Literature DB >> 24415059

Motor cortex excitability and connectivity in chronic stroke: a multimodal model of functional reorganization.

Lukas J Volz1, Anna-Sophia Sarfeld, Svenja Diekhoff, Anne K Rehme, Eva-Maria Pool, Simon B Eickhoff, Gereon R Fink, Christian Grefkes.   

Abstract

Cerebral ischemia triggers a cascade of cellular processes, which induce neuroprotection, inflammation, apoptosis and regeneration. At the neural network level, lesions concomitantly induce cerebral plasticity. Yet, many stroke survivors are left with a permanent motor deficit, and only little is known about the neurobiological factors that determine functional outcome after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are non-invasive approaches that allow insights into the functional (re-) organization of the cortical motor system. We here combined neuronavigated TMS, MRI and analyses of connectivity to investigate to which degree recovery of hand function depends on corticospinal tract (CST) damage and biomarkers of cerebral plasticity like cortical excitability and motor network effective connectivity. As expected, individual motor performance of 12 stroke patients with persistent motor deficits was found to depend upon the degree of CST damage but also motor cortex excitability and interhemispheric connectivity. In addition, the data revealed a strong correlation between reduced ipsilesional motor cortex excitability and reduced interhemispheric inhibition in severely impaired patients. Interindividual differences in ipsilesional motor cortex excitability were stronger related to the motor deficit than abnormal interhemispheric connectivity or CST damage. Multivariate linear regression analysis combining the three factors accounted for more than 80 % of the variance in functional impairment. The inter-relation of cortical excitability and reduced interhemispheric inhibition provides direct multi-modal evidence for the disinhibition theory of the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Finally, our data reveal a key mechanism (i.e., the excitability-related reduction in interhemispheric inhibition) accounting for the rehabilitative potential of novel therapeutic approaches which aim at modulating cortical excitability in stroke patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24415059     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-013-0702-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  38 in total

Review 1.  Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachele Bertani; Corrado Melegari; Maria C De Cola; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  The functional role of beta-oscillations in the supplementary motor area during reaching and grasping after stroke: A question of structural damage to the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Fanny Quandt; Marlene Bönstrup; Robert Schulz; Jan E Timmermann; Maike Mund; Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Hebbian-Type Primary Motor Cortex Stimulation: A Potential Treatment of Impaired Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kate Pirog Revill; Marc W Haut; Samir R Belagaje; Fadi Nahab; Daniel Drake; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 4.  Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  [The importance of neuronal networks for motor rehabilitation after a stroke].

Authors:  F C Hummel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Brain After Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms from Animal Models.

Authors:  Ying Xing; Yuqian Zhang; Congqin Li; Lu Luo; Yan Hua; Jian Hu; Yulong Bai
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.231

8.  Motor overflow in the lower limb after stroke: Insights into mechanisms.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.698

9.  BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke.

Authors:  Alexander B Remsik; Peter L E van Kan; Shawna Gloe; Klevest Gjini; Leroy Williams; Veena Nair; Kristin Caldera; Justin C Williams; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Pierre Nicolo; Leonardo G Cohen; Armin Schnider; Ethan R Buch
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.