transgene and the Gpr179 allele might be inherited independently resulting in the potential for the WT Gpr179 allele to be crossed into the transgenic line.Identifying the Gpr179 allele in a C3H-derived line raises the possibility that it may be present in additional mouse lines. There is certainly precedent for an allele that negatively impacts retinal function to be widespread. For example, the Pdeb6 allele results in a rapid degeneration of rod and cone photoreceptors and has been identified in many mouse strains [22,23]. The Crb1 allele causes ocular lesions [24] and has been identified in multiple inbred mouse strains [25]. The Gnat2 results in one photoreceptor dysfunction and was recently identified in several inbred lines [26]. We have not conducted a thorough survey of inbred mouse lines, but the Gpr179 allele could be present in additional mouse lines, particularly those related to C3H, as each line known to carry this allele was derived from that background. Although the Gpr179 allele was not present in any commercially available C3H lines, our observation that the identical mutation has been identified on both sides of the Atlantic on a sighted C3H background suggests this allele may be widespread, although its presence could be masked by the presence of the rd1 allele. In conclusion, should a nob ERG phenotype be encountered during the course of evaluating a mouse line, it would be efficient to evaluate whether the Gpr179 allele may be responsible. If this is the case, the mutation has to be outcrossed before the animals are used for visual function experiments.
Authors: F T Ruschitzka; R H Wenger; T Stallmach; T Quaschning; C de Wit; K Wagner; R Labugger; M Kelm; G Noll; T Rülicke; S Shaw; R L Lindberg; B Rodenwaldt; H Lutz; C Bauer; T F Lüscher; M Gassmann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mary J Mattapallil; Eric F Wawrousek; Chi-Chao Chan; Hui Zhao; Jayeeta Roychoudhury; Thomas A Ferguson; Rachel R Caspi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Neal S Peachey; Jillian N Pearring; Pasano Bojang; Matthew E Hirschtritt; Gwen Sturgill-Short; Thomas A Ray; Takahisa Furukawa; Chieko Koike; Andrew F X Goldberg; Yin Shen; Maureen A McCall; Scott Nawy; Patsy M Nishina; Ronald G Gregg Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Neal S Peachey; Thomas A Ray; Ralph Florijn; Lucy B Rowe; Trijntje Sjoerdsma; Susana Contreras-Alcantara; Kenkichi Baba; Gianluca Tosini; Nikita Pozdeyev; P Michael Iuvone; Pasano Bojang; Jillian N Pearring; Huibert Jan Simonsz; Maria van Genderen; David G Birch; Elias I Traboulsi; Allison Dorfman; Irma Lopez; Huanan Ren; Andrew F X Goldberg; Patsy M Nishina; Pierre Lachapelle; Maureen A McCall; Robert K Koenekoop; Arthur A B Bergen; Maarten Kamermans; Ronald G Gregg Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Adrienne K Mehalow; Shuhei Kameya; Richard S Smith; Norman L Hawes; James M Denegre; James A Young; Lesley Bechtold; Neena B Haider; Ulrich Tepass; John R Heckenlively; Bo Chang; Jürgen K Naggert; Patsy M Nishina Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Ronald G Gregg; Suparna Mukhopadhyay; Sophie I Candille; Sherry L Ball; Machelle T Pardue; Maureen A McCall; Neal S Peachey Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Christian Grimm; Andreas Wenzel; Matthias Groszer; Helmut Mayser; Mathias Seeliger; Marijana Samardzija; Christian Bauer; Max Gassmann; Charlotte E Remé Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-06-17 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Naoyuki Tanimoto; James D Akula; Anne B Fulton; Bernhard H F Weber; Mathias W Seeliger Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Stuart N Peirson; Laurence A Brown; Carina A Pothecary; Lindsay A Benson; Angus S Fisk Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Leanne Carrott; Michael R Bowl; Carlos Aguilar; Stuart L Johnson; Lauren Chessum; Melissa West; Susan Morse; Joanne Dorning; Elizabeth Smart; Rachel Hardisty-Hughes; Greg Ball; Andrew Parker; Alun R Barnard; Robert E MacLaren; Sara Wells; Walter Marcotti; Steve D M Brown Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 6.167