Literature DB >> 24413963

A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant point source of wind-borne odor.

C T David1, J S Kennedy, A R Ludlow, J N Perry, C Wall.   

Abstract

This communication reappraises the behavioral evidence concerning insect flight toward a point source of wind-borne odor in the light of meteorological information not yet considered in this context. The horizontal tracks of puffs of smoke from a generator in the open air were videorecorded and found to continue along nearly straight lines from the source for at least 25 m, while the shifting wind direction caused the plume formed by the succession of puffs to "snake" to and fro. It is inferred from this and much previous work that within such a distance the wind will be aligned on the source of any wind-borne odor wherever the odor can be detected. This being so, a strategy of finding the odor source by flying roughly upwind on meeting the odor, but holding station against the wind with or without casting across it on losing the odor (odor-modulated anemotaxis), seems likely to be highly adaptive, whereas a strategy of flying along the plume ("odor-trail following") seems unlikely since it would often take the flier in "wrong" directions and would be more disrupted by turbulence.

Year:  1982        PMID: 24413963     DOI: 10.1007/BF00990753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  4 in total

1.  Peak to average concentration ratios according to a fluctuating plume dispersion model.

Authors:  F GIFFORD
Journal:  Int J Air Pollut       Date:  1960-10

2.  Pheromone source location by flying moths: a supplementary non-anemotactic mechanism.

Authors:  T C Baker; L P Kuenen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Chemical trail-following by flying insects: a mechanism for orientation to a distant odor source.

Authors:  S R Farkas; H H Shorey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Behavioral responses to insect pheromones.

Authors:  H H Shorey
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 19.686

  4 in total
  14 in total

1.  Position around a tree: consequences for pheromone detection.

Authors:  Ginger L Miller; Catherine Loudon; Sarah Freed
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Odor detection in insects: volatile codes.

Authors:  M de Bruyne; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Estimating maximum horizontal area of pheromone plumes.

Authors:  B H Stanley; H E Hummel; W G Ruesink
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Effect of some floral scents on host finding by thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera).

Authors:  W D Kirk
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Spatial distribution of odors in simulated benthic boundary layer flows.

Authors:  P A Moore; M J Weissburg; J M Parrish; R K Zimmer-Faust; G A Gerhardt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Temporal clumping of bark beetle arrival at pheromone traps: Modeling anemotaxis in chaotic plumes.

Authors:  J A Byers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor.

Authors:  Ring T Cardé; Mark A Willis
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Variable wind directions and anemotactic strategies of searching for an odour plume.

Authors:  M W Sabelis; P Schippers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Evaluation of time-average dispersion models for estimating pheromone concentration in a deciduous forest.

Authors:  J S Elkinton; R T Cardé; C J Mason
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  The Active Space of Mexican Rice Borer Pheromone Traps.

Authors:  Blake E Wilson; Julien M Beuzelin; Jeremy D Allison; Thomas E Reagan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.