Barbara Sneyers1, Pierre-François Laterre2, Emmanuelle Bricq3, Marc M Perreault4, Dominique Wouters5, Anne Spinewine6. 1. Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pharmacy, Cliniques universitaires saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Barbara.Sneyers@uclouvain.be. 2. Department of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Cliniques universitaires saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Inter Aide, Paris, France. 4. Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal. 5. Department of Pharmacy, Cliniques universitaires saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium. 6. Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pharmacy, Centre hospitalier universitaire Mont-Godinne/Dinant, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to explore health care professionals' (HCPs) perceptions regarding sedation recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a qualitative study, using face-to-face semistructured interviews. Health care professionals from 4 Belgian hospitals were purposively sampled. We focused on recommendations involving strategies such as protocolized sedation, sedation scales, daily sedation interruption (DSI), and providing analgesia before sedation. Knowledge, perceived barriers, expected outcomes, and responsibilities were discussed for each recommendation. Two researchers independently performed content analysis, classifying quotes according to an interdisciplinary framework and creating new categories for emerging themes. RESULTS: Data saturation was reached after 21 HCPs (physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists) were interviewed. Quotes were related to HCPs, guidelines or the system. Barriers were diverse according to the type of HCP or level of experience. Task characteristics impairing implementation of protocolized sedation included lack of means communicating goals or tasks to all HCPs providing care, ambiguous responsibilities, and unclear methodology on how to execute the recommendation. Fear of adverse events and lack of clarity regarding contraindications impair implementation of DSI. CONCLUSION: Barriers impairing implementation of sedation recommendations vary according to the type of HCP and the choice of strategy targeting light sedation (protocolized sedation vs DSI). Improvement strategies must target HCPs separately and tailored to specific recommendation choices.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to explore health care professionals' (HCPs) perceptions regarding sedation recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a qualitative study, using face-to-face semistructured interviews. Health care professionals from 4 Belgian hospitals were purposively sampled. We focused on recommendations involving strategies such as protocolized sedation, sedation scales, daily sedation interruption (DSI), and providing analgesia before sedation. Knowledge, perceived barriers, expected outcomes, and responsibilities were discussed for each recommendation. Two researchers independently performed content analysis, classifying quotes according to an interdisciplinary framework and creating new categories for emerging themes. RESULTS: Data saturation was reached after 21 HCPs (physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists) were interviewed. Quotes were related to HCPs, guidelines or the system. Barriers were diverse according to the type of HCP or level of experience. Task characteristics impairing implementation of protocolized sedation included lack of means communicating goals or tasks to all HCPs providing care, ambiguous responsibilities, and unclear methodology on how to execute the recommendation. Fear of adverse events and lack of clarity regarding contraindications impair implementation of DSI. CONCLUSION: Barriers impairing implementation of sedation recommendations vary according to the type of HCP and the choice of strategy targeting light sedation (protocolized sedation vs DSI). Improvement strategies must target HCPs separately and tailored to specific recommendation choices.
Authors: Deena Kelly Costa; Thomas S Valley; Melissa A Miller; Milisa Manojlovich; Sam R Watson; Phyllis McLellan; Corine Pope; Robert C Hyzy; Theodore J Iwashyna Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Barbara Sneyers; Pierre-François Laterre; Marc M Perreault; Dominique Wouters; Anne Spinewine Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Danil V Makarov; Erica Sedlander; R Scott Braithwaite; Scott E Sherman; Steven Zeliadt; Cary P Gross; Caitlin Curnyn; Michele Shedlin Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 7.327