AIM: To determine the specificity and sensitivity of assays carried out using commercially available kits for glucagon and/or oxyntomodulin measurements. METHODS: Ten different assay kits used for the measurement of either glucagon or oxyntomodulin concentrations were obtained. Solutions of synthetic glucagon (proglucagon (PG) residues 3361), oxyntomodulin (PG residues 3369) and glicentin (PG residues 169) were prepared and peptide concentrations were verified by quantitative amino acid analysis and a processing-independent in-house RIA. Peptides were added to the matrix (assay buffer) supplied with the kits (concentration range: 1.25-300 pmol/l) and to human plasma and recoveries were determined. Assays yielding meaningful results were analysed for precision and sensitivity by repeated analysis and ability to discriminate low concentrations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Three assays were specific for glucagon (carried out using the Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA), Bio-Rad (Sundbyberg, Sweden), and ALPCO (Salem, NH, USA) and Yanaihara Institute (Shizuoka, Japan) kits), but none was specific for oxyntomodulin. The assay carried out using the Phoenix (Burlingame, CA, USA) glucagon kit measured the concentrations of all three peptides (total glucagon) equally. Sensitivity and precision were generally poor; the assay carried out using the Millipore RIA kit performed best with a sensitivity around 10 pmol/l. Assays carried out using the BlueGene (Shanghai, China), USCN LIFE (Wuhan, China) (oxyntomodulin and glucagon), MyBioSource (San Diego, CA, USA) and Phoenix oxyntomodulin kits yielded inconsistent results.
AIM: To determine the specificity and sensitivity of assays carried out using commercially available kits for glucagon and/or oxyntomodulin measurements. METHODS: Ten different assay kits used for the measurement of either glucagon or oxyntomodulin concentrations were obtained. Solutions of synthetic glucagon (proglucagon (PG) residues 3361), oxyntomodulin (PG residues 3369) and glicentin (PG residues 169) were prepared and peptide concentrations were verified by quantitative amino acid analysis and a processing-independent in-house RIA. Peptides were added to the matrix (assay buffer) supplied with the kits (concentration range: 1.25-300 pmol/l) and to human plasma and recoveries were determined. Assays yielding meaningful results were analysed for precision and sensitivity by repeated analysis and ability to discriminate low concentrations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Three assays were specific for glucagon (carried out using the Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA), Bio-Rad (Sundbyberg, Sweden), and ALPCO (Salem, NH, USA) and Yanaihara Institute (Shizuoka, Japan) kits), but none was specific for oxyntomodulin. The assay carried out using the Phoenix (Burlingame, CA, USA) glucagon kit measured the concentrations of all three peptides (total glucagon) equally. Sensitivity and precision were generally poor; the assay carried out using the Millipore RIA kit performed best with a sensitivity around 10 pmol/l. Assays carried out using the BlueGene (Shanghai, China), USCN LIFE (Wuhan, China) (oxyntomodulin and glucagon), MyBioSource (San Diego, CA, USA) and Phoenix oxyntomodulin kits yielded inconsistent results.
Authors: Marissa J Kilberg; Clea Harris; Saba Sheikh; Darko Stefanovski; Marina Cuchel; Christina Kubrak; Denis Hadjiliadis; Ronald C Rubenstein; Michael R Rickels; Andrea Kelly Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Justin M Gregory; Guillaume Kraft; Melanie F Scott; Doss W Neal; Ben Farmer; Marta S Smith; Jon R Hastings; Peter Madsen; Thomas B Kjeldsen; Susanne Hostrup; Christian L Brand; Christian Fledelius; Erica Nishimura; Alan D Cherrington Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Marissa J Kilberg; Saba Sheikh; Darko Stefanovski; Christina Kubrak; Diva D De Leon; Denis Hadjiliadis; Ronald C Rubenstein; Michael R Rickels; Andrea Kelly Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Peter Almgren; Andreas Lindqvist; Ulrika Krus; Liisa Hakaste; Emilia Ottosson-Laakso; Olof Asplund; Emily Sonestedt; Rashmi B Prasad; Esa Laurila; Marju Orho-Melander; Olle Melander; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Jens Juul Holst; Peter M Nilsson; Nils Wierup; Leif Groop; Emma Ahlqvist Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-11-02
Authors: Nicolai Jacob Wewer Albrechtsen; Benjamin G Challis; Ivan Damjanov; Jens Juul Holst Journal: Bosn J Basic Med Sci Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.363
Authors: Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen; Bolette Hartmann; Simon Veedfald; Johanne A Windeløv; Astrid Plamboeck; Kirstine N Bojsen-Møller; Thomas Idorn; Bo Feldt-Rasmussen; Filip K Knop; Tina Vilsbøll; Sten Madsbad; Carolyn F Deacon; Jens J Holst Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Elizabeth Adams; Pauline Genter; Emma Keefe; Kevin Sandow; Virginia Gray; Jerome I Rotter; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Eli Ipp Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 5.602