Literature DB >> 24412229

Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience.

Scott Leslie1, Andre Luis de Castro Abreu1, Sameer Chopra1, Patrick Ramos1, Daniel Park1, Andre K Berger1, Mihir M Desai1, Inderbir S Gill1, Monish Aron2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite significant developments in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), simple prostatectomy remains an excellent option for patients with large glands.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From May 2011 to April 2013, 25 patients underwent RSP. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: We performed RSP using our technique. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Baseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative complications, 90-d complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean patient age was 72.9 yr (range: 54-88), baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 23.9 (range: 9-35), prostate volume was 149.6 ml (range: 91-260), postvoid residual (PVR) was 208.1 ml (range: 72-800), maximum flow rate (Qmax) was 11.3 ml/s, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen was 9.4 ng/ml (range: 1.9-56.3). Eight patients were catheter dependent before surgery. Mean operative time was 214 min (range: 165-345), estimated blood loss was 143 ml (range: 50-350), and the hospital stay was 4 d (range: 2-8). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Five patients had a concomitant robotic procedure performed. Early functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with an 85% reduction in mean IPSS (p<0.0001), an 82.2% reduction in mean PVR (p=0.014), and a 77% increase in mean Qmax (p=0.20). This study is limited by small sample size and short follow-up period. One patient had a urinary tract infection; two had recurrent hematuria, one requiring transfusion; one patient had clot retention and extravasation, requiring reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our technique of RSP is safe and effective. Good functional outcomes suggest it is a viable option for BPH and larger glands and can be used for patients requiring concomitant procedures. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We describe the technique and report the initial results of a series of cases of transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy. The procedure is both feasible and safe and a good option for benign prostatic hyperplasia with larger glands.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Robotic surgery; Simple prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24412229     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  From open simple to robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) for large benign prostate hyperplasia: the time has come.

Authors:  H John; Ch Wagner; Ch Padevit; J H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Long-term results after robot-assisted adenoma enucleation].

Authors:  A Häcker; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Expanding on an Established Operative Approach.

Authors:  Ross Cockrell; David I Lee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: is there evidence to go beyond the experimental stage?

Authors:  Nishant D Patel; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: Case series and literature review.

Authors:  Nathan Y Hoy; Stephan Van Zyl; Blair A St Martin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilaria Lucca; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sebastian L Hofbauer; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Management of Large-gland Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Ganesh Sivarajan; Michael S Borofsky; Ojas Shah; James E Lingeman; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

Review 8.  Comparison of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ankur A Shah; Jeffrey C Gahan; Igor Sorokin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: Technique and results.

Authors:  Octavio Castillo; Ivar Vidal-Mora; Arquimedes Rodriguez-Carlin; Andres Silva; Oscar Schatloff; Vincenzo Borgna
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 10.  Laparoscopic adenomectomy in BPH - Does it have a role today?

Authors:  Ramalingam Manickam; Sivasankaran Nachimuthu; Senthil Kallappan; Mizar G Pai
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2017-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.