Andrew B Symons1, Christopher P Morley2, Denise McGuigan3, Elie A Akl4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA. Electronic address: symons@buffalo.edu. 2. Department of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early, frequent encounters with people with disabilities may improve medical students' knowledge, attitudes and skills regarding their care. We developed and implemented a longitudinal four-year curriculum addressing caring for people with disabilities. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To test differences in mean scores between intervention and control groups on individual post-survey items regarding attitudes toward people with disabilities, and to conduct exploratory procedures to examine individual factors that may account for group differences. METHODS: Students at two U.S. medical schools, one with the new curriculum, and one with no specific disabilities curriculum, were surveyed in Year 1 of medical school, prior to curriculum introduction, and again at the end of Year 3, using a validated 30-item instrument measuring medical students' self-reported attitudes and comfort toward people with disabilities. We compared mean item ratings between the two groups using χ(2) and ANOVA. Principal components analysis was then used to construct linear composite variables that were then regressed on potential predictors of attitudes and comfort level. RESULTS: The intervention led to significant or near-significant improvement in several factors. However, male students in the intervention group, particularly those who encountered people with disabilities in a clinical context, had a tendency to more frequently agree with negative statements (β = .628, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure of medical students to a longitudinal curriculum for caring for people with disabilities led to significant improvement in several factors related to comfort and attitudes. The gender-related reinforcement of some negative attitudes merits further investigation and caution when implementing the curriculum in the future.
BACKGROUND: Early, frequent encounters with people with disabilities may improve medical students' knowledge, attitudes and skills regarding their care. We developed and implemented a longitudinal four-year curriculum addressing caring for people with disabilities. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To test differences in mean scores between intervention and control groups on individual post-survey items regarding attitudes toward people with disabilities, and to conduct exploratory procedures to examine individual factors that may account for group differences. METHODS: Students at two U.S. medical schools, one with the new curriculum, and one with no specific disabilities curriculum, were surveyed in Year 1 of medical school, prior to curriculum introduction, and again at the end of Year 3, using a validated 30-item instrument measuring medical students' self-reported attitudes and comfort toward people with disabilities. We compared mean item ratings between the two groups using χ(2) and ANOVA. Principal components analysis was then used to construct linear composite variables that were then regressed on potential predictors of attitudes and comfort level. RESULTS: The intervention led to significant or near-significant improvement in several factors. However, male students in the intervention group, particularly those who encountered people with disabilities in a clinical context, had a tendency to more frequently agree with negative statements (β = .628, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure of medical students to a longitudinal curriculum for caring for people with disabilities led to significant improvement in several factors related to comfort and attitudes. The gender-related reinforcement of some negative attitudes merits further investigation and caution when implementing the curriculum in the future.
Authors: Dyego Carlos Souza Anacleto de Araújo; Janiely Sany Santos; Izadora Menezes da Cunha Barros; Afonso Miguel Neves Cavaco; Alessandra Rezende Mesquita; Divaldo Pereira de Lyra Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Nili Amir; Lauren D Smith; Anne M Valentine; Monika Mitra; Susan L Parish; Tiffany A Moore Simas Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Richard W Sapp; Stefanie S Sebok-Syer; Michael A Gisondi; Jason M Rotoli; Anika Backster; Cori McClure Poffenberger Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2020-09-02