Literature DB >> 24414096

Effect of casino-related sound, red light and pairs on decision-making during the Iowa gambling task.

Damien Brevers1, Xavier Noël, Antoine Bechara, Nora Vanavermaete, Paul Verbanck, Charles Kornreich.   

Abstract

Casino venues are often characterized by "warm" colors, reward-related sounds, and the presence of others. These factors have always been identified as a key factor in energizing gambling. However, few empirical studies have examined their impact on gambling behaviors. Here, we aimed to explore the impact of combined red light and casino-related sounds, with or without the presence of another participant, on gambling-related behaviors. Gambling behavior was estimated with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Eighty non-gamblers participants took part in one of four experimental conditions (20 participants in each condition); (1) IGT without casino-related sound and under normal (white) light (control), (2) IGT with combined casino-related sound and red light (casino alone), (3) IGT with combined casino-related sound, red light and in front of another participant (casino competition-implicit), and (4) IGT with combined casino-related sound, red light and against another participant (casino competition-explicit). Results showed that, in contrast to the control condition, participants in the three "casino" conditions did not exhibit slower deck selection reaction time after losses than after rewards. Moreover, participants in the two "competition" conditions displayed lowered deck selection reaction time after losses and rewards, as compared with the control and the "casino alone" conditions. These findings suggest that casino environment may diminish the time used for reflecting and thinking before acting after losses. These findings are discussed along with the methodological limitations, potential directions for future studies, as well as implications to enhance prevention strategies of abnormal gambling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24414096      PMCID: PMC4096325          DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9441-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  16 in total

1.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

2.  The social contagion of gambling: how venue size contributes to player losses.

Authors:  Matthew J Rockloff; Nancy Greer; Carly Fay
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2011-09

Review 3.  Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations.

Authors:  Matthias Brand; Kirsten Labudda; Hans J Markowitsch
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2006-08-30

Review 4.  Parameters for safer gambling behavior: examining the empirical research.

Authors:  Allyson J Peller; Debi A LaPlante; Howard J Shaffer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2008-05-28

5.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Motivation for gambling as revealed in the marketing methods of the legitimate gambling industry.

Authors:  H F Hess; J V Diller
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1969-08

7.  Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.

Authors:  R F Baumeister
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-03

8.  Competition and instructional set effects on the speed and accuracy of a throwing task.

Authors:  J B Gross; D L Gill
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 9.  Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The irrelevancy of game-type in the acquisition, development, and maintenance of problem gambling.

Authors:  Mark D Griffiths; Michael Auer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-17
View more
  5 in total

1.  The effects of sound in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.

Authors:  Brian C Howatt; Michael E Young
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-20

2.  Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.

Authors:  Mariya V Cherkasova; Luke Clark; Jason J S Barton; Michael Schulzer; Mahsa Shafiee; Alan Kingstone; A Jon Stoessl; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Winning and losing: Effects on impulsive action.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Natalia S Lawrence; Ian P L McLaren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Does Individual Gambling Behavior Vary across Gambling Venues with Differing Numbers of Terminals? An Empirical Real-World Study using Player Account Data.

Authors:  Dominic Sagoe; Ståle Pallesen; Mark D Griffiths; Rune A Mentzoni; Tony Leino
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-16

5.  Pupil dilation and response slowing distinguish deliberate explorative choices in the probabilistic learning task.

Authors:  Galina L Kozunova; Ksenia E Sayfulina; Andrey O Prokofyev; Vladimir A Medvedev; Anna M Rytikova; Tatiana A Stroganova; Boris V Chernyshev
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.526

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.