Literature DB >> 24415775

Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema (Lymph-ICF-LL): reliability and validity.

Nele Devoogdt1, An De Groef, Ad Hendrickx, Robert Damstra, Anke Christiaansen, Inge Geraerts, Nele Vervloesem, Ignace Vergote, Marijke Van Kampen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients may develop primary (congenital) or secondary (acquired) lymphedema, causing significant physical and psychosocial problems. To plan treatment for lymphedema and monitor a patient's progress, swelling, and problems in functioning associated with lymphedema development should be assessed at baseline and follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability (test-retest, internal consistency, and measurement variability) and validity (content and construct) of data obtained with the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphoedema (Lymph-ICF-LL).
DESIGN: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: The Lymph-ICF-LL is a descriptive, evaluative tool containing 28 questions about impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in patients with lower limb lymphedema. The questionnaire has 5 domains: physical function, mental function, general tasks/household activities, mobility activities, and life domains/social life. The reliability and validity of the Lymph-ICF-LL were examined in 30 participants with objective lower limb lymphedema.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged from .69 to .94, and Cronbach alpha coefficients for internal consistency ranged from .82 to .97. Measurement variability was acceptable (standard error of measurement=5.9-12.6). Content validity was good because all questions were understandable for 93% of participants, the scoring system (visual analog scale) was clear, and the questionnaire was comprehensive for 90% of participants. Construct validity was good. All hypotheses for assessing convergent validity and divergent validity were accepted. LIMITATIONS: The known-groups validity and responsiveness of the Dutch Lymph-ICF-LL and the cross-cultural validity of the English version of the Lymph-ICF-LL were not investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: The Lymph-ICF-LL is a Dutch questionnaire with evidence of reliability and validity for assessing impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in people with primary or secondary lower limb lymphedema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24415775     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  10 in total

1.  Development and Validation of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Lower Limb.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Jennifer K Doersam; Deonni P Stolldorf; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.589

2.  Comprehensive Decongestive Therapy as a Treatment for Secondary Lymphedema of the Lower Extremity and Quality of Life of Women After Gynecological Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Lucia Kendrová; Wioletta Mikuľáková; Katarína Urbanová; Štefánia Andraščíková; Silvia Žultáková; Peter Takáč; Yuriy Peresta
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-17

3.  Functionality and quality of life of patients with unilateral lymphedema of a lower limb: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Barbara Cristina de Sousa Pedrosa; Juliana Netto Maia; Ana Paula de Lima Ferreira; Maria das Graças Rodrigues de Araújo; Eduardo José Nepomuceno Montenegro; Fernando Leonel da Silva; Célia Maria Machado Barbosa de Castro; Maria do Amparo Andrade
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2019-05-07

4.  Primary lymphedema French National Diagnosis and Care Protocol (PNDS; Protocole National de Diagnostic et de Soins).

Authors:  Stéphane Vignes; Juliette Albuisson; Laurence Champion; Joël Constans; Valérie Tauveron; Julie Malloizel; Isabelle Quéré; Laura Simon; Maria Arrault; Patrick Trévidic; Philippe Azria; Annabel Maruani
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 5.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures With Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedemas: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Margit Eidenberger
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Severe lymphoedema in gynaecological cancers: Impact of pneumatic compression on quality of life.

Authors:  Aoife Freyne; Niamh O Donoghue; Yulia Shahabuddin; Roisin Baker; Claire Murtagh; Noreen Gleeson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-12-07

7.  The ICC Compression Questionnaire: A Comprehensive Tool to Evaluate Compression Materials or Devices Applied in Subjects with Lymphedema or Chronic Venous Disease.

Authors:  Nele Devoogdt; Hugo Partsch; An-Kathleen Heroes; Tessa De Vrieze; An De Groef; Inge Geraerts; Robert J Damstra; Juerg Hafner; Vaughan Keeley; Anja Becker; Giovanni Mosti; Els Brouwer; Sarah Thomis
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.589

8.  Home-Based Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Therapy: The Impact in Chronic Leg Lymphedema in Patients Treated for Gynecologic Cancer.

Authors:  Yoon Kim; Seonghee Kim; Ji Young Lim; Chea Min Hwang; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Ji Hye Hwang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 9.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis.

Authors:  Louise Marie Beelen; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck; Elena Tsangaris; Michelle Coriddi; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea L Pusic; Anne Klassen; Dalibor Vasilic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Home management of lower limb lymphoedema with an intermittent pneumatic compression device: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nyree Dunn; E Mark Williams; Michelle Fishbourne; Gina Dolan; Jane H Davies
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-09-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.