Literature DB >> 24412040

Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort.

Allison L Rosenthal1, Soren Y Lowell2, Raymond H Colton1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the aerodynamic and acoustic features of speech produced at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, quasi-experimental research design.
METHOD: Eighteen healthy participants with normal voice were included in this study. After task training, participants produced repeated syllable combinations at comfortable, maximal and minimal levels of vocal effort. A pneumotachometer and vented (Rothenberg) mask were used to record aerodynamic data, with simultaneous recording of the acoustic signal for subsequent analysis. Aerodynamic measures of subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, maximum flow declination rate (MFDR), and laryngeal resistance were analyzed, along with acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and its standard deviation (SD).
RESULTS: Participants produced significantly greater subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR during maximal effort speech as compared with comfortable vocal effort. When producing speech at minimal vocal effort, participants lowered subglottal pressure, MFDR, and laryngeal resistance. Acoustic changes associated with changes in vocal effort included significantly higher CPP during maximal effort speech and significantly lower CPP SD during minimal effort speech, when each was compared with comfortable effort.
CONCLUSIONS: For healthy speakers without voice disorders, subglottal pressure, translaryngeal airflow, and MFDR may be important factors that contribute to an increased sense of vocal effort. Changes in the cepstral signal also occur under conditions of increased or decreased vocal effort relative to comfortable effort.
Copyright © 2014 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic; Aerodynamic; Airflow; Cepstral; Laryngeal resistance; Maximum flow declination rate; Pressure; Vocal effort; Voice

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24412040     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  21 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Physiological Mechanisms and the Self-Perception of Vocal Effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Manuel E Diaz-Cadiz; Adrianna C Shembel; Nicole M Enos; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of glottal closure on the phonatory process in ex vivo porcine larynges.

Authors:  Veronika Birk; Stefan Kniesburges; Marion Semmler; David A Berry; Christopher Bohr; Michael Döllinger; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Aerodynamic findings and Voice Handicap Index in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sergio Motta; Ugo Cesari; Mariano Paternoster; Giovanni Motta; Giuseppe Orefice
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Impact of Nonmodal Phonation on Estimates of Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Estimation of Subglottal Pressure From Neck Surface Vibration in Patients With Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; James A Burns; Tiffiny A Hron; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The Relationship Between Relative Fundamental Frequency and a Kinematic Estimate of Laryngeal Stiffness in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Yu-An S Lien; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The Impact of Communication Modality on Voice Production.

Authors:  Lauren F Tracy; Roxanne K Segina; Manuel Diaz Cadiz; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Improved subglottal pressure estimation from neck-surface vibration in healthy speakers producing non-modal phonation.

Authors:  Jon Z Lin; Víctor M Espinoza; Katherine L Marks; Matías Zañartu; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.856

10.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration During Normal Voice Production.

Authors:  Amanda S Fryd; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.