Literature DB >> 24415830

POPULATION ATTRIBUTABLE FRACTION AS A MEASURE OF HERITABILITY IN DICHOTOMOUS TWIN DATA.

Viswanathan Ramakrishnan1, Leroy R Thacker1.   

Abstract

In many genetic analyses of dichotomous twin data odds ratios have been used to test hypotheses on heritability and shared common environment effects of a given disease (Lichtenstein et. al., 2000, Ahlbom et. al., 1997, Ramakrishnan, et. al., 1992, 1996). However, estimates of these two effects have not been dealt with in the literature. In epidemiology, the attributable fraction (AF), a function of the odds ratio and the prevalence of the risk factor has been used to describe the contribution of a risk factor to a disease in a given population (Leviton, 1973). In this article, we adapt the AF to quantify the heritability and the shared common environment. Twin data on cancer, gallstone disease and phobia are used to illustrate the applicability of the AF estimate as a measure of heritability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dichotomous twin data; Odds ratio; Population Attributable Fraction

Year:  2012        PMID: 24415830      PMCID: PMC3884831          DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2011.592246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput        ISSN: 0361-0918            Impact factor:   1.118


  15 in total

1.  Bivariate logistic regression: modelling the association of small for gestational age births in twin gestations.

Authors:  C V Ananth; J S Preisser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A computationally simple test of homogeneity of odds ratios for twin data.

Authors:  R A Betensky; J I Hudson; C A Jones; F Hu; B Wang; C Chen; X Xu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  The occurrence of lung cancer in man.

Authors:  M L LEVIN
Journal:  Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum       Date:  1953

4.  Univariate analysis of dichotomous or ordinal data from twin pairs: a simulation study comparing structural equation modeling and logistic regression.

Authors:  V Ramakrishnan; J M Meyer; J Goldberg; W G Henderson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Association within twin pairs for a dichotomous trait.

Authors:  J M Olson; J S Witte; R C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Use and misuse of population attributable fractions.

Authors:  B Rockhill; B Newman; C Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Letter: Definitions of attributable risk.

Authors:  A Leviton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; N V Holm; P K Verkasalo; A Iliadou; J Kaprio; M Koskenvuo; E Pukkala; A Skytthe; K Hemminki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Population attributable risks for breast cancer in Swedish women by morphological type.

Authors:  Charlotta Granström; Jan Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Commonly used estimates of the genetic contribution to disease are subject to the same fallacies as bad luck estimates.

Authors:  Jonas Björk; Tomas Andersson; Anders Ahlbom
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Emergency department personnel patient care-related COVID-19 risk.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Anusha Krishnadasan; Karisa K Harland; Patrick Ten Eyck; William R Mower; Walter A Schrading; Juan Carlos C Montoy; L Clifford McDonald; Preeta K Kutty; Elisabeth Hesse; Scott Santibanez; David N Weissman; Patricia Slev; David A Talan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Graphical comparisons of relative disease burden across multiple risk factors.

Authors:  John Ferguson; Neil O'Leary; Fabrizio Maturo; Salim Yusuf; Martin O'Donnell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.