Literature DB >> 24411609

Dosimetric predictors of duodenal toxicity after intensity modulated radiation therapy for treatment of the para-aortic nodes in gynecologic cancer.

Jonathan Verma1, Erik P Sulman2, Anuja Jhingran2, Susan L Tucker3, Gaiane M Rauch4, Patricia J Eifel2, Ann H Klopp5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of duodenal toxicity in patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for treatment of para-aortic nodes and to identify dosimetric parameters predictive of late duodenal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 105 eligible patients with gynecologic malignancies who were treated with IMRT for gross metastatic disease in the para-aortic nodes from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009. Patients were treated to a nodal clinical target volume to 45 to 50.4 Gy with a boost to 60 to 66 Gy. The duodenum was contoured, and dosimetric data were exported for analysis. Duodenal toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis and recursive partitioning analysis were used to determine associations between dosimetric variables and time to toxicity and to identify the optimal threshold that separated patients according to risk of toxicity.
RESULTS: Nine of the 105 patients experienced grade 2 to grade 5 duodenal toxicity, confirmed by endoscopy in all cases. The 3-year actuarial rate of any duodenal toxicity was 11.7%. A larger volume of the duodenum receiving 55 Gy (V55) was associated with higher rates of duodenal toxicity. The 3-year actuarial rates of duodenal toxicity with V55 above and below 15 cm(3) were 48.6% and 7.4%, respectively (P<.01). In Cox univariate analysis of dosimetric variables, V55 was associated with duodenal toxicity (P=.029). In recursive partitioning analysis, V55 less than 13.94% segregated all patients with duodenal toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose-escalated IMRT can safely and effectively treat para-aortic nodal disease in gynecologic malignancies, provided that care is taken to limit the dose to the duodenum to reduce the risk of late duodenal toxicity. Limiting V55 to below 15 cm(3) may reduce the risk of duodenal complications. In cases where the treatment cannot be delivered within these constraints, consideration should be given to other treatment approaches such as resection or initial chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24411609     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

Review 1.  Simple diagrammatic approach to delineate duodenum on a radiotherapy planning CT scan.

Authors:  Tejinder Kataria; Deepak Gupta; Trinanjan Basu; Shivani Gupta; Shikha Goyal; Susovan Banerjee; Ashu Abhishek; Shyam S Bisht; Kushal Narang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Feasibility of normal tissue dose reduction in radiotherapy using low strength magnetic field.

Authors:  Nuri Hyun Jung; Youngseob Shin; In-Hye Jung; Jungwon Kwak
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Para-aortic and pelvic extended-field radiotherapy for advanced-stage uterine cancer: dosimetric and toxicity comparison between the four-field box and intensity-modulated techniques.

Authors:  A Rabinovich; L Bernard; A V Ramanakumar; G Stroian; W H Gotlieb; S Lau; B Bahoric
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Management of nodal recurrences of endometrial cancer with IMRT.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ho; Pamela K Allen; Anuja Jhingran; Shannon N Westin; Karen H Lu; Patricia J Eifel; Ann H Klopp
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Target Volume and Organ at Risk Contour Delineation Agreement Among NRG Sarcoma Radiation Oncologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Baldini; Ross A Abrams; Walter Bosch; David Roberge; Rick L M Haas; Charles N Catton; Daniel J Indelicato; Jeffrey R Olsen; Curtiland Deville; Yen-Lin Chen; Steven E Finkelstein; Thomas F DeLaney; Dian Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer.

Authors:  Krishan R Jethwa; Shilpa Sannapaneni; Trey C Mullikin; William S Harmsen; Molly M Petersen; Phanindra Antharam; Brady Laughlin; Amit Mahipal; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Kenneth W Merrell; Michelle Neben-Wittich; Terence T Sio; Michael G Haddock; Christopher L Hallemeier
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-12

7.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

8.  Dosimetric impact of baseline drift in volumetric modulated arc therapy with breath holding.

Authors:  Shunsuke Ono; Yoshihiro Ueda; Shoki Inui; Masaru Isono; Shingo Ohira; Seiya Murata; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-06-08

9.  Use of Specific Duodenal Dose Constraints During Treatment Planning Reduces Toxicity After Definitive Paraaortic Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  David S Lakomy; Juliana Wu; Bhavana V Chapman; Zhiqian Henry Yu; Belinda Lee; Ann H Klopp; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J Eifel; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-25

10.  Clinical safety and efficacy of salvage reirradiation for upper abdominal malignancies.

Authors:  Jason Joon Bock Lee; Seo Hee Choi; Jung Ho Im; Jinsil Seong
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.