Literature DB >> 24412209

Top-down response suppression mitigates action tendencies triggered by a motivating stimulus.

Scott M Freeman1, Ieva Razhas1, Adam R Aron2.   

Abstract

Motivating stimuli provoke action tendencies that sometimes lead to unwanted behavior (e.g., eating chocolate when trying to diet). Implementing control over these provocations is essential to healthy functioning; however, few laboratory-based models of such control exist. Here we developed a novel task in which thirsty human subjects made instrumental responses to obtain a juice reward (Go trials) or were required to withhold responding (NoGo trials) in the presence of a rewarded (CS+) or unrewarded (CS-) conditioned stimulus. For Go trials, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a rapid increase in motor activity for CS+ versus CS-, preceding more vigorous instrumental responding. Critically, successful NoGo trials resulted in suppression of motor activity for CS+, but not CS-. Moreover, while there was broad excitation in the hand muscles in Go trials, suppression in NoGo trials was selective to the effector that could obtain reward. These results show that response suppression can be triggered by a motivational stimulus, thus providing a richer model of self-control than classic cognitive psychology paradigms.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24412209      PMCID: PMC4396623          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion.

Authors:  Kevin N Ochsner; Silvia A Bunge; James J Gross; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Disturbed surround inhibition in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Young H Sohn; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 3.  Delay of gratification in children.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda; M I Rodriguez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  General and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Laura H Corbit; Patricia H Janak; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Klein; Etienne Olivier; Julie Duque
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Frontal theta overrides pavlovian learning biases.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Ian Eisenberg; Marc Guitart-Masip; Quentin Huys; Michael J Frank
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The general and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer are differentially mediated by the nucleus accumbens core and shell.

Authors:  Laura H Corbit; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A specific role for posterior dorsolateral striatum in human habit learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tricomi; Bernard W Balleine; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Time-dependent changes in human corticospinal excitability reveal value-based competition for action during decision processing.

Authors:  Miriam Cornelia Klein-Flügge; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  16 in total

1.  The effect of motor engagement on memory: Testing a motor-induced encoding account.

Authors:  Kaleb T Kinder; Aaron T Buss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-11-06

2.  Training voluntary motor suppression with real-time feedback of motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  D S Adnan Majid; Christina Lewis; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Withholding a Reward-driven Action: Studies of the Rise and Fall of Motor Activation and the Effect of Cognitive Depletion.

Authors:  Scott M Freeman; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Suppressing a motivationally-triggered action tendency engages a response control mechanism that prevents future provocation.

Authors:  Scott M Freeman; Dominic Alvernaz; Alexandra Tonnesen; David Linderman; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Dopamine Selectively Modulates the Outcome of Learning Unnatural Action-Valence Associations.

Authors:  Nelleke C Van Wouwe; Daniel O Claassen; Joseph S Neimat; Kristen E Kanoff; Scott A Wylie
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Easy to learn, hard to suppress: The impact of learned stimulus-outcome associations on subsequent action control.

Authors:  N C van Wouwe; W P M van den Wildenberg; K R Ridderinkhof; D O Claassen; J S Neimat; S A Wylie
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Motor Cortex Excitability Reflects the Subjective Value of Reward and Mediates Its Effects on Incentive-Motivated Performance.

Authors:  Joseph K Galaro; Pablo Celnik; Vikram S Chib
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Anxiety-mediated facilitation of behavioral inhibition: Threat processing and defensive reactivity during a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Christian Grillon; Oliver J Robinson; Marissa Krimsky; Katherine O'Connell; Gabriella Alvarez; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 9.  What Is Trained During Food Go/No-Go Training? A Review Focusing on Mechanisms and a Research Agenda.

Authors:  Harm Veling; Natalia S Lawrence; Zhang Chen; Guido M van Koningsbruggen; Rob W Holland
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2017-02-22

10.  Working memory load reduces corticospinal suppression to former go and trained no-go cues.

Authors:  Dominic M D Tran; William G Nicholson; Justin A Harris; Irina M Harris; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.